Jihadi complains about lazy, rude and thieving Arabs
Can you explain why you think this thread is racist? I'm not getting it.
It is a subtle stereotyping racist pun from HisMom to "point" how "lazy, rude, thieving, unorganized" Arabs are to the point that even a west-born ISIS jihadi scum can't cope with.
I think you are taking sarcasm literally. The whole point of the thread is that this jihadi buffoon has no understanding of the culture he wants to "return" to. HisMom is attributing these ideas to him, not herself, which is ok, since this is in short what the guy is saying in his blog post. If HisMom actually endorsed these views, I wouldn't be happy about it, but I honestly don't see this at all.
The fascinating thing is the extent to which Islam is such an expression of arab culture, which has spread to large parts of the world, yet the interpretation of Islam differs in different areas. The jihadis' insistence that there is a "correct" Islam that everyone agrees on is becoming funnier and funnier.
This. The fellow's ranting was quite a revelation that ISIS is not one united homogeneous mass as most perceive it, but rather clusters of people who are unified in only their blood-thirsty hatred of "all things Western". A while ago, another blogger (forget the URL but will post it when I find it) had commented that the female Jihadis who had fled Europe for Syria seem to form tight-knit, closed cliques, and do not appear to mingle with the local women. Al-Britani's rant confirms that opinion / belief.
That lack of unity may well prove to be ISIS's undoing. In fact, I hope it does. It would also be interesting to see the local Jihadis' reaction to Al-Britani's self-righteous rants. He openly admits that he pisses them off quite a bit.
PS: Al-Britani is a convicted sex offender. I guess that answers the questions as to why he is having such a hard time finding a wife - he has been dubbed the world's "loneliest Jihadist". Bet it has nothing, nothing, nothing to do with the fact that he personifies El Creepo.
I thought this guy was with Al Qaeda, not ISIS?
There is a story about him on the Daily Mail website that IDs him as part of the Al Nusra front and a star in an anti-ISIS video. Then again, it is the Daily Mail, so a very low-credibility source...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... video.html
neilson_wheels
Veteran
Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,404
Location: London, Capital of the Un-United Kingdom
There is a story in the independent about there being dozens of Al Britanis fighting for one faction or another, I guess the toothbrush guy and the one who doesn't like arab culture are two different deluded extremists.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 76635.html
Interesting note of internal cultural friction there, too:
He said that he, like many of his compatriots, disliked and distrusted foreign fighters. He grudgingly admitted that some, like the Chechens and Libyans, were good fighters. But many of the Muslims from the West were “tourists”, who were more interested in posting photographs of themselves with guns on the internet than taking part in combat.
I thought this guy was with Al Qaeda, not ISIS?
There is a story about him on the Daily Mail website that IDs him as part of the Al Nusra front and a star in an anti-ISIS video. Then again, it is the Daily Mail, so a very low-credibility source...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... video.html
The details are sketchy but it appears that he fled High Wycombe to join Jabbat al-Nusra (which is an "affiliate" of al-Qaeda) but defected to Daesh within 3 to 4 months.
He definitely is working with the Daesh as I remember a newspaper article that was run on him after he advertised "jobs" in the "Caliphate", including positions for "press release managers", "fitness experts" and physicians.
He has also variously posted rants on his former Tumblr blog about how life in Sham (Syria) aien't all that it's cracked up to be, and how he has been forced to peel potatoes without peelers, trouble doing his laundry, the lack of chocolate, the difficulty in finding a wife, and his pressing need for a servant.
_________________
O villain, villain, smiling, damnèd villain!
My tables—meet it is I set it down
That one may smile, and smile, and be a villain.
At least I'm sure it may be so in "Denmark".
-- Hamlet, 1.5.113-116
I just read that, too.
The more I read about him, the more I feel sorry for him. He seems like a very ineffectual, lost person who has tried to make something romantic and grand out of a pretty bad life and gotten himself into the worst kind of filth.
He is pathetic in a way that reminds me a bit of the shoe bomber.
The more I read about him, the more I feel sorry for him. He seems like a very ineffectual, lost person who has tried to make something romantic and grand out of a pretty bad life and gotten himself into the worst kind of filth.
He is pathetic in a way that reminds me a bit of the shoe bomber.
Nope... don't waste your empathy on him.
He *is* the worst kind of filth. He's not some young teen who fell in with the wrong crowd, he was in his mid-20s, had a responsible job, lived with his Mum and sounds reasonably intelligent. However, he sexually assaulted a stranger (which was caught on CCTV and led to a conviction) and made the decision to flee High Wycombe to escape a criminal record. Supposedly, the British justice system treated him "unfairly" and with "racism", because how is it a crime to molest a woman in broad daylight on a public street ?
While he sees his choices as acts of self-preservation, the fact is that he decided to hurt innocent people because life wasn't going well for him. I see a pattern here for many of these wanna-be Mujahideens. Junaid Hussein similarly fled to Syria after he gained a criminal record for hacking Tony Blair's personal and bank accounts. Syria is where Britain's criminals are headed for, apparently.
A British journalist asked him if he would return to the UK if that were allowed, and his response was that he would return, but only to plant bombs and incite terror in his former country. He also published a blog post in which he called for young British Muslims to "take up the cause" and to "create terror from within".
And, despite being a convicted sex offender, he has been luring young British girls and women to leave Britain and head to Sham where they will allegedly be "protected by the "umbrella" of Sharia".
He is worse than pond scum. I hope that the Syrians are watching their girls like a hawk around this creep. Unfortunately for them, per the laws of Sharia, a girl who is raped is often considered to have "asked for it", and if married, can even be stoned for "adultery". This guy should be castrated and locked away for a long, long, long time.
Just seeing photographs of him around those young girls gives me the willies. I hope that their parents are "minding the store".
_________________
O villain, villain, smiling, damnèd villain!
My tables—meet it is I set it down
That one may smile, and smile, and be a villain.
At least I'm sure it may be so in "Denmark".
-- Hamlet, 1.5.113-116
The more I read about him, the more I feel sorry for him. He seems like a very ineffectual, lost person who has tried to make something romantic and grand out of a pretty bad life and gotten himself into the worst kind of filth.
He is pathetic in a way that reminds me a bit of the shoe bomber.
Maybe the Brits devised the ultimate anti-terrorist stratagem: weaken them from within with whinging, fussy, incompetent wannabes
_________________
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." Aldous Huxley
Then imagine someone posting it here and imagine the consequences.
The jews would cry in unison to have the thread deleted.
But it's perfectly fine the other way around, isn't it?
This. Getting really tired of the racism double standards.
agreed, people dont give a damn about Muslims or Arabs...
My sense is that Neotenous Nordic doesn't particularly care for Muslims or Arabs, either, he just resents not being able to attack Jews. (Please feel free to correct me if I misunderstood you, Neotenous Nordic)
And how exactly did you arrive at that conclusion? Can you derive any attack on jews from my posts?
I hold arabs and jews to the same standards. But if it wasn't for zionist warmongering however, we (Europeans) wouldn't have to deal with refugees that USA and Israel created, who come to Europe with their PTSD and ruined lives and cause trouble. We have called for peace, but USA and Israel insists that there is "business to take care of in the middle east". I do criticise arabs when they stir up trouble in Europe and radical Islam is to blame. But that has to do with their particular interpretation of Islam, not them being arabs. The title of this thread however, is a disgusting attack on arabs, and not radical Islam. That makes it racial in nature, and not religious.
It is downright revolting how U.S and Israel not only refuse to take in refugees , but constantly create them for European countries to deal with. We don't have infinite resources.
It is known in the media how the gulf states have not taken in a single refugee. But there's another state that has not taken in a single refugee either, and that is Israel. How come the media ignores this?
Perhaps for the same reason everybody get up in arms when Israel is criticised on this forum: it's apparently perfectly fine to dehumanize arabs, but say one negative thing about Israel, no not even jews, just Israel, and the victim card is being played all over the place.
Those are the double standards. Have your anti-arab threads all you want, but then don't come crying "anti-semitism" when zionist warmongering is criticised.
"It is downright revolting how U.S and Israel not only refuse to take in refugees , but constantly create them for European countries to deal with. We don't have infinite resources."
As I pointed out in another thread recently, the United States presently "hosts" between 12 and 20 million economic refugees from Mexico, Central and South America, and the Mid and Far East. This is in addition to Syrian (and other) refugees already taken in and placed in our country. Unless you feel economic refugees that don't go through police boarder check points as in Europe, don't count as refugees.
Please get your facts straight before you slander. Thanks.
And I won't dispute your mention of Israel (except to say they have enough problems already) but I'll throw in the last I heard about the Vatican (you know..the religion with all the money & promoting everyone to take in refugees) that they had volunteered to take in ONE family.
And" "We don't have infinite resources." Really? Did you never have "home grown" refugees in the days before U.S. involvement? What did you do to support them? Or religious killings? Etc.? Believe me....with the huge number of refugees in this country presently WE should be the ones to say: "We don't have infinite resources."
The more I read about him, the more I feel sorry for him. He seems like a very ineffectual, lost person who has tried to make something romantic and grand out of a pretty bad life and gotten himself into the worst kind of filth.
He is pathetic in a way that reminds me a bit of the shoe bomber.
Maybe the Brits devised the ultimate anti-terrorist stratagem: weaken them from within with whinging, fussy, incompetent wannabes
Daesh's hiring policies now include several rounds of interviews, a thorough background check which must include a history of at least one conviction for a violent crime in your homeland, and a significant history of mental illness. They are also not above pilfering "suitable candidates" from the "competition" (aka al-Qaeda which is no longer "hands-on" and has "franchised out" most of its "operations" to its "affiliates" anyway).
Only the most hardened sociopaths may apply. Full benefits for all mujahideens working at least 30 hours a week on the field (including participating in beheadings / bombings / flogging wayward women and girls). Death benefits include a new husband for the wife (will be forced to marry the most cut-throat Jihadi available as soon as mourning period is over), and job offers to able-bodied children ages 9 and above. Terminal death benefit payable to families of suicide bombers is 1,000,000 Syrian pounds (currency issued and backed by the Bank of al-Assad).
_________________
O villain, villain, smiling, damnèd villain!
My tables—meet it is I set it down
That one may smile, and smile, and be a villain.
At least I'm sure it may be so in "Denmark".
-- Hamlet, 1.5.113-116
One mujahid, two mujahideen.
Got it. Will tell Daesh to proof-read their job vacancy announcements -- can't have anyone thinking that they are grammar-challenged now, can we ?
Not sure what a "Shahideen" is but I assume it means the thugs at the upper rungs of the Caliphate hierarchy ? Well, if so, you start out at the bottom - like most other humans either just starting jobs or "switching fields" - and work your way up to the top. And with more "responsibility" comes greater benefit, even if you have not slit a throat in a long time, or bombed civilians in months, or even looked the other way when an under-aged girl inappropriately displayed her ankles (as opposed to whipping her to within an inch of her life) ! Kinda like the Wall Street honchos who made mega bonuses despite their corporations failing.
_________________
O villain, villain, smiling, damnèd villain!
My tables—meet it is I set it down
That one may smile, and smile, and be a villain.
At least I'm sure it may be so in "Denmark".
-- Hamlet, 1.5.113-116
I like it, and it actually sounds like something the British might come up with.
_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.
- Rick Sanchez
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
Strictly speaking, I believe Mujahideen is already in the plural. Mujahid would be the singular.
One mujahid, two mujahideen.
Also, I think the best benefit track is reserved for the Shahideen rather than the mere Mujahideen.
One mujahid, two mujahidiyan, three or more mujahideen.
There's a "dual-form" for two, not the same as plural.
Strictly speaking, I believe Mujahideen is already in the plural. Mujahid would be the singular.
One mujahid, two mujahideen.
Also, I think the best benefit track is reserved for the Shahideen rather than the mere Mujahideen.
One mujahid, two mujahidiyan, three or more mujahideen.
There's a "dual-form" for two, not the same as plural.
Fascinating! Thank you for the corrective detail, mudarris.
