Trump orders FBI to target blacks and environmentalists
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,264
Location: the island of defective toy santas
Persephone29 wrote:
For a deep thinker you haven't played the tape all the way through to the end. Who are you going to oust from 15-20 years of dedicated service, to make way for all these success stories? How do you think these kids/graduates are going to feel when they find the job markets saturated in their careers of choice? You'll have to put a 45 year old out to pasture, and with the retirement age climbing, what will they do to survive?
Your plan involves selection, it's just not natural.
Your plan involves selection, it's just not natural.
Well given that the human race’s fertility rate has been declining since 1950, and is no longer at a sustainable rate ~ finding employment for the younger generation's "success stories" is not a problem; having enough young, healthy and well educated "success stories" is now the greater concern!
Birth rates are on the decline ~ and it's a problem!
Quote:
Why a Falling Birth Rate Is a Big Problem.
It sounds like one of those stories you can safely ignore: The U.S. birth rate has hit a record low, led by a big drop in the portion of immigrant women having babies.
https://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/rick-newman/2012/12/03/why-a-falling-birth-rate-is-a-big-problem
It sounds like one of those stories you can safely ignore: The U.S. birth rate has hit a record low, led by a big drop in the portion of immigrant women having babies.
https://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/rick-newman/2012/12/03/why-a-falling-birth-rate-is-a-big-problem
And:
Quote:
Earth population may start to fall from 2040. Does it matter?
The conventional projection by the UN is that world population, currently 7.7 billion, will increase to 11.2 billion in 2100, then stabilise before slowly declining. However, current trends cast much doubt on this picture. Fertility rates are in dramatic decline worldwide and world population may peak below nine billion by 2050 and then decline.
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/science/earth-s-population-may-start-to-fall-from-2040-does-it-matter-1.3808527
The conventional projection by the UN is that world population, currently 7.7 billion, will increase to 11.2 billion in 2100, then stabilise before slowly declining. However, current trends cast much doubt on this picture. Fertility rates are in dramatic decline worldwide and world population may peak below nine billion by 2050 and then decline.
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/science/earth-s-population-may-start-to-fall-from-2040-does-it-matter-1.3808527
_________________
I reserve the right or is it left to at very least be wrong
Deepthought 7 wrote:
Persephone29 wrote:
For a deep thinker you haven't played the tape all the way through to the end. Who are you going to oust from 15-20 years of dedicated service, to make way for all these success stories? How do you think these kids/graduates are going to feel when they find the job markets saturated in their careers of choice? You'll have to put a 45 year old out to pasture, and with the retirement age climbing, what will they do to survive?
Your plan involves selection, it's just not natural.
Your plan involves selection, it's just not natural.
Well given that the human race’s fertility rate has been declining since 1950, and is no longer at a sustainable rate ~ finding employment for the younger generation's "success stories" is not a problem; having enough young, healthy and well educated "success stories" is now the greater concern!
Birth rates are on the decline ~ and it's a problem!
Quote:
Why a Falling Birth Rate Is a Big Problem.
It sounds like one of those stories you can safely ignore: The U.S. birth rate has hit a record low, led by a big drop in the portion of immigrant women having babies.
https://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/rick-newman/2012/12/03/why-a-falling-birth-rate-is-a-big-problem
It sounds like one of those stories you can safely ignore: The U.S. birth rate has hit a record low, led by a big drop in the portion of immigrant women having babies.
https://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/rick-newman/2012/12/03/why-a-falling-birth-rate-is-a-big-problem
And:
Quote:
Earth population may start to fall from 2040. Does it matter?
The conventional projection by the UN is that world population, currently 7.7 billion, will increase to 11.2 billion in 2100, then stabilise before slowly declining. However, current trends cast much doubt on this picture. Fertility rates are in dramatic decline worldwide and world population may peak below nine billion by 2050 and then decline.
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/science/earth-s-population-may-start-to-fall-from-2040-does-it-matter-1.3808527
The conventional projection by the UN is that world population, currently 7.7 billion, will increase to 11.2 billion in 2100, then stabilise before slowly declining. However, current trends cast much doubt on this picture. Fertility rates are in dramatic decline worldwide and world population may peak below nine billion by 2050 and then decline.
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/science/earth-s-population-may-start-to-fall-from-2040-does-it-matter-1.3808527
I think someone forgot to tell the poor about declining birthrates. There's big money in procreating and welfare fraud. The Foster Care system is so flooded with children they can be murdered and the case workers are the last to know. But, okay. Keep dreaming...
_________________
Disagreeing with you doesn't mean I hate you, it just means we disagree.
Neurocognitive exam in May 2019, diagnosed with ASD, Asperger's type in June 2019.
auntblabby wrote:
no dealing with the social darwinists. the only thing that will change their minds/get them off their high haughty horse, is personal misfortune. and even that is iffy.
What sort of personal misfortune will do? Being raised by a mentally ill mother, absent father? ADHD? Sexual Molestation? Running away from home to marry and have my first child by 16 ( who I kept and raised, she's done well )? Cancer? Addiction? Arrest? Recovery? ASD diagnosis? Will those do? Because that's my story and I'm still here, fighting.
I'm just curious what actually breaks a person in your estimation? Is it strictly finances? I did squeeze college in between all those things.
I did have a secret weapon though. It was God.
_________________
Disagreeing with you doesn't mean I hate you, it just means we disagree.
Neurocognitive exam in May 2019, diagnosed with ASD, Asperger's type in June 2019.
Persephone29 wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
no dealing with the social darwinists. the only thing that will change their minds/get them off their high haughty horse, is personal misfortune. and even that is iffy.
What sort of personal misfortune will do? Being raised by a mentally ill mother, absent father? ADHD? Sexual Molestation? Running away from home to marry and have my first child by 16 ( who I kept and raised, she's done well )? Cancer? Addiction? Arrest? Recovery? ASD diagnosis? Will those do? Because that's my story and I'm still here, fighting.
I'm just curious what actually breaks a person in your estimation? Is it strictly finances? I did squeeze college in between all those things.
I did have a secret weapon though. It was God.
Not to belittle your experiences...but there are plenty of people who experience all kinds of hardship; some worse than you. Not everyone loses their compassion or empathy for the vulnerable in out society because they had to struggle themselves.
So sorry...you don't get a free pass to kick people when they are down and out just because you had a tough life.
Persephone29 wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
no dealing with the social darwinists. the only thing that will change their minds/get them off their high haughty horse, is personal misfortune. and even that is iffy.
What sort of personal misfortune will do? Being raised by a mentally ill mother, absent father? ADHD? Sexual Molestation? Running away from home to marry and have my first child by 16 ( who I kept and raised, she's done well )? Cancer? Addiction? Arrest? Recovery? ASD diagnosis? Will those do? Because that's my story and I'm still here, fighting.
I'm just curious what actually breaks a person in your estimation? Is it strictly finances? I did squeeze college in between all those things.
I did have a secret weapon though. It was God.
Congrats.
_________________
After a failure, the easiest thing to do is to blame someone else.
cyberdad wrote:
Persephone29 wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
no dealing with the social darwinists. the only thing that will change their minds/get them off their high haughty horse, is personal misfortune. and even that is iffy.
What sort of personal misfortune will do? Being raised by a mentally ill mother, absent father? ADHD? Sexual Molestation? Running away from home to marry and have my first child by 16 ( who I kept and raised, she's done well )? Cancer? Addiction? Arrest? Recovery? ASD diagnosis? Will those do? Because that's my story and I'm still here, fighting.
I'm just curious what actually breaks a person in your estimation? Is it strictly finances? I did squeeze college in between all those things.
I did have a secret weapon though. It was God.
Not to belittle your experiences...but there are plenty of people who experience all kinds of hardship; some worse than you. Not everyone loses their compassion or empathy for the vulnerable in out society because they had to struggle themselves.
So sorry...you don't get a free pass to kick people when they are down and out just because you had a tough life.
I don't need a pass. My point is that financial hardship isn't the only thing that qualifies as hardship. You keep fighting, or you don't ( and life swallows you ).
_________________
Disagreeing with you doesn't mean I hate you, it just means we disagree.
Neurocognitive exam in May 2019, diagnosed with ASD, Asperger's type in June 2019.
cyberdad wrote:
I don't expect you folks to distinguish objectiveness from being an impartial snow-flake bleeding heart liberal.
Having socialist tendencies doesn't mean we are communists hell bent on destroying democracy
Having socialist tendencies doesn't mean we are communists hell bent on destroying democracy
The only thing I consistently expect from you is 'gimme.'
_________________
Disagreeing with you doesn't mean I hate you, it just means we disagree.
Neurocognitive exam in May 2019, diagnosed with ASD, Asperger's type in June 2019.
Persephone29 wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
I don't expect you folks to distinguish objectiveness from being an impartial snow-flake bleeding heart liberal.
Having socialist tendencies doesn't mean we are communists hell bent on destroying democracy
Having socialist tendencies doesn't mean we are communists hell bent on destroying democracy
The only thing I consistently expect from you is 'gimme.'
cyberdad is from Australia, and in Australia they already have things like universal health care, you know, that "gimme" thing or whatever.
_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin
beneficii wrote:
Persephone29 wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
I don't expect you folks to distinguish objectiveness from being an impartial snow-flake bleeding heart liberal.
Having socialist tendencies doesn't mean we are communists hell bent on destroying democracy
Having socialist tendencies doesn't mean we are communists hell bent on destroying democracy
The only thing I consistently expect from you is 'gimme.'
cyberdad is from Australia, and in Australia they already have things like universal health care, you know, that "gimme" thing or whatever.
I know where he's from. I also know he doesn't want more immigrants than the outer cities of Australia can handle. Meanwhile, there's a huge chunk of inhabitable land in the center of Australia called 'the Outback.' It's only populated by about 700,000 aboriginals and Cyberdad thinks Australia should save that to preserve Australia's natural resources, while claiming how sh***y the rest of the world is for not cramming every living, breathing person possible on their land. So, of course he wants socialized everything, because how else could anyone afford that? He accomplishes two things: he makes sure Australia dodges an invasion and they aren't likely to relocate because they'll be getting free s**t from everyone else.
I have no use for Cyberdad's version of 'compassion' because it involves everyone else but him.
_________________
Disagreeing with you doesn't mean I hate you, it just means we disagree.
Neurocognitive exam in May 2019, diagnosed with ASD, Asperger's type in June 2019.
Everybody needs to stop the bickering.
I could search posts and find the truth but the truth is I don't care who said what or when , it's in the past , move on.
Get back to bashing people you are allowed to bash.
_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1
Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard
Persephone29 wrote:
beneficii wrote:
Persephone29 wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
I don't expect you folks to distinguish objectiveness from being an impartial snow-flake bleeding heart liberal.
Having socialist tendencies doesn't mean we are communists hell bent on destroying democracy
Having socialist tendencies doesn't mean we are communists hell bent on destroying democracy
The only thing I consistently expect from you is 'gimme.'
cyberdad is from Australia, and in Australia they already have things like universal health care, you know, that "gimme" thing or whatever.
I know where he's from. I also know he doesn't want more immigrants than the outer cities of Australia can handle. Meanwhile, there's a huge chunk of inhabitable land in the center of Australia called 'the Outback.' It's only populated by about 700,000 aboriginals and Cyberdad thinks Australia should save that to preserve Australia's natural resources, while claiming how sh***y the rest of the world is for not cramming every living, breathing person possible on their land. So, of course he wants socialized everything, because how else could anyone afford that? He accomplishes two things: he makes sure Australia dodges an invasion and they aren't likely to relocate because they'll be getting free s**t from everyone else.
I have no use for Cyberdad's version of 'compassion' because it involves everyone else but him.
That's news to me.
_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin
beneficii wrote:
Persephone29 wrote:
beneficii wrote:
Persephone29 wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
I don't expect you folks to distinguish objectiveness from being an impartial snow-flake bleeding heart liberal.
Having socialist tendencies doesn't mean we are communists hell bent on destroying democracy
Having socialist tendencies doesn't mean we are communists hell bent on destroying democracy
The only thing I consistently expect from you is 'gimme.'
cyberdad is from Australia, and in Australia they already have things like universal health care, you know, that "gimme" thing or whatever.
I know where he's from. I also know he doesn't want more immigrants than the outer cities of Australia can handle. Meanwhile, there's a huge chunk of inhabitable land in the center of Australia called 'the Outback.' It's only populated by about 700,000 aboriginals and Cyberdad thinks Australia should save that to preserve Australia's natural resources, while claiming how sh***y the rest of the world is for not cramming every living, breathing person possible on their land. So, of course he wants socialized everything, because how else could anyone afford that? He accomplishes two things: he makes sure Australia dodges an invasion and they aren't likely to relocate because they'll be getting free s**t from everyone else.
I have no use for Cyberdad's version of 'compassion' because it involves everyone else but him.
That's news to me.
Hear Ye, Hear Ye
_________________
Disagreeing with you doesn't mean I hate you, it just means we disagree.
Neurocognitive exam in May 2019, diagnosed with ASD, Asperger's type in June 2019.
Ask Raleigh or Blue Bean, half of everything in the Outback can kill anyone. It's the poisonous species capital of the world.
Saying people should have somewhere to live is not an imposition upon your delicate sensibilities. Pro-immigration policies are directly correlated with fewer wars, famines & recessions.
_________________
"Standing on a well-chilled cinder, we see the fading of the suns, and try to recall the vanished brilliance of the origin of the worlds."
-Georges Lemaitre
"I fly through hyperspace, in my green computer interface"
-Gem Tos
cberg wrote:
Ask Raleigh or Blue Bean, half of everything in the Outback can kill anyone. It's the poisonous species capital of the world.
Saying people should have somewhere to live is not an imposition upon your delicate sensibilities. Pro-immigration policies are directly correlated with fewer wars, famines & recessions.
Saying people should have somewhere to live is not an imposition upon your delicate sensibilities. Pro-immigration policies are directly correlated with fewer wars, famines & recessions.
No s**t, Sherlock? I never would've guessed...
Yet there are still people living out there and not dying. Deserts are known for poisonous species, all deserts. Many of these people are desert dwelling individuals and are very used to checking bedding for snakes, scorpions, etc... You add a few more species to the warning education and Bob's your uncle.
_________________
Disagreeing with you doesn't mean I hate you, it just means we disagree.
Neurocognitive exam in May 2019, diagnosed with ASD, Asperger's type in June 2019.

