Jailers stand by while paralyzed man slowly dies

Page 3 of 5 [ 66 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Aristophanes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,603
Location: USA

28 Jul 2016, 8:42 pm

@0regonGuy

I understand the anger, I really do, and to be honest more innocent people will probably die before progress is made, this is the nature of human society-- bad s**t happens, even when it doesn't need to. Society isn't a pretty thing, it can actually be a pretty disgusting thing when you get right down to it, but it's a hell of a lot better than the alternative which is anarchy and war.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,264
Location: the island of defective toy santas

29 Jul 2016, 1:53 am

AFAIC human nature can be pretty base, we're lucky we made it as far as we did. I don't hold out much further hope for our collective future, though. the worst among us are full of burning intensity while the best among us lack sufficient conviction. it is like 3 steps forward and 2 & 1/2 steps back.



0regonGuy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Apr 2015
Posts: 658
Location: Oregon Coast

29 Jul 2016, 8:00 am

Aristophanes wrote:
@0regonGuy

I understand the anger, I really do, and to be honest more innocent people will probably die before progress is made, this is the nature of human society-- bad s**t happens, even when it doesn't need to. Society isn't a pretty thing, it can actually be a pretty disgusting thing when you get right down to it, but it's a hell of a lot better than the alternative which is anarchy and war.


I agree, more innocent people are going to die. The question is who do you want to see die? Personally I want to see at least as many of the blue gang members die, as the innocent people they are killing.

As for you not wanting anarchy and war, sorry to tell you this, but you have got anarchy and war now. The police have militarized themselves into an army, and they have declared war on American citizens, and they are killing people everyday.


_________________
Autism Social Forum
A place for autistic people to discuss their interests.


0regonGuy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Apr 2015
Posts: 658
Location: Oregon Coast

29 Jul 2016, 8:45 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
Aristophanes wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
Stop twisting the meanings of words around. Every time a cop says "I was fearing for my life" he is by definition a coward. The the bully thug cops are the cowards. People who fight back against the bully thugs do not fit the definition of a coward.


When you're taking pot shots behind a group of civilians (really citizens, but since we're talking assassination we'll use the word civilian) you're not only being cowardly, you're also endangering those people-- who by all accounts were there peacefully. Not only that it destroys THEIR message, since now the story isn't about a protest against brutal police action, but the assassination of police officers-- which virtually no one is calling for but yourself and a few other fringies, not to mention that it plays right into the police union's narrative. Not only that, but it makes it hard for people like myself and the other posters here to make the argument for tighter control on police behavior, since well, they are actually being targeted and assassinated now-- and I can't from any kind of moral or humanitarian aspect defend that behavior. It doesn't help from a political perspective, rhetorical perspective, nor a progress perspective since how do you think the police will respond? *hint, hint-- they'll double down on their aggressive tactics. If you're going to turn into that which you hate, what is the point?


First off neither of those attacks endangered citizens, any more then the cops do with their shootings. If you want to talk about endangering citizens, lets talk about those cops in Washington state who sprayed a gas station and convenience store full of bullets, sending customers and employees diving on to the floor, while they were executing a man outside for throwing pebbles at them. But I guess you think it's OK for the cops to endanger a store full of people, because they don't want to get hit with a pebble.

As for how the cops will respond. I know how they will respond. They will retaliate. Thats what gangs do. They retaliate. The only thing that will stop them for retaliating, is fear that the other side will retaliate back against them again. When you retaliate against the bullies, then you can negotiate. If you don't fight back, then the bullies just keep on doing it. Which is what has been happening for years now. The number of cops getting killed has been going down, while the number of people getting killed by the cops has been skyrocketing.


I can sympathize with your anger, so forgive me when I say, retaliation for violence, an eye-for-an-eye, does nothing but create more dead and maimed humans.


And how are you going to stop it, if you don't fight back? The pigs want the ultimate power of life and death over every single person they come in contact with. They want that power, they crave it. They are not going to give that power up, just because you ask them to.

We are living in a police state. The only way to get our rights and freedom back is to fight for it.


You had used the analogy of one gang retaliating against another to describe the situation of dealing with abusive policemen. Well, one gang shooting up another in a driveby does nothing to stop violence, but only only spurs the other gang to seek revenge.
As to your question of how to stop bad police behavior - you prosecute bad cops for their crimes, and prosecute police departments and city governments that try to obstruct justice by covering up said crimes, or by suppressing evidence. And while it's been difficult to currently get such convictions, it can be done with the implementation of new laws, and the removal of old ones, such as the attempt here in Washington state to do away with the notion of provable, intentional malice on the part of the police in order to get a conviction. After all, the rest of us couldn't hope to walk away free on a murder charge just because the prosecution couldn't prove malice in the act of murder, which is the special treatment cops get from the court system.


You can't prosecute them, as long as cops get that special treatment, and they are not going to give up their powers voluntarily. The police unions have a lot of money to fight against your new laws. They are not going to let any of that happen. Again the only way to deal with bullies is to fight back. Thats the only thing they understand.


_________________
Autism Social Forum
A place for autistic people to discuss their interests.


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

29 Jul 2016, 10:03 am

0regonGuy wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
Aristophanes wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
Stop twisting the meanings of words around. Every time a cop says "I was fearing for my life" he is by definition a coward. The the bully thug cops are the cowards. People who fight back against the bully thugs do not fit the definition of a coward.


When you're taking pot shots behind a group of civilians (really citizens, but since we're talking assassination we'll use the word civilian) you're not only being cowardly, you're also endangering those people-- who by all accounts were there peacefully. Not only that it destroys THEIR message, since now the story isn't about a protest against brutal police action, but the assassination of police officers-- which virtually no one is calling for but yourself and a few other fringies, not to mention that it plays right into the police union's narrative. Not only that, but it makes it hard for people like myself and the other posters here to make the argument for tighter control on police behavior, since well, they are actually being targeted and assassinated now-- and I can't from any kind of moral or humanitarian aspect defend that behavior. It doesn't help from a political perspective, rhetorical perspective, nor a progress perspective since how do you think the police will respond? *hint, hint-- they'll double down on their aggressive tactics. If you're going to turn into that which you hate, what is the point?


First off neither of those attacks endangered citizens, any more then the cops do with their shootings. If you want to talk about endangering citizens, lets talk about those cops in Washington state who sprayed a gas station and convenience store full of bullets, sending customers and employees diving on to the floor, while they were executing a man outside for throwing pebbles at them. But I guess you think it's OK for the cops to endanger a store full of people, because they don't want to get hit with a pebble.

As for how the cops will respond. I know how they will respond. They will retaliate. Thats what gangs do. They retaliate. The only thing that will stop them for retaliating, is fear that the other side will retaliate back against them again. When you retaliate against the bullies, then you can negotiate. If you don't fight back, then the bullies just keep on doing it. Which is what has been happening for years now. The number of cops getting killed has been going down, while the number of people getting killed by the cops has been skyrocketing.


I can sympathize with your anger, so forgive me when I say, retaliation for violence, an eye-for-an-eye, does nothing but create more dead and maimed humans.


And how are you going to stop it, if you don't fight back? The pigs want the ultimate power of life and death over every single person they come in contact with. They want that power, they crave it. They are not going to give that power up, just because you ask them to.

We are living in a police state. The only way to get our rights and freedom back is to fight for it.


You had used the analogy of one gang retaliating against another to describe the situation of dealing with abusive policemen. Well, one gang shooting up another in a driveby does nothing to stop violence, but only only spurs the other gang to seek revenge.
As to your question of how to stop bad police behavior - you prosecute bad cops for their crimes, and prosecute police departments and city governments that try to obstruct justice by covering up said crimes, or by suppressing evidence. And while it's been difficult to currently get such convictions, it can be done with the implementation of new laws, and the removal of old ones, such as the attempt here in Washington state to do away with the notion of provable, intentional malice on the part of the police in order to get a conviction. After all, the rest of us couldn't hope to walk away free on a murder charge just because the prosecution couldn't prove malice in the act of murder, which is the special treatment cops get from the court system.


You can't prosecute them, as long as cops get that special treatment, and they are not going to give up their powers voluntarily. The police unions have a lot of money to fight against your new laws. They are not going to let any of that happen. Again the only way to deal with bullies is to fight back. Thats the only thing they understand.


I'm afraid if that's the only alternative, then we'll either be killed, or sent to prison. As I like my life and freedom, I prefer trying to use legal means.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,317
Location: Pacific Northwest

29 Jul 2016, 11:41 am

I find it ironic he wanted to die and he got his wish. It was as if the jailers granted it.

But really, how stupid could they be? If someone was faking it, would they actually go out of their way to starve themselves and let themselves go dehydrated? Faking it or not, they still should have taken him to the hospital. I am sure some cell mates do fake injuries to get out of jail but a professional doctor would confirm if their injury is fake or not. How can the medical staff not know about his real injuries?


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,264
Location: the island of defective toy santas

29 Jul 2016, 2:32 pm

what the jailers did went way beyond mere stupid. it was malice aforethought and bloodymindedness.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

29 Jul 2016, 6:39 pm

auntblabby wrote:
what the jailers did went way beyond mere stupid. it was malice aforethought and bloodymindedness.


I believe the legal term is criminal neglect with inhuman intent.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,264
Location: the island of defective toy santas

29 Jul 2016, 6:49 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
what the jailers did went way beyond mere stupid. it was malice aforethought and bloodymindedness.


I believe the legal term is criminal neglect with inhuman intent.

I wonder if they will ever see real punishment? [not just a counseling statement or reprimand]



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

29 Jul 2016, 10:42 pm

auntblabby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
what the jailers did went way beyond mere stupid. it was malice aforethought and bloodymindedness.


I believe the legal term is criminal neglect with inhuman intent.

I wonder if they will ever see real punishment? [not just a counseling statement or reprimand]


Well, the Spokane douchebag cop who murdered a man named Otto Zehm, who was being medicated for mental illness, was convicted and sent to prison. But then again, each state is different, so I can't tell if Oklahoma will behave as well as Washington state did.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,264
Location: the island of defective toy santas

29 Jul 2016, 11:32 pm

^^^something tells me OK [by its lousy history] will do something really douchebaggy like countersue the victim's family out of spite.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

29 Jul 2016, 11:49 pm

auntblabby wrote:
^^^something tells me OK [by its lousy history] will do something really douchebaggy like countersue the victim's family out of spite.


Well, they didn't think of that in the Zehm case, but such action wouldn't surprise me.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


0regonGuy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Apr 2015
Posts: 658
Location: Oregon Coast

30 Jul 2016, 7:49 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
Aristophanes wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
Stop twisting the meanings of words around. Every time a cop says "I was fearing for my life" he is by definition a coward. The the bully thug cops are the cowards. People who fight back against the bully thugs do not fit the definition of a coward.


When you're taking pot shots behind a group of civilians (really citizens, but since we're talking assassination we'll use the word civilian) you're not only being cowardly, you're also endangering those people-- who by all accounts were there peacefully. Not only that it destroys THEIR message, since now the story isn't about a protest against brutal police action, but the assassination of police officers-- which virtually no one is calling for but yourself and a few other fringies, not to mention that it plays right into the police union's narrative. Not only that, but it makes it hard for people like myself and the other posters here to make the argument for tighter control on police behavior, since well, they are actually being targeted and assassinated now-- and I can't from any kind of moral or humanitarian aspect defend that behavior. It doesn't help from a political perspective, rhetorical perspective, nor a progress perspective since how do you think the police will respond? *hint, hint-- they'll double down on their aggressive tactics. If you're going to turn into that which you hate, what is the point?


First off neither of those attacks endangered citizens, any more then the cops do with their shootings. If you want to talk about endangering citizens, lets talk about those cops in Washington state who sprayed a gas station and convenience store full of bullets, sending customers and employees diving on to the floor, while they were executing a man outside for throwing pebbles at them. But I guess you think it's OK for the cops to endanger a store full of people, because they don't want to get hit with a pebble.

As for how the cops will respond. I know how they will respond. They will retaliate. Thats what gangs do. They retaliate. The only thing that will stop them for retaliating, is fear that the other side will retaliate back against them again. When you retaliate against the bullies, then you can negotiate. If you don't fight back, then the bullies just keep on doing it. Which is what has been happening for years now. The number of cops getting killed has been going down, while the number of people getting killed by the cops has been skyrocketing.


I can sympathize with your anger, so forgive me when I say, retaliation for violence, an eye-for-an-eye, does nothing but create more dead and maimed humans.


And how are you going to stop it, if you don't fight back? The pigs want the ultimate power of life and death over every single person they come in contact with. They want that power, they crave it. They are not going to give that power up, just because you ask them to.

We are living in a police state. The only way to get our rights and freedom back is to fight for it.


You had used the analogy of one gang retaliating against another to describe the situation of dealing with abusive policemen. Well, one gang shooting up another in a driveby does nothing to stop violence, but only only spurs the other gang to seek revenge.
As to your question of how to stop bad police behavior - you prosecute bad cops for their crimes, and prosecute police departments and city governments that try to obstruct justice by covering up said crimes, or by suppressing evidence. And while it's been difficult to currently get such convictions, it can be done with the implementation of new laws, and the removal of old ones, such as the attempt here in Washington state to do away with the notion of provable, intentional malice on the part of the police in order to get a conviction. After all, the rest of us couldn't hope to walk away free on a murder charge just because the prosecution couldn't prove malice in the act of murder, which is the special treatment cops get from the court system.


You can't prosecute them, as long as cops get that special treatment, and they are not going to give up their powers voluntarily. The police unions have a lot of money to fight against your new laws. They are not going to let any of that happen. Again the only way to deal with bullies is to fight back. Thats the only thing they understand.


I'm afraid if that's the only alternative, then we'll either be killed, or sent to prison. As I like my life and freedom, I prefer trying to use legal means.


I'm not ready to do it either, but if someone else wants to stand up against the bully thugs, show them some respect and don't call them cowards. Because first that is just a perversion of the English language. Since someone giving up their life for something they believe in doesn't meet the definition of a coward.

Second what they are doing will send a message to the Blue Gang that their shoot first and ask questions later policy will ultimately backfire on them, and more cops will die because of it. And that is what will change things. The pigs will ignore BLM protests forever, but when cops start dying, things will change.


_________________
Autism Social Forum
A place for autistic people to discuss their interests.


Adamantium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2013
Age: 1026
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,863
Location: Erehwon

30 Jul 2016, 9:16 am

0regonGuy wrote:
You can't prosecute them, as long as cops get that special treatment, and they are not going to give up their powers voluntarily. The police unions have a lot of money to fight against your new laws. They are not going to let any of that happen. Again the only way to deal with bullies is to fight back. Thats the only thing they understand.


I understand your rage. I feel it too. But you couldn't be more wrong.

The only way to effectively fight back is through politics, not guns.

You often can't effectively prosecute police in the current system because it has been set up to protect them. The way to fix that is to change the system so that it brings the bad police to justice. The only way to do that is by political pressure.

Your assignment of collective guilt to all police is wrong. A little thinking makes it clear that most police are good.

Consider the New York Police department: 51,000 strong with 34,000 uniformed officers policing 8.4 million city residents and another 0.6 million daily commuters. Among those officers have been some of the worst: murderers, drug dealers, torturers, rapists, arsonists. There is almost no kind of crime that hasn't been perpetrated by corrupt members of the NYPD at one time or another.

And it has historically been very difficult to prosecute them, because the worst offenders tend to be protected by the "blue wall of silence" -- the successful prosecution of Police Officer Justin Volpe, the man who tortured Abner Louima in the most disgusting way is the exception that proves the rule of how powerful that blue wall of silence can be.

Despite the outrage and horror of this kind of crime by police officers, the reality is that the criminal officers are a tiny minority. Given the sheer numbers of police in the NYPD, and the number of interactions they have with citizens of New York, there would be huge numbers of deaths and beatings if all those police behaved like the criminals among them.

There is a lot of room for improvement. The CCRB mechanism is hopelessly broken and must be reformed. But things are much, much better than they used to be because of legal reform by political activists, legislators and lawyers--not because of people shooting police. The work of Theodore Roosevelt, the Knapp Commission and the Mollen Commission took the NYPD from a lawless group of thugs for hire who served only the rich and powerful to the usually lawful, professional body that is today.

No positive reform to that force ever came as a result of someone shooting police officers. Every one of the many positive changes that there have been over the years came from political and legal activists reforming the system.

There is no way to use bullets to make law or change procedures, the only things that will result in lasting change.
A better alternative:
Support the Preventing Tragedies Between Police and Communities Act of 2016
Support the ACLU Criminal Law Reform Project
Visit the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law resource page on Police Reform, follow the links and take political action

Instead of bullets, work politically for body worn cameras, independent civilian oversight agencies, expanded use-of-force rules, and extensive de-escalation training.

Everyone complains about politics because it's a hard process and a slow one. But it is the only thing that makes lasting change.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

30 Jul 2016, 1:58 pm

^^^
I couldn't have said it better. 8)


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


0regonGuy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Apr 2015
Posts: 658
Location: Oregon Coast

30 Jul 2016, 8:21 pm

Adamantium wrote:
[Despite the outrage and horror of this kind of crime by police officers, the reality is that the criminal officers are a tiny minority. Given the sheer numbers of police in the NYPD, and the number of interactions they have with citizens of New York, there would be huge numbers of deaths and beatings if all those police behaved like the criminals among them.


There is the first point you are wrong about. The Bad Apple argument that only a small number of cops are bad. Thats is nothing but police apologist BS. Did you even watch the video? Where are the good cops in that video. There are no good cops there. If only a minority of the cops were bad, then there would have to have been at least one good cop in that jail, who would have gotten medical help for that man. But there were no good cops there to do that.

There are a huge numbers of deaths and beatings by the NYPD and everywhere. How many people would have to be killed or beaten by the police before you would change your mind about it being a tiny minority of the cops who are bad?


_________________
Autism Social Forum
A place for autistic people to discuss their interests.