Raptor wrote:
I don't think most level headed Americans care all that much if a man owned slaves in the 18th and early 19th centuries. In that perspective he was neither awful or wonderful, it was just the times he lived in.
I just remembered something that I originally forgot to mention. Francis Scott Key
fought against the abolition of slavery. In other words, he continued to own slaves when slavery was becoming unpopular. Thus, the "product of his time" argument doesn't hold water in this instance. Key used his position as a U.S. Attorney to supress abolitionists.
Compare Key to Jefferson. Jefferson's slaves were freed upon his death. Addionally, Jefferson died before the abolitionist movement had really taken off.
The "product of his time" argument works for Jefferson. It does not work for Key.
Jefferson was ahead of his time. Key was a conservative who wanted to preserve the unfair slave system due to his dislike of change.
_________________
Synthetic carbo-polymers got em through man. They got em through mouse. They got through, and we're gonna get out.
-Roostre
READ THIS ->
https://represent.us/