Board index › General Discussion › News and Current Events

Trump

Page 3 of 14 [ 220 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 14  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

feral botanist
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Jul 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 881
Location: in the dry land

28 Mar 2017, 7:31 am

EzraS wrote:
feral botanist wrote:
EzraS wrote:
feral botanist wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
You mean so-called judges!


They were sworn in, and preside over a court of law, making binding decisions. Just because you and Trump call them "so-called judges," because you don't approve of their rulings, doesn't invalidate their positions on the bench.



He is making a joke with the added benefit, that if he gets a rise out of someone, he can feel powerful, so just ignore him.


You're the one with the superiority complex, who's into heckling, not I.

Now be sure to come up with some logical fallacies you pretend apply.



Love you Ezra


You love to target me that's for sure.

No.

Ive told you who I target and why.

In the post where I addressed Kraichgauer. I stated very clearly why he should ignore your comment.

This is a pattern for you.

A someposts somwthing political

B you post a "joke", which is usually an outrageous statement, you know will offend or bother someone.

C someone else posts a serious response to your "joke"

D you get to say "hey Im only joking you irrational person" or words to that effect

E topic is disrupted and you feel in control and powerfull



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

28 Mar 2017, 7:43 am

feral botanist wrote:
EzraS wrote:
feral botanist wrote:
EzraS wrote:
feral botanist wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
You mean so-called judges!


They were sworn in, and preside over a court of law, making binding decisions. Just because you and Trump call them "so-called judges," because you don't approve of their rulings, doesn't invalidate their positions on the bench.



He is making a joke with the added benefit, that if he gets a rise out of someone, he can feel powerful, so just ignore him.


You're the one with the superiority complex, who's into heckling, not I.

Now be sure to come up with some logical fallacies you pretend apply.



Love you Ezra


You love to target me that's for sure.

No.

Ive told you who I target and why.

In the post where I addressed Kraichgauer. I stated very clearly why he should ignore your comment.

This is a pattern for you.

A someposts somwthing political

B you post a "joke", which is usually an outrageous statement, you know will offend or bother someone.

C someone else posts a serious response to your "joke"

D you get to say "hey Im only joking you irrational person" or words to that effect

E topic is disrupted and you feel in control and powerfull


A yeah that tends to happen here.

B nonsense.

C happens sometimes unfortunately.

D I said no such thing to Bill

E You are the one with the superiority complex, with witch you heckle and browbeat others for not measuring up to your self-proclaimed superior standards of logic.

I'm placing you on ignore mode now.

Future baiting attempts from you will be reported as such.



feral botanist
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Jul 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 881
Location: in the dry land

28 Mar 2017, 8:50 am

EzraS wrote:
feral botanist wrote:
EzraS wrote:
feral botanist wrote:
EzraS wrote:
feral botanist wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
You mean so-called judges!


They were sworn in, and preside over a court of law, making binding decisions. Just because you and Trump call them "so-called judges," because you don't approve of their rulings, doesn't invalidate their positions on the bench.



He is making a joke with the added benefit, that if he gets a rise out of someone, he can feel powerful, so just ignore him.


You're the one with the superiority complex, who's into heckling, not I.

Now be sure to come up with some logical fallacies you pretend apply.



Love you Ezra


You love to target me that's for sure.

No.

Ive told you who I target and why.

In the post where I addressed Kraichgauer. I stated very clearly why he should ignore your comment.

This is a pattern for you.

A someposts somwthing political

B you post a "joke", which is usually an outrageous statement, you know will offend or bother someone.

C someone else posts a serious response to your "joke"

D you get to say "hey Im only joking you irrational person" or words to that effect

E topic is disrupted and you feel in control and powerfull


A yeah that tends to happen here.

B nonsense.

C happens sometimes unfortunately.

D I said no such thing to Bill

E You are the one with the superiority complex, with witch you heckle and browbeat others for not measuring up to your self-proclaimed superior standards of logic.

I'm placing you on ignore mode now.

Future baiting attempts from you will be reported as such.



I have asked you to ignore my posts many times, and yet here we are again.

What is the term you all use, "butthurt"?



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

28 Mar 2017, 9:49 am

BettaPonic wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
BettaPonic wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
AndrewBatman82 wrote:
i have no problem with the ban and yes i voted for Trump because he didn't let four brave americans die like Clinton did. Trump is an outsider and thats why he won he has no political strings. the judges are being to progressive and not following the rule of law. the president can ban foreign countries if he sees them as a threat to national security. im surprised that Saudi Arabia was not on the list


That's because Trump personally does business in Saudi Arabia, not to mention how America has a pusher/addict relationship with them in regards to oil.

I know it will never happen, but if you are going to ban people because they come from an area with people who pose a threat to Americans. I would say at least choose one that is actually a threat.


I concur, if the people being banned are shown to be an actual threat.

Do you feel any countries should have this ban?


I think visitors and immigrants from there should be given extra vetting, but it's essentially Un-American to ban whole populations of people due to the actions of individuals or governments.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

28 Mar 2017, 10:05 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
BettaPonic wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
BettaPonic wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
AndrewBatman82 wrote:
i have no problem with the ban and yes i voted for Trump because he didn't let four brave americans die like Clinton did. Trump is an outsider and thats why he won he has no political strings. the judges are being to progressive and not following the rule of law. the president can ban foreign countries if he sees them as a threat to national security. im surprised that Saudi Arabia was not on the list


That's because Trump personally does business in Saudi Arabia, not to mention how America has a pusher/addict relationship with them in regards to oil.

I know it will never happen, but if you are going to ban people because they come from an area with people who pose a threat to Americans. I would say at least choose one that is actually a threat.


I concur, if the people being banned are shown to be an actual threat.

Do you feel any countries should have this ban?


I think visitors and immigrants from there should be given extra vetting, but it's essentially Un-American to ban whole populations of people due to the actions of individuals or governments.


That sounds perfectly reasonable and I doubt anyone would have had a problem with it.



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

28 Mar 2017, 10:12 am

Apparently someone thinks it's okay to troll and bait people, as long as they're told to just ignore it. What a masterpiece of illogic that is. Surely such an individual is up to no good.



androbot01
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

28 Mar 2017, 10:30 am

EzraS wrote:
You love to target me that's for sure.


feral botanist wrote:
This is a pattern for you.

A someposts somwthing political

B you post a "joke", which is usually an outrageous statement, you know will offend or bother someone.

C someone else posts a serious response to your "joke"

D you get to say "hey Im only joking you irrational person" or words to that effect

E topic is disrupted and you feel in control and powerfull

I have noticed this pattern too. Thank you for pointing it out.
I think Ezra likes to derail topics, especially ones where his viewpoint is not supported.



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

28 Mar 2017, 10:57 am

The only two people I have ever had put on ignore mode are teaming up against me lol. It will be interesting to see how far they take it to try getting me to take their bait and respond to them. People pulling such shenanigans are obviously up to no good.



feral botanist
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Jul 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 881
Location: in the dry land

28 Mar 2017, 11:11 am

androbot01 wrote:
EzraS wrote:
You love to target me that's for sure.


feral botanist wrote:
This is a pattern for you.

A someposts somwthing political

B you post a "joke", which is usually an outrageous statement, you know will offend or bother someone.

C someone else posts a serious response to your "joke"

D you get to say "hey Im only joking you irrational person" or words to that effect

E topic is disrupted and you feel in control and powerfull

I have noticed this pattern too. Thank you for pointing it out.
I think Ezra likes to derail topics, especially ones where his viewpoint is not supported.



I dont understand people, but I am good with patterns.

Raptor does something similar, he tries to shock you with bizarre provocative statements and then accuses you of being too sensitive (or his sock puppet does).



androbot01
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

28 Mar 2017, 11:23 am

feral botanist wrote:
...(or his sock puppet does).

I have become suspicious of sock puppetry lately.



Darmok
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,030
Location: New England

28 Mar 2017, 12:26 pm

EzraS wrote:
The only two people I have ever had put on ignore mode are teaming up against me lol. It will be interesting to see how far they take it to try getting me to take their bait and respond to them. People pulling such shenanigans are obviously up to no good.

LOL, no worries, Ezra. There are always a few old-fashioned senior citizens in every crowd who don't get along with teenagers. :D


_________________
 
There Are Four Lights!


androbot01
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

28 Mar 2017, 1:00 pm

Darmok wrote:
EzraS wrote:
The only two people I have ever had put on ignore mode are teaming up against me lol. It will be interesting to see how far they take it to try getting me to take their bait and respond to them. People pulling such shenanigans are obviously up to no good.

LOL, no worries, Ezra. There are always a few old-fashioned senior citizens in every crowd who don't get along with teenagers. :D

Great, I'm on a support site for people with disabilities and people are prejudiced against me because of my age. :roll: It's always something.
Seems like WP has been taken over by the prepubescent male crowd, always a perennial favorite - the hero with a thousand faces. I guess when you're a 46 year old woman you get to be the monster.



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

28 Mar 2017, 1:09 pm

feral botanist wrote:
androbot01 wrote:
EzraS wrote:
You love to target me that's for sure.


feral botanist wrote:
This is a pattern for you.

A someposts somwthing political

B you post a "joke", which is usually an outrageous statement, you know will offend or bother someone.

C someone else posts a serious response to your "joke"

D you get to say "hey Im only joking you irrational person" or words to that effect

E topic is disrupted and you feel in control and powerfull

I have noticed this pattern too. Thank you for pointing it out.
I think Ezra likes to derail topics, especially ones where his viewpoint is not supported.



I dont understand people, but I am good with patterns.

Raptor does something similar, he tries to shock you with bizarre provocative statements and then accuses you of being too sensitive (or his sock puppet does).

Got examples?
And who is my sock puppet?


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


feral botanist
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Jul 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 881
Location: in the dry land

28 Mar 2017, 4:38 pm

Raptor wrote:
feral botanist wrote:
androbot01 wrote:
EzraS wrote:
You love to target me that's for sure.


feral botanist wrote:
This is a pattern for you.

A someposts somwthing political

B you post a "joke", which is usually an outrageous statement, you know will offend or bother someone.

C someone else posts a serious response to your "joke"

D you get to say "hey Im only joking you irrational person" or words to that effect

E topic is disrupted and you feel in control and powerfull

I have noticed this pattern too. Thank you for pointing it out.
I think Ezra likes to derail topics, especially ones where his viewpoint is not supported.



I dont understand people, but I am good with patterns.

Raptor does something similar, he tries to shock you with bizarre provocative statements and then accuses you of being too sensitive (or his sock puppet does).

Got examples?
And who is my sock puppet?


Interesting, so you are not denying that you have one.

:lol:



BettaPonic
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 2 Jan 2017
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 918
Location: NOVA

28 Mar 2017, 5:48 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
BettaPonic wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
BettaPonic wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
AndrewBatman82 wrote:
i have no problem with the ban and yes i voted for Trump because he didn't let four brave americans die like Clinton did. Trump is an outsider and thats why he won he has no political strings. the judges are being to progressive and not following the rule of law. the president can ban foreign countries if he sees them as a threat to national security. im surprised that Saudi Arabia was not on the list


That's because Trump personally does business in Saudi Arabia, not to mention how America has a pusher/addict relationship with them in regards to oil.

I know it will never happen, but if you are going to ban people because they come from an area with people who pose a threat to Americans. I would say at least choose one that is actually a threat.


I concur, if the people being banned are shown to be an actual threat.

Do you feel any countries should have this ban?


I think visitors and immigrants from there should be given extra vetting, but it's essentially Un-American to ban whole populations of people due to the actions of individuals or governments.

That makes sense. How about countries such as North Korea? Would it make sense to ban travel to countries that pose a threat entering. North Korea could be a good example. I would be curious what about government officials. Sorry if I am asking to many questions.



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

28 Mar 2017, 9:03 pm

BettaPonic wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
BettaPonic wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
BettaPonic wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
AndrewBatman82 wrote:
i have no problem with the ban and yes i voted for Trump because he didn't let four brave americans die like Clinton did. Trump is an outsider and thats why he won he has no political strings. the judges are being to progressive and not following the rule of law. the president can ban foreign countries if he sees them as a threat to national security. im surprised that Saudi Arabia was not on the list


That's because Trump personally does business in Saudi Arabia, not to mention how America has a pusher/addict relationship with them in regards to oil.

I know it will never happen, but if you are going to ban people because they come from an area with people who pose a threat to Americans. I would say at least choose one that is actually a threat.


I concur, if the people being banned are shown to be an actual threat.

Do you feel any countries should have this ban?


I think visitors and immigrants from there should be given extra vetting, but it's essentially Un-American to ban whole populations of people due to the actions of individuals or governments.

That makes sense. How about countries such as North Korea? Would it make sense to ban travel to countries that pose a threat entering. North Korea could be a good example. I would be curious what about government officials. Sorry if I am asking to many questions.


They should probably be given extra vetting too.