I feel that the media, and one or two key people behind the scenes of politics / journalism and the entertainment industry have been instrumental in causing Brexit.
Terrorist events created by people who are portrayed as Islamic Fundamentalists and from the "alt-right" (neo-nazi's) have been used by journalists to drive hate and fear into the hearts of the public against the foreign invaders (who are obviously only here to steal your jobs, and rape your woman... obviously...).
When ever there is hardship, as happens when there is an economic crisis, journalists will exploit the opportunity to further their own causes.
Journalism, as with entertainment industry products is rarely without bias. In essence, much of the information that we read, watch and hear, whether passively or actively... is propaganda.
I have read up a little on some of the people or players involved in this complex great game for world domination. There are people like Steve Bannon, who was Donald Trumps campaign strategist involved in political philanthropy.
I have read that he has been giving billions away to promote far right and "alt-right" political movements and individuals, to help them rise up in power by funding their campaigns as well as helping them make business connections.
Tommy Robinson is one of the people that he has given money too, as well as others such as Nigel Farage.
Mr. Bannon, who made his money from hedge fund investment sees himself as "the Devil" and counter part to George Soros. Mr. Soros is also a wealthy billionaire political philanthropist, who has been labelled "God" as he is doing the opposite by funding people who hold liberal democrat political view points and fighting for human rights.
Mr Soros, as well as Mr Bannon are both extremely wealthy and influential individuals connected with like minded people. Both men also have some connection with using the Media to spread their political view points (propaganda).
Both men are playing God so to speak with the rest of us being innocent passengers bystanders.
The difference between the two camps however, is that people who subscribe to Abrahamic moral values such as those promoted by Mr. George Soros often hold Abrahamic moral values and follow a Godly moral code, so are generally more honest than those who follow viking (rape, murder and pillage) alt right moral constructs.
As those who follow alt right / white supremacist neo nazi perceptions of the world, often follow a very strange moral code that is based around their white supremacist perceptions of the world and what is deemed right or wrong in their opinion or perception. This is significant, as world view and personal perception does determine how we act and what choices we make for not only ourselves, but others who we share the universe with as well as the world.
Far right people are capable of some extremely cunning strategies especially in war fare and politics, which perhaps would be viewed by those with Abrahamic moral constructs as dishonest.
The original nazi propaganda for example was designed specifically to demonise, bully and dehumanise their Jewish victims, so as to make it acceptable or feel right for the Germans to then murder their victims and steal all their belongings so as to become rich with ease. After all, it was the Jewish people who had a great deal of the wealth, so were the people to steal from if you were to steal.
The fact that the reason why the Jewish people had the wealth was because they were forced to develop banking, because people had ostracised them and forbid them from employment in other areas, makes it even worse. Ironically a lot of the hatred for the Jewish people has been created as some Christians blamed the Jewish people for killing Jesus Christ, the Jew.
The major problem for people with Autism Spectrum Disorder with subscribing to an alt right moral code is that
we are considered faulty goods and thus not supreme, or part of the white supremacist race, even if we come from Nordic Aryan Blood line (as i do for example, my ancestors dating back eventually to Norway).
So even if I were to subscribe to alt right political views (which i do not. I try and hold as little prejudice as possible in any form), I would eventually be weeded out and murdered if the alt right took over, for no other reason by because i suffer from Autism Spectrum Disorder, along with the rest of the genetically imperfect and those who for what ever reason oppose the alt right to rise, that includes people who suffer from Autism Spectrum Disorder.
So, where as i personally can see the logic and potential to create economic efficiency in a single world order that unites the world people as one, I am afraid i refuse to vote for isolationism based on prejudice or even to save money on tax (which inevitably is one of the reasons why so many people in the UK want BREXIT, so they do not have to pay to help other countries to recover from such things as economic crisis's. People are selfish after all).
I also do not vote for any one who wants to murder me or the rest of the people with ASD, or anyone else based on prejudice.
I do think that the isolationist strategy is what is regarded as the divide and conquer strategy that can be used to weaken factions (destroy alliances between various factions) so as to make individual factions easier to conquer, and ultimately as an overall long term plan in the great game, makes taking over the world easier and more likely.
Personally, i am disheartened to see such strategies to continue.
I would have hoped that the human race had moved on from this place by now, and would have started to attempt
to unify but for the opposite reasons.
For humanitarian reasons, to eradicate poverty, problems with drug addiction and over all suffering / hardship.
With the aim to unite all people in a world that has no boundaries, where we all can live together in peace without prejudice or inequality.
But the human race, troublesome by nature it is.
29 May 2019, 2:25 pm
