Pepe wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Your joking right?
I prefer to have claims verified, no joke.
Sorry Pepe, sometimes your attitude makes it impossible to tell what you actually believe and what you're mocking. It makes it hard to take anything you say seriously so I just gotta treat you like a less-than-skilled comedian before going back to engaging with people who seem like they might be serious.
Ouch!
Firstly, I don't mock.
Quote:
mock
1.
tease or laugh at in a scornful or contemptuous manner.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=mockI joke.
I am rarely sarcastic.
"

" is usually a give-away.
That is why I used emojis.
And I often do something like <facetious mode on>, <serious mode on>, etc.
I thought it was obvious that my saying verification of a source is only required for one side of the political divide, was irony.
I will be more careful in future.

First off, generally I like you. There's times your attitude is grating (and at least some of the time this is on me for not appreciating in the context, but if a bunch of people all agree it's probably not on us all of the time...) but overall I appreciate your wit and contributions.
When you're both making serious points and pisstakes, especially when you're staking out an additional position that complicates a more binary/simplified argument, the combination of all of those makes it a lot to parse and a lot to comprehend. While the pisstakes are also appreciated, if it's all delivered together without any real attempt to organize it it becomes overwhelming to try to respond to. Among things, one is less likely to invest effort into supporting something you've said if they're worried something else is intended to tear them a new one or satirize their arguments.
I'm less bothered by the being satirical than what Ezra's mentioned, but pretty much lockstep with the idea that it sometimes distracts from the point you're making.
We don't always notice each other's shifts of tone even when the poster feels certain it should be obvious. This might be a general observation here.
_________________
There's no such thing as a free market.If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm XJust a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.