Page 4 of 9 [ 129 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 9  Next

EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

22 Dec 2016, 1:37 pm

Tollorin wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Yes umbrella term is exactly what I was thinking. Along with all purpose or one size fits all. I'm guessing the dark side is anything that's not leftist. It needs to be driven out so that the liberal/leftist way will dominate America and the West. The main thrust has been an attempt to marginalize by way of labeling people and drumming up fervor in the name of political correctness and social justice etc. Hillary Clinton represented a big leap forward, while Trump represents a huge setback.


No, it's not anything outside the left, it's anything with a racist, Antisemitic, nativist, ideology, often tied to fascism. If the mainstream American right doesn't want to be associated with this, and risk marginalization, they should be condemning the Alt Right, as so many of them had during the election.
And what's wrong with social justice?


I take it what you're saying is mainstream America needs to condemn anything or anyone that's been labeled/branded by the left as "alt-right". Or else they risk being marginalized by the Leftist movement. What's wrong with social justice is if "social justice" is just a euphemism for social control. I keep having thoughts of people being scarlet letter branded, accused of being "witches" and witch hunting, or those accused of being "Commies" and being blacklisted. As well as "thought police". You can't see a problem with this? They say a lot of Trump's voters are millennials, who I believe are seeing what I'm seeing, and that's even more true I believe of the post 2000 generation I belong to. And needless to say what's been going on with the left post election really makes the whole thing seem even more repellent. The riots. The harassment, stalking and death threats the electors suffered. All the threats of assassination. A very scary militant mob.

So to prevent the "extremist left" with no political power from taking over peoples need to go against moderate right politicians (Like are a lot of democrats and Clinton) and give power to the extreme right (Like the GOP is nowadays)? What could go wrong!? :roll:


I think it's more a matter of seeing attempts at trying to control how society speaks and thinks through labeling and branding, for what it is and not conforming to it. I think that form of manipulation has played itself out with the younger generations.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

22 Dec 2016, 6:36 pm

EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Yes umbrella term is exactly what I was thinking. Along with all purpose or one size fits all. I'm guessing the dark side is anything that's not leftist. It needs to be driven out so that the liberal/leftist way will dominate America and the West. The main thrust has been an attempt to marginalize by way of labeling people and drumming up fervor in the name of political correctness and social justice etc. Hillary Clinton represented a big leap forward, while Trump represents a huge setback.


No, it's not anything outside the left, it's anything with a racist, Antisemitic, nativist, ideology, often tied to fascism. If the mainstream American right doesn't want to be associated with this, and risk marginalization, they should be condemning the Alt Right, as so many of them had during the election.
And what's wrong with social justice?


I take it what you're saying is mainstream America needs to condemn anything or anyone that's been labeled/branded by the left as "alt-right". Or else they risk being marginalized by the Leftist movement. What's wrong with social justice is if "social justice" is just a euphemism for social control. I keep having thoughts of people being scarlet letter branded, accused of being "witches" and witch hunting, or those accused of being "Commies" and being blacklisted. As well as "thought police". You can't see a problem with this? They say a lot of Trump's voters are millennials, who I believe are seeing what I'm seeing, and that's even more true I believe of the post 2000 generation I belong to. And needless to say what's been going on with the left post election really makes the whole thing seem even more repellent. The riots. The harassment, stalking and death threats the electors suffered. All the threats of assassination. A very scary militant mob.


I'm saying the right needs to stop making use of their lunatic fringe, then just dismissing them, or even defending them, because they will otherwise be associated with said lunatic fringe. And why wouldn't anyone in their right mind, and with a soul, condemn such disgusting and unstable persons?


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

22 Dec 2016, 7:27 pm

For those peddling the idea that millennials supported Trump solely because the left are "corrupt" seem to conveniently forget that Trump was chosen over other republican candidates. What separated Trump from other republicans was opposition to immigration, multiculturalism and political correctness. You can also throw in his well known corruption in relation to his blatant misogyny, connections to unsavory organisations, tax returns, Trump University and his failed businesses There was no other policy differences that voters had to base their decision.

Trump's main message was conveyed through "alt-right" platforms such as 4chan and 8chan as well as through Briebart and Fox news. Remember that more than half of college educated white males and females support Donald Trump's policies. The loop was closed with the appointment of Briebart chair Steve Bannon as his chief strategist.

So who are the alt-right? it's a loose coalition of active right wing groups, ex-tea party conservatives and (apparently) millions of middle class white Americans who were perfectly aware of what Donald Trump stood for yet chose to elect him regardless. I'm guessing these people covertly support his socially degenerative anti-minority ideas.What I can't understand why so many educated white females support him despite his overt misogynistic actions/views?



wilburforce
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Sep 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,940

22 Dec 2016, 9:35 pm

cyberdad wrote:
I'm guessing these people covertly support his socially degenerative anti-minority ideas.


I'm guessing you're right about that.

cyberdad wrote:
What I can't understand why so many educated white females support him despite his overt misogynistic actions/views?


It's called internalised misogyny. I have known women who hate women and think men are superior, it's not unheard of, especially in older people who were raised in a time when sexism was more overt and institutionally reinforced--if that's what you're taught, if that's what your culture tells you, you might just believe it. Not everyone who was raised to believe men were superior took that message in and made it their truth, but some did.


_________________
"Ego non immanis, sed mea immanis telum." ~ Ares, God of War

(Note to Moderators: my warning number is wrong on my profile but apparently can't be fixed so I will note here that it is actually 2, not 3--the warning issued to me on Aug 20 2016 was a mistake but I've been told it can't be removed.)


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

23 Dec 2016, 12:57 am

wilburforce wrote:
It's called internalised misogyny. I have known women who hate women and think men are superior, it's not unheard of, especially in older people who were raised in a time when sexism was more overt and institutionally reinforced--if that's what you're taught, if that's what your culture tells you, you might just believe it. Not everyone who was raised to believe men were superior took that message in and made it their truth, but some did.


Yes this makes sense. If you can split the data by age and higher SES group it might favor older females for Trump
There is also evidence that younger white females in general don't care about issues such as mysogyny and race if they don't directly effect them...
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... mp-victory

I guess Trump the businessman and strong business leader to take over the US economy and protect them against the boogeyman of "rapist" muslims and Mexicans



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

23 Dec 2016, 1:58 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Yes umbrella term is exactly what I was thinking. Along with all purpose or one size fits all. I'm guessing the dark side is anything that's not leftist. It needs to be driven out so that the liberal/leftist way will dominate America and the West. The main thrust has been an attempt to marginalize by way of labeling people and drumming up fervor in the name of political correctness and social justice etc. Hillary Clinton represented a big leap forward, while Trump represents a huge setback.


No, it's not anything outside the left, it's anything with a racist, Antisemitic, nativist, ideology, often tied to fascism. If the mainstream American right doesn't want to be associated with this, and risk marginalization, they should be condemning the Alt Right, as so many of them had during the election.
And what's wrong with social justice?


I take it what you're saying is mainstream America needs to condemn anything or anyone that's been labeled/branded by the left as "alt-right". Or else they risk being marginalized by the Leftist movement. What's wrong with social justice is if "social justice" is just a euphemism for social control. I keep having thoughts of people being scarlet letter branded, accused of being "witches" and witch hunting, or those accused of being "Commies" and being blacklisted. As well as "thought police". You can't see a problem with this? They say a lot of Trump's voters are millennials, who I believe are seeing what I'm seeing, and that's even more true I believe of the post 2000 generation I belong to. And needless to say what's been going on with the left post election really makes the whole thing seem even more repellent. The riots. The harassment, stalking and death threats the electors suffered. All the threats of assassination. A very scary militant mob.


I'm saying the right needs to stop making use of their lunatic fringe, then just dismissing them, or even defending them, because they will otherwise be associated with said lunatic fringe. And why wouldn't anyone in their right mind, and with a soul, condemn such disgusting and unstable persons?


This just goes back to trying to control others. Guilt by association equals control through labeling, based on the liberals judgement of what constitutes a nebulous lunatic fringe and what constitutes association with it. The key factor is credibility. And in my opinion the level credibility as a whole, is at an all time low.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

23 Dec 2016, 3:05 am

EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Yes umbrella term is exactly what I was thinking. Along with all purpose or one size fits all. I'm guessing the dark side is anything that's not leftist. It needs to be driven out so that the liberal/leftist way will dominate America and the West. The main thrust has been an attempt to marginalize by way of labeling people and drumming up fervor in the name of political correctness and social justice etc. Hillary Clinton represented a big leap forward, while Trump represents a huge setback.


No, it's not anything outside the left, it's anything with a racist, Antisemitic, nativist, ideology, often tied to fascism. If the mainstream American right doesn't want to be associated with this, and risk marginalization, they should be condemning the Alt Right, as so many of them had during the election.
And what's wrong with social justice?


I take it what you're saying is mainstream America needs to condemn anything or anyone that's been labeled/branded by the left as "alt-right". Or else they risk being marginalized by the Leftist movement. What's wrong with social justice is if "social justice" is just a euphemism for social control. I keep having thoughts of people being scarlet letter branded, accused of being "witches" and witch hunting, or those accused of being "Commies" and being blacklisted. As well as "thought police". You can't see a problem with this? They say a lot of Trump's voters are millennials, who I believe are seeing what I'm seeing, and that's even more true I believe of the post 2000 generation I belong to. And needless to say what's been going on with the left post election really makes the whole thing seem even more repellent. The riots. The harassment, stalking and death threats the electors suffered. All the threats of assassination. A very scary militant mob.


I'm saying the right needs to stop making use of their lunatic fringe, then just dismissing them, or even defending them, because they will otherwise be associated with said lunatic fringe. And why wouldn't anyone in their right mind, and with a soul, condemn such disgusting and unstable persons?


This just goes back to trying to control others. Guilt by association equals control through labeling, based on the liberals judgement of what constitutes a nebulous lunatic fringe and what constitutes association with it. The key factor is credibility. And in my opinion the level credibility as a whole, is at an all time low.

.

Lay down with dogs, and you get fleas.
And a nebulous lunatic fringe? Aint nothing nebulous about people who want an all white, all Christian America. That's who and what the Alt Right is. The choice is simple: have nothing to do with these sacks of roaches, or risk being labeled as part of them by making political alliances with them. It doesn't have anything to do with credibility, or lack of it, based on political prejudice on the part of liberals or anyone else when the hateful ideology the Alt Right believe in is so obvious.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

23 Dec 2016, 4:28 am

EzraS wrote:
based on the liberals judgement of what constitutes a nebulous lunatic fringe and what constitutes association with it.

Out of the mouth of babes :wink:
The proof of the pudding is what these Alt-right people say - they are the ones who peddle lunatic ideas, please give yourself a chance to listen to the speeches of Richard Spencer or read articles by Trump's chief strategist Steve Bannon and you may think twice before giving oxygen to their crazy ideas...

EzraS wrote:
The key factor is credibility. And in my opinion the level credibility as a whole, is at an all time low.

I'm not going to draw attention that you are still in high-school and are yet to experience the real world, if the environment you are in teaches you that Trump is credible then that is what you are conditioned to believe. I think you are smart and hope that one day you can critically weigh up the evidence.



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

23 Dec 2016, 10:18 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Yes umbrella term is exactly what I was thinking. Along with all purpose or one size fits all. I'm guessing the dark side is anything that's not leftist. It needs to be driven out so that the liberal/leftist way will dominate America and the West. The main thrust has been an attempt to marginalize by way of labeling people and drumming up fervor in the name of political correctness and social justice etc. Hillary Clinton represented a big leap forward, while Trump represents a huge setback.


No, it's not anything outside the left, it's anything with a racist, Antisemitic, nativist, ideology, often tied to fascism. If the mainstream American right doesn't want to be associated with this, and risk marginalization, they should be condemning the Alt Right, as so many of them had during the election.
And what's wrong with social justice?


I take it what you're saying is mainstream America needs to condemn anything or anyone that's been labeled/branded by the left as "alt-right". Or else they risk being marginalized by the Leftist movement. What's wrong with social justice is if "social justice" is just a euphemism for social control. I keep having thoughts of people being scarlet letter branded, accused of being "witches" and witch hunting, or those accused of being "Commies" and being blacklisted. As well as "thought police". You can't see a problem with this? They say a lot of Trump's voters are millennials, who I believe are seeing what I'm seeing, and that's even more true I believe of the post 2000 generation I belong to. And needless to say what's been going on with the left post election really makes the whole thing seem even more repellent. The riots. The harassment, stalking and death threats the electors suffered. All the threats of assassination. A very scary militant mob.


I'm saying the right needs to stop making use of their lunatic fringe, then just dismissing them, or even defending them, because they will otherwise be associated with said lunatic fringe. And why wouldn't anyone in their right mind, and with a soul, condemn such disgusting and unstable persons?


This just goes back to trying to control others. Guilt by association equals control through labeling, based on the liberals judgement of what constitutes a nebulous lunatic fringe and what constitutes association with it. The key factor is credibility. And in my opinion the level credibility as a whole, is at an all time low.

.

Lay down with dogs, and you get fleas.
And a nebulous lunatic fringe? Aint nothing nebulous about people who want an all white, all Christian America. That's who and what the Alt Right is. The choice is simple: have nothing to do with these sacks of roaches, or risk being labeled as part of them by making political alliances with them. It doesn't have anything to do with credibility, or lack of it, based on political prejudice on the part of liberals or anyone else when the hateful ideology the Alt Right believe in is so obvious.


They are nebulous due to their anonymous online existence and the uncertainty of their exact motives. Their main outlet, the posting of memes of 4-chan and 8-chan, could easily just be pranksters out to ruffle feathers. And apparently they've hijacked Pepe the Frog as their spokesperson. Internet boogeymen. A virtual mythos. Tinfoil hat material.



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

23 Dec 2016, 10:35 am

cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
based on the liberals judgement of what constitutes a nebulous lunatic fringe and what constitutes association with it.

Out of the mouth of babes :wink:
The proof of the pudding is what these Alt-right people say - they are the ones who peddle lunatic ideas, please give yourself a chance to listen to the speeches of Richard Spencer or read articles by Trump's chief strategist Steve Bannon and you may think twice before giving oxygen to their crazy ideas...


As presented in Pepe the Frog memes.

cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
The key factor is credibility. And in my opinion the level credibility as a whole, is at an all time low.

I'm not going to draw attention that you are still in high-school and are yet to experience the real world, if the environment you are in teaches you that Trump is credible then that is what you are conditioned to believe. I think you are smart and hope that one day you can critically weigh up the evidence.


If you mean where I live, I live in one of the most predominantly liberal areas in the US. No one has been sitting me on their knee teaching me about Trump credibility, nor have I been conditioned in any way to favor Trump. That's the thing, I came into this with no preconceived political viewpoint. I am examining, evaluating and challenging in a detached objective manner. Critically weighing up the evidence is the only sensible approach. That is what I have been taught and conditioned to do.



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 38,085
Location: Long Island, New York

23 Dec 2016, 10:41 am

cyberdad wrote:
I'm not going to draw attention that you are still in high-school and are yet to experience the real world

You did exactly that.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


Tollorin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jun 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,178
Location: Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada

23 Dec 2016, 11:40 am

EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
The key factor is credibility. And in my opinion the level credibility as a whole, is at an all time low.

I'm not going to draw attention that you are still in high-school and are yet to experience the real world, if the environment you are in teaches you that Trump is credible then that is what you are conditioned to believe. I think you are smart and hope that one day you can critically weigh up the evidence.


If you mean where I live, I live in one of the most predominantly liberal areas in the US. No one has been sitting me on their knee teaching me about Trump credibility, nor have I been conditioned in any way to favor Trump. That's the thing, I came into this with no preconceived political viewpoint. I am examining, evaluating and challenging in a detached objective manner. Critically weighing up the evidence is the only sensible approach. That is what I have been taught and conditioned to do.

You lack perspective however. You came to the be attentive to politic only recently and what you see is peoples of liberal positions in panic from the election of Trump and you conclude that they are hysterical, what you don't see however is that the US right has become more extreme with years, that the less extremist George W. Bush two mandates have been absolutely catastrophic because of his ideologies and the consequence of them still linger on the world and that Trump is what the left feared (Along with the even worst catastrophes coming with it) the right would end bring to the table for years. Also Trump say so many stupid things it's impossible to point them all and a lot of what he say along with his behavior would have destroyed the political career of anyone, but it don't end affecting him, or at least very little, meaning he's for the time being and the next few years, politically invincible. Peoples who are aware of history have good reasons too to fear someone like Trump, as the content of his speech are quite reminiscent of peoples such as Hitler; things may not turn up as bad as the third Reich, but they still likely to turn very bad, particularly if Trump is actually keeping up with his promises. Politic also have become much more nasty since he has come and Trump nasty behavior was not something that could be seen in politic (At least not in USA or Canada) a few years ago.


_________________
Down with speculators!! !


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

23 Dec 2016, 11:53 am

EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Yes umbrella term is exactly what I was thinking. Along with all purpose or one size fits all. I'm guessing the dark side is anything that's not leftist. It needs to be driven out so that the liberal/leftist way will dominate America and the West. The main thrust has been an attempt to marginalize by way of labeling people and drumming up fervor in the name of political correctness and social justice etc. Hillary Clinton represented a big leap forward, while Trump represents a huge setback.


No, it's not anything outside the left, it's anything with a racist, Antisemitic, nativist, ideology, often tied to fascism. If the mainstream American right doesn't want to be associated with this, and risk marginalization, they should be condemning the Alt Right, as so many of them had during the election.
And what's wrong with social justice?


I take it what you're saying is mainstream America needs to condemn anything or anyone that's been labeled/branded by the left as "alt-right". Or else they risk being marginalized by the Leftist movement. What's wrong with social justice is if "social justice" is just a euphemism for social control. I keep having thoughts of people being scarlet letter branded, accused of being "witches" and witch hunting, or those accused of being "Commies" and being blacklisted. As well as "thought police". You can't see a problem with this? They say a lot of Trump's voters are millennials, who I believe are seeing what I'm seeing, and that's even more true I believe of the post 2000 generation I belong to. And needless to say what's been going on with the left post election really makes the whole thing seem even more repellent. The riots. The harassment, stalking and death threats the electors suffered. All the threats of assassination. A very scary militant mob.


I'm saying the right needs to stop making use of their lunatic fringe, then just dismissing them, or even defending them, because they will otherwise be associated with said lunatic fringe. And why wouldn't anyone in their right mind, and with a soul, condemn such disgusting and unstable persons?


This just goes back to trying to control others. Guilt by association equals control through labeling, based on the liberals judgement of what constitutes a nebulous lunatic fringe and what constitutes association with it. The key factor is credibility. And in my opinion the level credibility as a whole, is at an all time low.

.

Lay down with dogs, and you get fleas.
And a nebulous lunatic fringe? Aint nothing nebulous about people who want an all white, all Christian America. That's who and what the Alt Right is. The choice is simple: have nothing to do with these sacks of roaches, or risk being labeled as part of them by making political alliances with them. It doesn't have anything to do with credibility, or lack of it, based on political prejudice on the part of liberals or anyone else when the hateful ideology the Alt Right believe in is so obvious.


They are nebulous due to their anonymous online existence and the uncertainty of their exact motives. Their main outlet, the posting of memes of 4-chan and 8-chan, could easily just be pranksters out to ruffle feathers. And apparently they've hijacked Pepe the Frog as their spokesperson. Internet boogeymen. A virtual mythos. Tinfoil hat material.


What, are you implying that all that online hate is really evil liberal agent provocateurs out to besmirch the good names of honest alt righters? That the Alt Right aren't actually a bunch of kooks and lunatics?


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


wilburforce
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Sep 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,940

23 Dec 2016, 2:28 pm

EzraS wrote:

They are nebulous due to their anonymous online existence and the uncertainty of their exact motives. Their main outlet, the posting of memes of 4-chan and 8-chan, could easily just be pranksters out to ruffle feathers. And apparently they've hijacked Pepe the Frog as their spokesperson. Internet boogeymen. A virtual mythos. Tinfoil hat material.


They are not just online, there are real humans with names leading the alt-right:

Quote:
"While many of its racist views are well known — that President Obama is, or may as well be, of foreign birth; that the Black Lives Matter movement is another name for black race rioters; that even the American-born children of undocumented Hispanic immigrants should be deported — the alt-right has been difficult to define. Is it a name for right-wing political provocateurs in the internet era? Or is it a political movement defined by xenophobia and a dislike for political correctness?

At the conference on Saturday, Mr. Spencer, who said he had coined the term, defined the alt-right as a movement with white identity as its core idea.

“We’ve crossed the Rubicon in terms of recognition,” Mr. Spencer said at the conference, which was sponsored by his organization, the National Policy Institute."


NYT: Alt-Right Gathering Exults in Trump Election With Nazi-Era Salute


_________________
"Ego non immanis, sed mea immanis telum." ~ Ares, God of War

(Note to Moderators: my warning number is wrong on my profile but apparently can't be fixed so I will note here that it is actually 2, not 3--the warning issued to me on Aug 20 2016 was a mistake but I've been told it can't be removed.)


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

23 Dec 2016, 4:01 pm

wilburforce wrote:
EzraS wrote:

They are nebulous due to their anonymous online existence and the uncertainty of their exact motives. Their main outlet, the posting of memes of 4-chan and 8-chan, could easily just be pranksters out to ruffle feathers. And apparently they've hijacked Pepe the Frog as their spokesperson. Internet boogeymen. A virtual mythos. Tinfoil hat material.


wilburforce wrote:
They are not just online, there are real humans with names leading the alt-right:


Well I figured real humans were behind all the alt-right memes on the internet. What are their names?

wilburforce wrote:
Quote:
"While many of its racist views are well known — that President Obama is, or may as well be, of foreign birth; that the Black Lives Matter movement is another name for black race rioters; that even the American-born children of undocumented Hispanic immigrants should be deported — the alt-right has been difficult to define. Is it a name for right-wing political provocateurs in the internet era? Or is it a political movement defined by xenophobia and a dislike for political correctness?

At the conference on Saturday, Mr. Spencer, who said he had coined the term, defined the alt-right as a movement with white identity as its core idea.

“We’ve crossed the Rubicon in terms of recognition,” Mr. Spencer said at the conference, which was sponsored by his organization, the National Policy Institute."


NYT: Alt-Right Gathering Exults in Trump Election With Nazi-Era Salute


From what I gather the term "alt-right" didn't exists until Spencer invented it. In other words it appears there was no group calling themselves "alt-right" before then. So it seems possible anyone calling themselves "alt-right" since then are playing around with the term Spencer invented. The question in my mind still remains, is there really an "alt-right" or is it more of an invented mythos? I'm leaning towards the latter for now.



Last edited by EzraS on 23 Dec 2016, 4:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

23 Dec 2016, 4:20 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:

They are nebulous due to their anonymous online existence and the uncertainty of their exact motives. Their main outlet, the posting of memes of 4-chan and 8-chan, could easily just be pranksters out to ruffle feathers. And apparently they've hijacked Pepe the Frog as their spokesperson. Internet boogeymen. A virtual mythos. Tinfoil hat material.


What, are you implying that all that online hate is really evil liberal agent provocateurs out to besmirch the good names of honest alt righters? That the Alt Right aren't actually a bunch of kooks and lunatics?


No that's you putting words in my mouth. I'm saying they could be any number of different people with any number of different agendas. Now take any real group like the Hell's Angels or the Girl Scouts or whoever and you'll see they had a founding member and founding members and were establish on a particular date etc. Can you do that with the "alt-right"? I mean other than Pepe the Frog.

Image