...Assuming those to be accurate non-retouched, headlines...Did you notice that they:re labeled as opinion columns? Opinions are by definition " blased "

. Now, perhaps the body of the columns acknowledge his apparent 180 degree turnaround in 8 months

...
Oh, by the way, am I going to continue getting no response when I bring up my suggestion that conservative groups could try to fix the media bias they see by challenging the liscence to broadcast of so e especially egerious offenders.
Challenging, say, a Seattle or Chicago station's renewal might get more attention, Challenging an Omaha or Tuscaloosa station might increase the chance of winning, or at least, gain aa
greater amount of support from the local population. Are you going to respond to me? Or will it be crickets again?
Well well. I decided to go and find the answer to your question about the content of the body of the two articles, and this appears to be fake news. The 19th April article, unless it's been deleted, does not exist, and Max Boot has made an article about this fake news.
It's all too easy to fall into the trap of thinking that because something could be so easily verified with an easy Google search, then it must be true.