Confederate flag tied to door of Museum of Jewish Heritage
Bravo5150 wrote:
So, it's ok to kill a kid after you discover they are a burden because of a disability, but it isnt ok to plan an abortion when you know up front the kid will be too much of a burden before it's born.
Sounds like someone taking a George Carlin joke too literally.
Sounds like someone taking a George Carlin joke too literally.
Exactly my point! they are lunatics.
On the one hand they will murder doctors who work in abortion clinics but then will champion the Nazi doctrine that the disabled are "lives not worth living"
My understanding is this results in some friction within the far right. Skinheads and Nazis will happily call publicly to kill the disabled but the far right white christian brigade will consider it against white jesus to kill little blonde children.
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,542
Location: Right over your left shoulder
GGPViper wrote:
Well, these are some of the groups the Extreme Right in the US love hating:
- Atheists
- Muslims
- Jews
- The entire state of California
- Non-Evangelical Christians (especially if they are Black)
- LGBT people
- Black people (especially Black people who vote)
- Chinese people
- Mexican people
- The People
Obviously, it is very impractical to create a distinct Hate flag for *each* of these groups, so they need to make their symbols of Hate more inclusive (huh?).
- Atheists
- Muslims
- Jews
- The entire state of California
- Non-Evangelical Christians (especially if they are Black)
- LGBT people
- Black people (especially Black people who vote)
- Chinese people
- Mexican people
- The People
Obviously, it is very impractical to create a distinct Hate flag for *each* of these groups, so they need to make their symbols of Hate more inclusive (huh?).
Actually they hate black evangelicals too.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
Jiheisho wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
Antisemitism in the antebellum american south was no worse than the antisemitism of the antebellum northern US, and that of both sections was probably less than the antisemitism of any country in Europe in the 19th Century.
So if you take the confederate flag as being just that...representing the south, or the confederacy, then it makes no sense to stick it on a Jewish museum.
However, burning a cross on the front lawn of a synagogue does have meaning, because the KKK was antisemitic, anti White immigrant, and anti Catholic, as well as being anti Black.
You could equate a confederate flag with a cross burning. But folks who wave the Confederate flag today claim it represents "heritage not hate". So...if you are a hoodlum who sticks flags onto properties you gotta make up your mind....which IS it...heritage, or hate? Ya cant have it both ways. So if it's heritage, then ...use the stars and bars for Black properties, and use the swastika for Jewish properties.
I mean...the literacy level of hoodlums and vandals these days just isnt what it used to be!
So if you take the confederate flag as being just that...representing the south, or the confederacy, then it makes no sense to stick it on a Jewish museum.
However, burning a cross on the front lawn of a synagogue does have meaning, because the KKK was antisemitic, anti White immigrant, and anti Catholic, as well as being anti Black.
You could equate a confederate flag with a cross burning. But folks who wave the Confederate flag today claim it represents "heritage not hate". So...if you are a hoodlum who sticks flags onto properties you gotta make up your mind....which IS it...heritage, or hate? Ya cant have it both ways. So if it's heritage, then ...use the stars and bars for Black properties, and use the swastika for Jewish properties.

I mean...the literacy level of hoodlums and vandals these days just isnt what it used to be!
Seriously? So if the flag is not a symbol of antisemitism in this case, what are the alternative meanings? A celebration of heritage?
You might be interested in these:
Hebrew Benevolent Congregation bombing
List of attacks on Jewish institutions in the United States
Thats my point!
It doesnt mean anything. Its a "celeberation" of ineptitude on the part of the perpetrator.
Okay...in Germany it's actually against the law to display a Nazi flag with a swastika. So in Germany neo-Nazi skin heads do indeed use the flag of the American Confederacy as a legal stand in for the Nazi flag. So if it were Germany the message would be loud and clear because the S+B would be taken as a stand in for a swastika. But in America it's legal to go around with swastika flags. So to put a confederate flag on a synagogue is just throwing a confusing curveball at any audience that your trying send a hate message to. So to me it's just laughable.
But I guess that I am old fashioned.
funeralxempire wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
Well, these are some of the groups the Extreme Right in the US love hating:
- Atheists
- Muslims
- Jews
- The entire state of California
- Non-Evangelical Christians (especially if they are Black)
- LGBT people
- Black people (especially Black people who vote)
- Chinese people
- Mexican people
- The People
Obviously, it is very impractical to create a distinct Hate flag for *each* of these groups, so they need to make their symbols of Hate more inclusive (huh?).
- Atheists
- Muslims
- Jews
- The entire state of California
- Non-Evangelical Christians (especially if they are Black)
- LGBT people
- Black people (especially Black people who vote)
- Chinese people
- Mexican people
- The People
Obviously, it is very impractical to create a distinct Hate flag for *each* of these groups, so they need to make their symbols of Hate more inclusive (huh?).
Actually they hate black evangelicals too.
Again being black supersedes being evangelical. It reminds me of a Dave Chappelle joke about Donald Sterling, Apparently he told his girlfriend not to bring her black friends home. The person he was referring to was Magic Johnson who is HIV+. The joke is that Donald Sterling is so racist that to him being black is worse than having HIV that he mentioned Johnson's race first.
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,542
Location: Right over your left shoulder
naturalplastic wrote:
Jiheisho wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
Antisemitism in the antebellum american south was no worse than the antisemitism of the antebellum northern US, and that of both sections was probably less than the antisemitism of any country in Europe in the 19th Century.
So if you take the confederate flag as being just that...representing the south, or the confederacy, then it makes no sense to stick it on a Jewish museum.
However, burning a cross on the front lawn of a synagogue does have meaning, because the KKK was antisemitic, anti White immigrant, and anti Catholic, as well as being anti Black.
You could equate a confederate flag with a cross burning. But folks who wave the Confederate flag today claim it represents "heritage not hate". So...if you are a hoodlum who sticks flags onto properties you gotta make up your mind....which IS it...heritage, or hate? Ya cant have it both ways. So if it's heritage, then ...use the stars and bars for Black properties, and use the swastika for Jewish properties.
I mean...the literacy level of hoodlums and vandals these days just isnt what it used to be!
So if you take the confederate flag as being just that...representing the south, or the confederacy, then it makes no sense to stick it on a Jewish museum.
However, burning a cross on the front lawn of a synagogue does have meaning, because the KKK was antisemitic, anti White immigrant, and anti Catholic, as well as being anti Black.
You could equate a confederate flag with a cross burning. But folks who wave the Confederate flag today claim it represents "heritage not hate". So...if you are a hoodlum who sticks flags onto properties you gotta make up your mind....which IS it...heritage, or hate? Ya cant have it both ways. So if it's heritage, then ...use the stars and bars for Black properties, and use the swastika for Jewish properties.

I mean...the literacy level of hoodlums and vandals these days just isnt what it used to be!
Seriously? So if the flag is not a symbol of antisemitism in this case, what are the alternative meanings? A celebration of heritage?
You might be interested in these:
Hebrew Benevolent Congregation bombing
List of attacks on Jewish institutions in the United States
Thats my point!
It doesnt mean anything. Its a "celeberation" of ineptitude on the part of the perpetrator.
Okay...in Germany it's actually against the law to display a Nazi flag with a swastika. So in Germany neo-Nazi skin heads do indeed use the flag of the American Confederacy as a legal stand in for the Nazi flag. So if it were Germany the message would be loud and clear because the S+B would be taken as a stand in for a swastika. But in America it's legal to go around with swastika flags. So to put a confederate flag on a synagogue is just throwing a confusing curveball at any audience that your trying send a hate message to. So to me it's just laughable.
But I guess that I am old fashioned.
Not so much old fashioned as too focused on originalism. Because the confederacy wasn't focused on antisemitism it makes no sense to use 'their symbol' for that cause while ignoring that it's not just their symbol, it's also a symbol of the current era white supremacist movement and in that context it makes perfect sense to use it for their causes.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.