You say Muhammad was a man of his time. Well, I sort of agree with you then. Warlords of that time were evil bastards. Should Muslims look up to evil bastards as a matter of course? If I looked up to Adolf Hitler, people would call me a bigot. Why isn't looking up to a racist, a mass murderer, a totalitarian, a bigot, a slaver, a thief, a supremacist, an adulterer, a child marrier, a child rapist, and a warmonger considered bigotry?
kraftiekortie wrote:
We really don't hear the voices of moderate Islam enough, to be honest. If we heard more of these voices, there would probably be less Islamophobia.
Islamophobia doesn't exist. It's a term used to stifle criticism of Islam, and unkind comments about that deeply unpleasant ideology.
I'm not saying anti-Muslim bigotry doesn't exist. It does. And it should be stamped on, and it is when it's found.
There are some Muslims I would be honoured to call allies. But there aren't very many of them. For every Naser Khader, Maajid Nawaz and Usama Hasan, there's a Haitham al-Haddad, a Moazzam Begg, a Shakeel Begg or a Yusuf al-Qaradawi.
'Islamophobia' most times only ever exists because of how Muslims behave. It's not like anti-Semitism, where slurs and libels were cooked up in order to stir up hate against Jews.
Personally, I think anti-Semitism is a more serious ill in the world than anti-Muslim bigotry. Anti-Semitism runs deep in Islam, from Muhammad's time to the present day.