Page 4 of 5 [ 76 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

09 Dec 2016, 3:03 pm

QuillAlba wrote:
The 'people' who voted for brexit had no idea what they were actually voting for.

We still haven't heard the tories plan for brexit.

You cannot compare the SNP and UKIP, as the SNP only stand in Scotland and not UK-wide.
The SNP are the most popular party in Scotland by a long way, they are a decent bunch who do a good job with what we have, I am a member because they are the vehicle for regaining full control of our country from the worthless fools in westminster.

England is in the hands of fascists, it's becoming a lost cause and we will not be dragged down with them. :heart:


That's false. I knew exactly what I was voting for. To leave the European Union and the Single Market.

Because they either haven't got one or are keep their cards close to their chest.

Hopefully Scotland will have another referendum and leave the UK, though if that was actually allowed to happen the Scottish people might be told they weren't sure what they were voting for. I think any immigrant or refugee should go to Scotland then an actual nationalist party would form to fight the left wing fascists that are the SNP.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

09 Dec 2016, 3:08 pm

QuillAlba wrote:
I have zero interest in UKIP, they got very few votes in Scotland and we chased that racist fargage into a pub when he tried to spew his crap up here.

The EU is very useful for trade deals, it has other uses but trade is number one.

We will rule Scotland from Scotland, as it should be, an equal partner in Europe.

It's in the EU's interests to keep Scotland close and sweet, we hold all the cards, look up Europe's oil and gas reserves, not to mention our fishing waters. We are spoiled for energy when you throw in our Wind Farms, Hydro and new ocean current technology.

We don't need westminster, nor do we want them.

The UK is done and over, it's been kept on life support by Scotland's oil mostly, we will fund English terrorism no more.

The UK may need to kick us out to activate Brexit, as it's a Union and as an equal nation we have a say.

We will have our independence and without a shot being fired, or a right wing nutter killing an MP in the street.

Also, we tell Trump to piss off, that mental orange freak has tweeted 53 times about scottish wind farms opposite his golf course, we're gonnae dig it up and build a mosque.

Hoping for a 2018 indyref2, it's coming and there is nothing you can do, be nice and we might liberate you from Trump LOL.


You've had your say as part of the union and lost.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


QuillAlba
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jul 2015
Age: 48
Posts: 2,739
Location: Scotland

09 Dec 2016, 3:35 pm

Biscuitman wrote:
QuillAlba wrote:
The UK is done and over, it's been kept on life support by Scotland's oil mostly


North Sea oil has made a loss in the last 2 years. It has actually cost the UK money just to keep it going.


It's very useful to borrow against though.

It's a very large asset even when not running a massive profit, and it's current state has much to do with mismanagement.
I dismiss views that oil is not an asset, it's just being silly.



Biscuitman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,665
Location: Dunking jammy dodgers

09 Dec 2016, 3:41 pm

Scotland is certainly somewhere I would consider moving to if they left the UK and joined the EU.

I would wonder about the state of their economy if they left the UK though. As a country they have been making a net financial loss for quite a number of years, then they would take a fair chunk of the UK's national debt with them and North Sea oil now doesn't even make any profit anymore.



Biscuitman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,665
Location: Dunking jammy dodgers

09 Dec 2016, 3:44 pm

QuillAlba wrote:
Biscuitman wrote:
QuillAlba wrote:
The UK is done and over, it's been kept on life support by Scotland's oil mostly


North Sea oil has made a loss in the last 2 years. It has actually cost the UK money just to keep it going.


It's very useful to borrow against though.

It's a very large asset even when not running a massive profit, and it's current state has much to do with mismanagement.
I dismiss views that oil is not an asset, it's just being silly.


It's an asset when oil prices are high, but now they are not and are predicted to stay low for the foreseeable. Scotland also has no influence over the value of oil, any smaller oil producing nation that relies on oil to sustain their economy is literally at the mercy of Saudi's & Russians.



Last edited by Biscuitman on 09 Dec 2016, 3:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

QuillAlba
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jul 2015
Age: 48
Posts: 2,739
Location: Scotland

09 Dec 2016, 3:46 pm

We cannot make a loss as a country, it's impossible under current circumstances.

We'd need to have full fiscal control to make a loss, any loss we make is westminsters, we have zero control in real terms.

Scotland is actually a relatively rich country for it's population, it's badly mismanaged by UK.



QuillAlba
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jul 2015
Age: 48
Posts: 2,739
Location: Scotland

09 Dec 2016, 3:48 pm

Biscuitman wrote:
QuillAlba wrote:
Biscuitman wrote:
QuillAlba wrote:
The UK is done and over, it's been kept on life support by Scotland's oil mostly


North Sea oil has made a loss in the last 2 years. It has actually cost the UK money just to keep it going.


It's very useful to borrow against though.

It's a very large asset even when not running a massive profit, and it's current state has much to do with mismanagement.
I dismiss views that oil is not an asset, it's just being silly.


It's an asset when oil prices are high, but now they are not and are predicted to stay low for the foreseeable. The UK also have no influence over the value of oil, any smaller oil producing nation that relies on oil to sustain their economy is literally at the mercy of Saudi's & Russians.


Ok.

Oil is a very bad thing.
Why are companies still bidding for drilling rights in Scotland then?
New fields are opening up, maybe someone is feeding you lies about Scotland, like your unionist press owned by billionaires who like having tories in their pocket and in charge.



Biscuitman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,665
Location: Dunking jammy dodgers

09 Dec 2016, 3:53 pm

Tax contributions by Scotland in 12-13 were £53.1B with total public spending in Scotland at 65.2B. And that is if you put all north sea oil and gas tax contributions against Scotland numbers rather than the UK's as a whole.



Biscuitman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,665
Location: Dunking jammy dodgers

09 Dec 2016, 4:04 pm

QuillAlba wrote:
Biscuitman wrote:
QuillAlba wrote:
Biscuitman wrote:
QuillAlba wrote:
The UK is done and over, it's been kept on life support by Scotland's oil mostly


North Sea oil has made a loss in the last 2 years. It has actually cost the UK money just to keep it going.


It's very useful to borrow against though.

It's a very large asset even when not running a massive profit, and it's current state has much to do with mismanagement.
I dismiss views that oil is not an asset, it's just being silly.


It's an asset when oil prices are high, but now they are not and are predicted to stay low for the foreseeable. The UK also have no influence over the value of oil, any smaller oil producing nation that relies on oil to sustain their economy is literally at the mercy of Saudi's & Russians.


Ok.

Oil is a very bad thing.
Why are companies still bidding for drilling rights in Scotland then?
New fields are opening up, maybe someone is feeding you lies about Scotland, like your unionist press owned by billionaires who like having tories in their pocket and in charge.


Why make silly accusations like that? Scotland's financial situation is very well established and has been discussed publicly a number of times.

You also have to keep in mind that the north sea oil would very likely not all go to Scotland either.



QuillAlba
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jul 2015
Age: 48
Posts: 2,739
Location: Scotland

09 Dec 2016, 4:45 pm

It's in Scottish waters, whatever lies within is ours.

I already explained why it is not possible for Scotland to run at a loss or profit, are you pretending to be blind?

The UK government allocates a grant to Scotland, we have no control over our nation's finances, we cannot raise more money just as we cannot actually lose any money.
You are just regurgitating right wing press nonsense and clearly have no actual grasp of the situation as you are ignoring the fact that Scotland cannot run at a loss or profit as part of the UK.
Just think about what you are saying, or regurgitating in this case and stop believing everything you read in your daily rag.



Biscuitman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,665
Location: Dunking jammy dodgers

09 Dec 2016, 5:46 pm

QuillAlba wrote:
It's in Scottish waters, whatever lies within is ours.


If that is as far as your thinking takes you then good luck with everything.

The UK Continental Shelf might disagree somewhat though :lol:



QuillAlba
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jul 2015
Age: 48
Posts: 2,739
Location: Scotland

09 Dec 2016, 5:49 pm

The UK doesn't exist without Scotland.

Peace and Love, I'm drinking ale and can no longer engage in this discussion.

You are welcome to come and live in Scotland, it'll be better than Tory England, our football team is shite though, so it'll be sort of the same as being English.



Feyokien
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Dec 2014
Age: 29
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,303
Location: The Northern Waste

09 Dec 2016, 8:05 pm

Jacoby wrote:
The context of what I said about the Democrats was their not listening to voters and their false paternalism masking the fact that they are the actual oppressors. I am not a Republican, I strongly supported Trump but also the Clintons have always been enemy #1 having known of their wickedness all my life. There was nothing on this earth that could convinced me to vote for Hillary and I was not alone in these feelings, Democrats should kick themselves for letting their party and nominating process become so corrupted that such a unacceptable candidate like Hillary would receive the nomination. I always had 100% confidence in defeating Hillary and was warning people of such for years, she had no business being where she was at which is why she limited her appearances so much and never took questions. Democrats actually did have a strong candidate in Jim Webb the 'progressive' national party found him unacceptably conservative for not playing the identity politics game and for actually trying to appeal to working class white voters which are necessary to win any election.


And what is the point of any of this? We're talking about the electoral college, not the primaries. Deflection....

Jacoby wrote:
Can you stop breaking up my posts like that, are you doing it to annoy me? Do you enjoy sitting there formatting your post to do that?


No I'm doing it to clearing explain my point on every point. I don't like walls of text, they can easily be misinterpreted.

Jacoby wrote:
There is proof the voter fraud that voter fraud happened but we have secret ballots so holding people accountable is pretty hard, there is massive fraud when it comes to absentee ballots. Something like half the precincts in Detroit had machines that tabulated more voters than ballots, lots and lots of funny business happens. Big city democrats have been perpetrating fraud for decades, the 1960 election was decided fraud in Chicago under Mayor Daley's watch. Not baseless, part of history, maybe ask your professor.


Where? :D Still baseless and just noise. The only thing I could find was Republicans at the time of the 1960 election whining much like some Democrats are doing today. Without sustainable proof it is meaningless and lost to the depths of time now.

Jacoby wrote:
It's just common sense it has never stopped since it ha worked and as we can see the corruption out of Chicago is still palpable. I saw tentacles of it first hand up in Milwaukee which has serious issues with it as well. I bring up undue burden because that is the main argument against combating voter fraud, that it somehow specifically targets minority voters which is such a lie. Do you support voter ID, do you think loopholes that allow fraud should be closed? If you agree with that then what are you arguing about?


More deflecting


Jacoby wrote:
What is ugly about it? Slavery was not a unique institution, it had exist since the dawn of man up and still does in other forms/other countries. It was wrong and the most deadly war in American history is what ended it. I feel no guilt for something I did not partake in, what the specific issues were at the time are irrelevant to the fact that the purpose was to preserve state sovereignty which is the basis of our country. I do not subscribe to this idea that because the founders had slaves that everything they believed and stood should no longer be valued, if California and New York decided our elections then there would be no reason for other states to not secede.


You weren't supposed to feel guilt. You were supposed to take away the fact that the elector system was instituted because certain states had extreme suffrage limitations like the south so they wanted to expand their power without giving rights to slaves and others. Still in effect today, I consider it an American issue, not the issue of a single party.

California and New York don't decide our elections nor would they based on the popular vote......that's such a misused factoid. 40% of Iowan voters and every other political group that is the minority in their state along with all the majority voters in their respective states would decide the elections in a very fair and modern way, instead of winner take all nonsense.

Jacoby wrote:
Now I think changes to our system aren't a bad idea but the president will never be elected by the popular vote. I like the idea of radically expanding congress so districts do not exceed 70k repealing the 17th amendment so the senate can represent that states as it was originally intended, it makes no sense for the senate to be a supercongress. You don't have to radically expand that much or repeal the 17th, at the very least it should be expanded to the point that districts are evenly populated. Donald Trump won the election that way the rules required, trying to say Trump is illegitimate because of it is wrong and if the election was decided by the popular vote then the campaign would of looked a lot different so what the result actually was is irrelevant in that scenario. Democrats if they want to win elections need to try to appeal to the middle of the country or else they will continue to lose.


I don't think I'm arguing Trumps legitimacy anymore....I'm more interested in fixing the system so future elections can be representative of the American people, an actual democracy. This whole thing started with your misuse of the word democracy.



Last edited by Feyokien on 09 Dec 2016, 8:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,300

09 Dec 2016, 8:19 pm

QuillAlba wrote:
The UK doesn't exist without Scotland.

Peace and Love, I'm drinking ale and can no longer engage in this discussion.

You are welcome to come and live in Scotland, it'll be better than Tory England, our football team is shite though, so it'll be sort of the same as being English.


Isn't Trump Scottish? any chance you guys could take him back :cry:



QuillAlba
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jul 2015
Age: 48
Posts: 2,739
Location: Scotland

09 Dec 2016, 8:29 pm

He's American.

Yours dude, nothing to do with us.

We hate him too, he's a total dickhead.



Feyokien
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Dec 2014
Age: 29
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,303
Location: The Northern Waste

09 Dec 2016, 8:41 pm

cyberdad wrote:
QuillAlba wrote:
The UK doesn't exist without Scotland.

Peace and Love, I'm drinking ale and can no longer engage in this discussion.

You are welcome to come and live in Scotland, it'll be better than Tory England, our football team is shite though, so it'll be sort of the same as being English.


Isn't Trump Scottish? any chance you guys could take him back :cry:


Drumpf is of German origin. He's definitely American though