07 Sep 2021, 4:49 am
Pepe wrote:
Don't forget the involvement of fauci, daszak and W.H.O.. 
Apparently, you want it to be a global conspiracy.
07 Sep 2021, 4:54 am
magz wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Don't forget the involvement of fauci, daszak and W.H.O..
Apparently, you want it to be a global conspiracy.
I want nothing but the Truth, the whole Truth, and nothing but the Truth, me lord.
07 Sep 2021, 5:04 am
Pepe wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Fnord wrote:
The claim that "Coronavirus originated in a lab" is bogus. Running the same investigation over and over again while expecting a different answer each time is a sign of insanity. Sort of like those 11,000 votes trump kept asking for -- they never existed, either.
I thought this post was worth revisiting.
Imagine the reaction should both claims turn out to have been correct
How come my reply was less black than Fnords?
It happens when people believe their words are more important than anyone elses, and so add "color" tags to ensure their words are more prominent - It comes across as rather conceited, in my opinion.
07 Sep 2021, 5:07 am
Pepe wrote:
I want nothing but the Truth, the whole Truth, and nothing but the Truth, me lord.
The whole Truth? Shall we start with quantum chemistry or history of pre-Incan religions? Or maybe my neighbour's hairstyle?
But, more seriously, what is more likely for Fauci, WHO and others like them:
being focused on other aspects of the problem (like damage control) and not wanting more political fights in their way, that's not their job
or
being part of the conspiracy?
07 Sep 2021, 9:32 am
magz wrote:
Pepe wrote:
I want nothing but the Truth, the whole Truth, and nothing but the Truth, me lord.
The whole Truth? Shall we start with quantum chemistry or history of pre-Incan religions? Or maybe my neighbour's hairstyle?
But, more seriously, what is more likely for Fauci, WHO and others like them:
being focused on other aspects of the problem (like damage control) and not wanting more political fights in their way, that's not their job
or
being part of the conspiracy?
Isn't that a little naive?
Having studied human psychology, I am comfortable with my assessment.
The obscenity.
Obscuring the Truth so something worse might will happen because of the stupidity of the naked ape.
Gain of Function is a crime against humanity, and your children and grandchildren might suffer the consequences if this abomination isn't outlawed.
The Lord, thy Skunk has spoken.
07 Sep 2021, 9:35 am
Brictoria wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Fnord wrote:
The claim that "Coronavirus originated in a lab" is bogus. Running the same investigation over and over again while expecting a different answer each time is a sign of insanity. Sort of like those 11,000 votes trump kept asking for -- they never existed, either.
I thought this post was worth revisiting.
Imagine the reaction should both claims turn out to have been correct
How come my reply was less black than Fnords?
It happens when people believe their words are more important than anyone elses, and so add "color" tags to ensure their words are more prominent - It comes across as rather conceited, in my opinion.
Perhaps it is the coronavirus doing it?
Have you ever considered that?
07 Sep 2021, 9:44 am
Pepe wrote:
magz wrote:
Pepe wrote:
I want nothing but the Truth, the whole Truth, and nothing but the Truth, me lord.
The whole Truth? Shall we start with quantum chemistry or history of pre-Incan religions? Or maybe my neighbour's hairstyle?
But, more seriously, what is more likely for Fauci, WHO and others like them:
being focused on other aspects of the problem (like damage control) and not wanting more political fights in their way, that's not their job
or
being part of the conspiracy?
Isn't that a little naive?
Having studied human psychology, I am comfortable with my assessment.
The obscenity.
Obscuring the Truth so something worse might will happen because of the stupidity of the naked ape.
Gain of Function is a crime against humanity, and your children and grandchildren might suffer the consequences if this abomination isn't outlawed.
The Lord, thy Skunk has spoken.
If something can be explained by laziness, greed or stupidity, this explanation is prefered over organized conspiracy.
07 Sep 2021, 9:52 am
07 Sep 2021, 9:54 am
Pepe wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
[snipped]
Source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9958207/Scientist-reveals-heard-Covid-Wuhan-TWO-WEEKS-Beijing-warned-world.html
Source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9958207/Scientist-reveals-heard-Covid-Wuhan-TWO-WEEKS-Beijing-warned-world.html
China has absolutely no credibility.
It astounds me that some people don't know that.
Neither does The Daily Mail. It astounds me that some people don't know that.
Media Bias/Fact Check wrote:
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news.
Overall, we rate Daily Mail Right Biased and Questionable due to numerous failed fact checks and poor information sourcing.
Overall, we rate Daily Mail Right Biased and Questionable due to numerous failed fact checks and poor information sourcing.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-mail/
07 Sep 2021, 10:05 am
07 Sep 2021, 10:06 am
07 Sep 2021, 10:08 am
07 Sep 2021, 10:09 am
07 Sep 2021, 10:11 am
07 Sep 2021, 10:14 am
Off Topic
MaxE wrote:
@Cornflake where did that graphic come from?
From the linked article. 
Quite often images can be isolated and posted separately through a right-click on the image then "Open Image in New Tab" from the drop-down menu. The URL on the new tab can then be used for posting.
In this case what's displayed in the linked article as one image turns out to be two.
Those instructions are as in Firefox 91.0.2, although they were available before that version.
YMMV with other browsers, but I expect a similar functionality exists there too.
07 Sep 2021, 10:16 am
magz wrote:
Pepe wrote:
magz wrote:
Pepe wrote:
I want nothing but the Truth, the whole Truth, and nothing but the Truth, me lord.
The whole Truth? Shall we start with quantum chemistry or history of pre-Incan religions? Or maybe my neighbour's hairstyle?
But, more seriously, what is more likely for Fauci, WHO and others like them:
being focused on other aspects of the problem (like damage control) and not wanting more political fights in their way, that's not their job
or
being part of the conspiracy?
Isn't that a little naive?
Having studied human psychology, I am comfortable with my assessment.
The obscenity.
Obscuring the Truth so something worse might will happen because of the stupidity of the naked ape.
Gain of Function is a crime against humanity, and your children and grandchildren might suffer the consequences if this abomination isn't outlawed.
The Lord, thy Skunk has spoken.
If something can be explained by laziness, greed or stupidity, this explanation is prefered over organized conspiracy.
Where did I suggest it was an "organised conspiracy"?
It was some a***holes protecting their butts.
Most people don't want to be remembered, in the anals annals of history, for being responsible for the deaths of over 4 million people and counting.
