Possible 'white power' hand signs at Army-Navy game probed

Post Reply New Topic

The Daily Mail is an outright tabloid that's probably full of advertising malware.

Try posting some actually reliable evedence of active US Navy enlisted personnel who have swastika tattoos.

Is the tablod showing proof of what cyberdad is claiming?

Is it wrong because you disagree with it?
I've heard plenty about white nationalists infesting the armed services. It is not a hoax.

Don't dance around. Cyberdad is making a hugely substantial claim that the US Navy allows enlisted personnel to wear swastika tattoos. I want to see proof of that.

Ezra following his usual algorithm to criticise the source to invalidate the argument...getting old

There was a Vice documentary that had firm evidence of military marching with Neo-nazis at Charlottesville

https://www.businessinsider.com.au/char ... ?r=US&IR=T

And CD following his usual algorhithm of no source criticism whatsoever.

Yes but CD and KG provided the source....EZ is the one trying to poke holes....

I am saying there is zero documented evidence of active US Navy enlisted personnel who have SWASTIKA TATTOOS. Cyberdad appears to be the only person on earth reporting that.

He knows perfectly well that there being white supremacists in the military does not mean that they have SWASTIKA TATTOOS.

Is there any source other than Cyberdad saying that active US Navy enlisted personnel have SWASTIKA TATTOOS?

Any Navy personnel with a swastika tattoo will be immediately thrown out of the Navy.

Military Tattoo Policy and Joining the Military

Navy Tattoo Policy

According to Navy regulations, enlistment standards are based on four criteria,

Content: Obvious as it may seem, the navy doesn’t want its sailors walking around covered in images of swastikas, gang signs, or anything else that might jeopardize unit cohesion. Basically, if a tattoo pisses people off, or has the potential to piss people off because it’s considered divisive, incendiary or extreme, the navy doesn’t want it.

Regardless of the policy or how many white supremacists might be in the US Navy, is there any source on earth other than Cyberdad saying that active US Navy enlisted personnel have SWASTIKA TATTOOS?

Thunderbolts could be mistaken for swastikas.

There are certainly people with thunderbolt tattoos which don't mean anything bad.

Cyberdad seems like too much of an expert when it comes to white supremacist neo-nazi symbols to make any such mistake.

None that I'm aware of.
As Kraftie pointed out, such a tattoo would be grounds for immediate discharge.

I'm pretty certain the answer is no. The thing with this is it isn't the first time Cyberdad has brought it up. In case you are wondering why I am being dogged about it.

I think Cyberdad should realize by now whoever told him they were US Navy personnel was joking, lying or more likely just plain wrong. I mean did they show up in uniform for anyone to know that? I live a mile or two from a large US Navy base and I certainly can't tell who is Navy personnel unless they are in uniform.

Oh, I'm sure Business Insider is also a tabloid publication!