visagrunt wrote:
Be careful what you wish for pete1061.
We are living in a new Gilded Age in which the personal interests of a handful of plutocrats serve to drive the fiscal policy agenda. A hundred years ago, it too the First World War to bring an end to that.
Then the market excesses of the 20's came along--a largely unregulated financial sector brought the economy to the brink of ruin and then tipped it over. It took the Second World War to recover.
If the United States defaults and the markets collapse, who will bear the pain of that collapse? I suggest to you that the burden will fall disproportionately on the working poor. And in the absence of the borrowing and spending authority to bring some Keynsean approaches to remedying that, the resulting Depression will be devastating.
It might bring about change, but there is absolutely nothing to suggest that it will be change of the nature or type that you would like.
Well put.
The sad part about it is, most people seem to not understand that allowing the government's borrowing power to cease will undoubtedly cause the working class to suffor worse than they already are, and that the people who cause such a thing don't give a crap because they're rich enough to muddle through it for at least a year.
If social security goes down the drain because of it, even more will be homeless because they can't work, what will happen to them? Answer: they'll either starve to death because they can't buy food, go to jail because they can't sleep on the streets, or be put into a "community shelter" and be treated god only knows how bad.
I don't see a happy ending to this, if borrowing power is disrupted people will suffor for it, all at the hands of a few politicians who should be removed from office for their gross incompetence.
_________________
Writer. Author.