Trump thinks the Moon is part of Mars
naturalplastic wrote:
SaveFerris wrote:
Alls fair in love and war or so the saying goes unless it seems you are a Trump Supporter then you are apparently fair game .
Let me remind all of you of the rules listed in the PPR sub forum
Using neologisms like Trumpites or Trumpoids doesn't distance you from the rules.
Let me remind all of you of the rules listed in the PPR sub forum
Quote:
While it is acceptable to attack and debate beliefs (political, religious etc) it is not acceptable to make generalised attacks on the adherents of those beliefs. It is acceptable to say that Republicanism, Liberalism, Christianity, Islam are stupid but not acceptable to make generalised attacks saying that Republicans, Liberals, Christians or Muslims are morons. You could say that some of these people are stupid because of (reason) but not make generalised attacks on groups of people. Similarly you could not say "Christians are morons" or "Muslims are terrorists" or "People on welfare are bums". Confine your attacks to the beliefs and politics, not the people holding them. The one exception to this is public figures themselves – by the very nature of their roles they are personally open to criticism
Using neologisms like Trumpites or Trumpoids doesn't distance you from the rules.
You oughta redo this post to make it more direct and less confusing.
First off: the expression "all is fair in love and war" means "you can do what ever you want in courtship, or in war, because there are (supposedly) no rules in those two realms". The exact opposite of what you seem to think that it means. Ergo if Trump supporters are fair game then they would NOT be an exception to that ( because if "all is fair" then everyone would be fair game regardless of their support of Trump).
Apparently what you MEANT was "despite the old saying...all is NOT fair. There are rules on WP. And one of the rules is you cant attack groups of people. And that includes Trump supporters". Something like that.
You had me second guessing myself and believing I was more autistic than I thought with regards to idioms. The meds I'm on have given me mild aphasia so I had to check.
Merriam Webster gives this definition
"used to describe a situation in which people do not follow the usual rules of behavior and do things that are normally considered unfair"
I believe I used the idiom correctly.
_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1
Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard
SaveFerris wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
SaveFerris wrote:
Alls fair in love and war or so the saying goes unless it seems you are a Trump Supporter then you are apparently fair game .
Let me remind all of you of the rules listed in the PPR sub forum
Using neologisms like Trumpites or Trumpoids doesn't distance you from the rules.
Let me remind all of you of the rules listed in the PPR sub forum
Quote:
While it is acceptable to attack and debate beliefs (political, religious etc) it is not acceptable to make generalised attacks on the adherents of those beliefs. It is acceptable to say that Republicanism, Liberalism, Christianity, Islam are stupid but not acceptable to make generalised attacks saying that Republicans, Liberals, Christians or Muslims are morons. You could say that some of these people are stupid because of (reason) but not make generalised attacks on groups of people. Similarly you could not say "Christians are morons" or "Muslims are terrorists" or "People on welfare are bums". Confine your attacks to the beliefs and politics, not the people holding them. The one exception to this is public figures themselves – by the very nature of their roles they are personally open to criticism
Using neologisms like Trumpites or Trumpoids doesn't distance you from the rules.
You oughta redo this post to make it more direct and less confusing.
First off: the expression "all is fair in love and war" means "you can do what ever you want in courtship, or in war, because there are (supposedly) no rules in those two realms". The exact opposite of what you seem to think that it means. Ergo if Trump supporters are fair game then they would NOT be an exception to that ( because if "all is fair" then everyone would be fair game regardless of their support of Trump).
Apparently what you MEANT was "despite the old saying...all is NOT fair. There are rules on WP. And one of the rules is you cant attack groups of people. And that includes Trump supporters". Something like that.
You had me second guessing myself and believing I was more autistic than I thought with regards to idioms. The meds I'm on have given me mild aphasia so I had to check.
Merriam Webster gives this definition
"used to describe a situation in which people do not follow the usual rules of behavior and do things that are normally considered unfair"
I believe I used the idiom correctly.
Bugger! You are right , I got it wrong
I think by now members should know what I'm getting at due to the last couple of posts
I think I should steer away from idioms where modding is concerned.
Glad this didn't happen in real life - I feel shame now
_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1
Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,260
Location: the island of defective toy santas
naturalplastic wrote:
He is the POTUS, and not some speech impaired autistic child after all.
he reminds me of Biff on B2TF who would say "make like a tree and get outta here!" one doesn't have to be a brain doc to discern some mental deterioration on his part, relative to how sharp he useta be just 10 years ago.
naturalplastic wrote:
Well.. we Americans elected a guy POTUS who cant even form a sentence. So I guess we can forgive you for occasionally misspeaking. 
Nicely brought back on topic , quick , make lots of posts so my shame gets buried.
_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1
Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,260
Location: the island of defective toy santas
SaveFerris wrote:
Alls fair in love and war or so the saying goes unless it seems you are a Trump Supporter then you are apparently fair game .
Let me remind all of you of the rules listed in the PPR sub forum
Using neologisms like Trumpites or Trumpoids doesn't distance you from the rules.
Let me remind all of you of the rules listed in the PPR sub forum
Quote:
While it is acceptable to attack and debate beliefs (political, religious etc) it is not acceptable to make generalised attacks on the adherents of those beliefs. It is acceptable to say that Republicanism, Liberalism, Christianity, Islam are stupid but not acceptable to make generalised attacks saying that Republicans, Liberals, Christians or Muslims are morons. You could say that some of these people are stupid because of (reason) but not make generalised attacks on groups of people. Similarly you could not say "Christians are morons" or "Muslims are terrorists" or "People on welfare are bums". Confine your attacks to the beliefs and politics, not the people holding them. The one exception to this is public figures themselves – by the very nature of their roles they are personally open to criticism
Using neologisms like Trumpites or Trumpoids doesn't distance you from the rules.
So... making jokes about Trump's (or any other politican's) views = okay, making fun of a specific group, like a certain politicans supporters, = not okay?
cyberdad wrote:
what the heck is an idiom
Idiom
cyberdad wrote:
and neologism??
neologism
cyberdad wrote:
and how did I breach the WP code of conduct?
Quote:
While it is acceptable to attack and debate beliefs (political, religious etc) it is not acceptable to make generalised attacks on the adherents of those beliefs. It is acceptable to say that Republicanism, Liberalism, Christianity, Islam are stupid but not acceptable to make generalised attacks saying that Republicans, Liberals, Christians or Muslims are morons. You could say that some of these people are stupid because of (reason) but not make generalised attacks on groups of people. Similarly you could not say "Christians are morons" or "Muslims are terrorists" or "People on welfare are bums". Confine your attacks to the beliefs and politics, not the people holding them. The one exception to this is public figures themselves – by the very nature of their roles they are personally open to criticism
_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1
Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard
Fireblossom wrote:
SaveFerris wrote:
Alls fair in love and war or so the saying goes unless it seems you are a Trump Supporter then you are apparently fair game .
Let me remind all of you of the rules listed in the PPR sub forum
Using neologisms like Trumpites or Trumpoids doesn't distance you from the rules.
Let me remind all of you of the rules listed in the PPR sub forum
Quote:
While it is acceptable to attack and debate beliefs (political, religious etc) it is not acceptable to make generalised attacks on the adherents of those beliefs. It is acceptable to say that Republicanism, Liberalism, Christianity, Islam are stupid but not acceptable to make generalised attacks saying that Republicans, Liberals, Christians or Muslims are morons. You could say that some of these people are stupid because of (reason) but not make generalised attacks on groups of people. Similarly you could not say "Christians are morons" or "Muslims are terrorists" or "People on welfare are bums". Confine your attacks to the beliefs and politics, not the people holding them. The one exception to this is public figures themselves – by the very nature of their roles they are personally open to criticism
Using neologisms like Trumpites or Trumpoids doesn't distance you from the rules.
So... making jokes about Trump's (or any other politican's) views = okay, making fun of a specific group, like a certain politicans supporters, = not okay?
Quote:
While it is acceptable to attack and debate beliefs (political, religious etc) it is not acceptable to make generalised attacks on the adherents of those beliefs. It is acceptable to say that Republicanism, Liberalism, Christianity, Islam are stupid but not acceptable to make generalised attacks saying that Republicans, Liberals, Christians or Muslims are morons. You could say that some of these people are stupid because of (reason) but not make generalised attacks on groups of people. Similarly you could not say "Christians are morons" or "Muslims are terrorists" or "People on welfare are bums". Confine your attacks to the beliefs and politics, not the people holding them. The one exception to this is public figures themselves – by the very nature of their roles they are personally open to criticism
_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1
Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard
Fireblossom wrote:
SaveFerris wrote:
Alls fair in love and war or so the saying goes unless it seems you are a Trump Supporter then you are apparently fair game .
Let me remind all of you of the rules listed in the PPR sub forum
Using neologisms like Trumpites or Trumpoids doesn't distance you from the rules.
Let me remind all of you of the rules listed in the PPR sub forum
Quote:
While it is acceptable to attack and debate beliefs (political, religious etc) it is not acceptable to make generalised attacks on the adherents of those beliefs. It is acceptable to say that Republicanism, Liberalism, Christianity, Islam are stupid but not acceptable to make generalised attacks saying that Republicans, Liberals, Christians or Muslims are morons. You could say that some of these people are stupid because of (reason) but not make generalised attacks on groups of people. Similarly you could not say "Christians are morons" or "Muslims are terrorists" or "People on welfare are bums". Confine your attacks to the beliefs and politics, not the people holding them. The one exception to this is public figures themselves – by the very nature of their roles they are personally open to criticism
Using neologisms like Trumpites or Trumpoids doesn't distance you from the rules.
So... making jokes about Trump's (or any other politican's) views = okay, making fun of a specific group, like a certain politicans supporters, = not okay?
It would not be okay for me to call people here "liberals".
SaveFerris wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
what the heck is an idiom
Idiom
cyberdad wrote:
and neologism??
neologism
cyberdad wrote:
and how did I breach the WP code of conduct?
Quote:
While it is acceptable to attack and debate beliefs (political, religious etc) it is not acceptable to make generalised attacks on the adherents of those beliefs. It is acceptable to say that Republicanism, Liberalism, Christianity, Islam are stupid but not acceptable to make generalised attacks saying that Republicans, Liberals, Christians or Muslims are morons. You could say that some of these people are stupid because of (reason) but not make generalised attacks on groups of people. Similarly you could not say "Christians are morons" or "Muslims are terrorists" or "People on welfare are bums". Confine your attacks to the beliefs and politics, not the people holding them. The one exception to this is public figures themselves – by the very nature of their roles they are personally open to criticism
So much for spellcheck
cyberdad wrote:
my appalling spelling...I'm surprised the grammar Nazis haven't come for me (especially given I haven't been exactly kind to their cousins in the alt-right)
Like Ezra, I do not see the connection. Didn't see how you misspelled anything, nor If you had misspelled anything that I overlooked- how that relates to Ferris's last post. He was "giving you a schooling", but not for anything to do with spelling (nor was any of it caused by a misunderstand CAUSED by a misspelling that I can see). So WTF RU talking about?

