just-me wrote:
No ,your right the secret is no secret at all , its just what they decided to call it. I'm sure it may have been a bit confusing if they called the movie the law of attraction . I don't think many people would have watched it if they had . I think they just took a few artistic liberties with the name , besides it has been called so many things in the past.
((tweety_fan wrote)
the positive thinking thing makes sense and has been written about in loads of books. but it is not perfect because it can deny the negative stuff that needs attention. and without attention the negative stuff will get worse.))
They said something about that in the movie.
"what your resist persists" They went on to say you cant ignore when something bad is going on in your life, you need to pay attention to what emotions your body is giving you. They said to acknowledge how you feel and then let it go. There not saying to ignore your negative emotions , if you do that they will over whelm you. You need to listen to what your emotions are telling you , solve the problem then try to see the good in your life.
((velodog wrote) If this has been "boiled down" to a science, then scientific method will apply, right? So how about sharing the specifics of the method as applied here? What is the :
1) observation?
2) hypothesis?
3) test devised?
4) evidence of repeatable results
I am very interested in the science behind this. Also what independent lab has verified the results? )))
It has been proven by a science. Quantum physics is finding out this is true along with many other things, its amazing the things they are finding to be true.
Who is finding things to be true? What are the observations? What hypothesis has been put forth? What test has been devised? Are the results repeatable? Have these alleged test procedures and results been scrutinized by the FDA or any accredited University Research labs?
In your very first post in this thread it says MAKE EVERYTHING BETTER EVEN CURE YOUR ASPERGERS. I'm with pakled, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
I'm old enough to remember the cold fusion fiasco. On the face of it, at that time, the individuals involved were accredited researchers: Pons, with the University of Utah and Fleischman of South Hampton University in the UK. Their claim was that Palladium rods in heavy water created cold fusion. Were is cold fusion now just-me? You elected to bring science into this conversation. Now prove your case. You claimed a cure for Aspergers. PROVE IT!