Pepe wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Why the need for such emotiveness?
You weren't even born when it happened.
I find a more objective mindset pays greater dividends in terms of enlightenment.
Is this a reaction to the anxieties associated with the coronavirus crisis?
Or have you had a "snoot full"?

Do I sound different then I usually do on this topic?
Maybe you have the luxury if treating these matters with detachment, but considering parts of my family aren't white I tend to take problems caused by white supremacy seriously because they impact people I care about. I don't get to pretend like it's just a disagreement over ideology that has no real world implications.
I can view what happened during WWII with considerable detachment, these days.
It just takes discipline.
I don't know what your situation is over there.
I am not saying you shouldn't take you personal/family circumstances seriously.
But I think a more rational approach garners greater benefits.
I am an emotional person, but I see it as a flaw in my character and choose not to engage in cathartic emotionalism wherever possible.
I am not saying it doesn't happen, though.
"Different strokes for different folks", meh.

At least one significant difference, you seem to be discussing it as though it's only a historic issue, and it's easy to be detached when the debate is just about scoring points because the matter is resolved.
I don't believe the problem of white supremacist ideology and the actions it inspires is resolved. The last Tory MP for my riding was a woman who regularly spoke in front of white supremacist groups. Thankfully the Conservatives chose not to run that woman again, so my current Tory MP isn't a constant reminder, but that's just a single example of how it's actually 'in play'.
Here's a story from a few years back, Kellie Leitch is my former MP:
https://www.macleans.ca/politics/how-ke ... an-values/Until the shutdown at least once a day I'd hear at least one coworker going off about how indigenous people should just be dealt with violently when we attempt to draw attention to causes and concerns that are relevant to our existence. While I don't believe those people will ever 'put their money where their mouth is' so to speak, the fact that a significant portion of my neighbours and coworkers don't feel any shame over advocating for our political speech to be silenced with violence tends to keep me a little on edge. I'd like to not have to worry about potentially being targeted for violence based on the stances I take, but at the end of the day that's not a privilege I'm able to receive.
_________________
There's no such thing as a free market.If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm XJust a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.