Trump thinks the Moon is part of Mars

Page 4 of 4 [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

SaveFerris
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,762
Location: UK

10 Jun 2019, 6:24 pm

naturalplastic wrote:
SaveFerris wrote:
Alls fair in love and war or so the saying goes unless it seems you are a Trump Supporter then you are apparently fair game .

Let me remind all of you of the rules listed in the PPR sub forum

Quote:
While it is acceptable to attack and debate beliefs (political, religious etc) it is not acceptable to make generalised attacks on the adherents of those beliefs. It is acceptable to say that Republicanism, Liberalism, Christianity, Islam are stupid but not acceptable to make generalised attacks saying that Republicans, Liberals, Christians or Muslims are morons. You could say that some of these people are stupid because of (reason) but not make generalised attacks on groups of people. Similarly you could not say "Christians are morons" or "Muslims are terrorists" or "People on welfare are bums". Confine your attacks to the beliefs and politics, not the people holding them. The one exception to this is public figures themselves – by the very nature of their roles they are personally open to criticism


Using neologisms like Trumpites or Trumpoids doesn't distance you from the rules. 8)


You oughta redo this post to make it more direct and less confusing.

First off: the expression "all is fair in love and war" means "you can do what ever you want in courtship, or in war, because there are (supposedly) no rules in those two realms". The exact opposite of what you seem to think that it means. Ergo if Trump supporters are fair game then they would NOT be an exception to that ( because if "all is fair" then everyone would be fair game regardless of their support of Trump).

Apparently what you MEANT was "despite the old saying...all is NOT fair. There are rules on WP. And one of the rules is you cant attack groups of people. And that includes Trump supporters". Something like that.



You had me second guessing myself and believing I was more autistic than I thought with regards to idioms. The meds I'm on have given me mild aphasia so I had to check.

Merriam Webster gives this definition

"used to describe a situation in which people do not follow the usual rules of behavior and do things that are normally considered unfair"

I believe I used the idiom correctly.


_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1

Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard


SaveFerris
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,762
Location: UK

10 Jun 2019, 6:28 pm

SaveFerris wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
SaveFerris wrote:
Alls fair in love and war or so the saying goes unless it seems you are a Trump Supporter then you are apparently fair game .

Let me remind all of you of the rules listed in the PPR sub forum

Quote:
While it is acceptable to attack and debate beliefs (political, religious etc) it is not acceptable to make generalised attacks on the adherents of those beliefs. It is acceptable to say that Republicanism, Liberalism, Christianity, Islam are stupid but not acceptable to make generalised attacks saying that Republicans, Liberals, Christians or Muslims are morons. You could say that some of these people are stupid because of (reason) but not make generalised attacks on groups of people. Similarly you could not say "Christians are morons" or "Muslims are terrorists" or "People on welfare are bums". Confine your attacks to the beliefs and politics, not the people holding them. The one exception to this is public figures themselves – by the very nature of their roles they are personally open to criticism


Using neologisms like Trumpites or Trumpoids doesn't distance you from the rules. 8)


You oughta redo this post to make it more direct and less confusing.

First off: the expression "all is fair in love and war" means "you can do what ever you want in courtship, or in war, because there are (supposedly) no rules in those two realms". The exact opposite of what you seem to think that it means. Ergo if Trump supporters are fair game then they would NOT be an exception to that ( because if "all is fair" then everyone would be fair game regardless of their support of Trump).

Apparently what you MEANT was "despite the old saying...all is NOT fair. There are rules on WP. And one of the rules is you cant attack groups of people. And that includes Trump supporters". Something like that.



You had me second guessing myself and believing I was more autistic than I thought with regards to idioms. The meds I'm on have given me mild aphasia so I had to check.

Merriam Webster gives this definition

"used to describe a situation in which people do not follow the usual rules of behavior and do things that are normally considered unfair"

I believe I used the idiom correctly.


Bugger! You are right , I got it wrong :oops:

I think by now members should know what I'm getting at due to the last couple of posts

I think I should steer away from idioms where modding is concerned.

Glad this didn't happen in real life - I feel shame now :roll:


_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1

Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard


naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

10 Jun 2019, 6:36 pm

Well.. we Americans elected a guy POTUS who cant even form a sentence. So I guess we can forgive you for occasionally misspeaking. :D



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,260
Location: the island of defective toy santas

10 Jun 2019, 6:38 pm

naturalplastic wrote:
He is the POTUS, and not some speech impaired autistic child after all.

he reminds me of Biff on B2TF who would say "make like a tree and get outta here!" one doesn't have to be a brain doc to discern some mental deterioration on his part, relative to how sharp he useta be just 10 years ago.



SaveFerris
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,762
Location: UK

10 Jun 2019, 6:40 pm

naturalplastic wrote:
Well.. we Americans elected a guy POTUS who cant even form a sentence. So I guess we can forgive you for occasionally misspeaking. :D


Nicely brought back on topic , quick , make lots of posts so my shame gets buried.


_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1

Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,260
Location: the island of defective toy santas

10 Jun 2019, 6:45 pm

i would bet that unless some minder curbs his tweets and restricts what comes out from his mouth in public, there will be more covfefe moments, and they will accelerate.



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

10 Jun 2019, 8:47 pm

auntblabby wrote:
i would bet that unless some minder curbs his tweets and restricts what comes out from his mouth in public, there will be more covfefe moments, and they will accelerate.


Image



Fireblossom
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jan 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,588

11 Jun 2019, 2:44 am

SaveFerris wrote:
Alls fair in love and war or so the saying goes unless it seems you are a Trump Supporter then you are apparently fair game .

Let me remind all of you of the rules listed in the PPR sub forum

Quote:
While it is acceptable to attack and debate beliefs (political, religious etc) it is not acceptable to make generalised attacks on the adherents of those beliefs. It is acceptable to say that Republicanism, Liberalism, Christianity, Islam are stupid but not acceptable to make generalised attacks saying that Republicans, Liberals, Christians or Muslims are morons. You could say that some of these people are stupid because of (reason) but not make generalised attacks on groups of people. Similarly you could not say "Christians are morons" or "Muslims are terrorists" or "People on welfare are bums". Confine your attacks to the beliefs and politics, not the people holding them. The one exception to this is public figures themselves – by the very nature of their roles they are personally open to criticism


Using neologisms like Trumpites or Trumpoids doesn't distance you from the rules. 8)


So... making jokes about Trump's (or any other politican's) views = okay, making fun of a specific group, like a certain politicans supporters, = not okay?



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

11 Jun 2019, 3:05 am

what the heck is an idiom and neologism?? and how did I breach the WP code of conduct?



SaveFerris
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,762
Location: UK

11 Jun 2019, 3:34 am

cyberdad wrote:
what the heck is an idiom


Idiom

cyberdad wrote:
and neologism??


neologism

cyberdad wrote:
and how did I breach the WP code of conduct?


Quote:
While it is acceptable to attack and debate beliefs (political, religious etc) it is not acceptable to make generalised attacks on the adherents of those beliefs. It is acceptable to say that Republicanism, Liberalism, Christianity, Islam are stupid but not acceptable to make generalised attacks saying that Republicans, Liberals, Christians or Muslims are morons. You could say that some of these people are stupid because of (reason) but not make generalised attacks on groups of people. Similarly you could not say "Christians are morons" or "Muslims are terrorists" or "People on welfare are bums". Confine your attacks to the beliefs and politics, not the people holding them. The one exception to this is public figures themselves – by the very nature of their roles they are personally open to criticism


_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1

Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard


SaveFerris
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,762
Location: UK

11 Jun 2019, 3:36 am

Fireblossom wrote:
SaveFerris wrote:
Alls fair in love and war or so the saying goes unless it seems you are a Trump Supporter then you are apparently fair game .

Let me remind all of you of the rules listed in the PPR sub forum

Quote:
While it is acceptable to attack and debate beliefs (political, religious etc) it is not acceptable to make generalised attacks on the adherents of those beliefs. It is acceptable to say that Republicanism, Liberalism, Christianity, Islam are stupid but not acceptable to make generalised attacks saying that Republicans, Liberals, Christians or Muslims are morons. You could say that some of these people are stupid because of (reason) but not make generalised attacks on groups of people. Similarly you could not say "Christians are morons" or "Muslims are terrorists" or "People on welfare are bums". Confine your attacks to the beliefs and politics, not the people holding them. The one exception to this is public figures themselves – by the very nature of their roles they are personally open to criticism


Using neologisms like Trumpites or Trumpoids doesn't distance you from the rules. 8)


So... making jokes about Trump's (or any other politican's) views = okay, making fun of a specific group, like a certain politicans supporters, = not okay?


Quote:
While it is acceptable to attack and debate beliefs (political, religious etc) it is not acceptable to make generalised attacks on the adherents of those beliefs. It is acceptable to say that Republicanism, Liberalism, Christianity, Islam are stupid but not acceptable to make generalised attacks saying that Republicans, Liberals, Christians or Muslims are morons. You could say that some of these people are stupid because of (reason) but not make generalised attacks on groups of people. Similarly you could not say "Christians are morons" or "Muslims are terrorists" or "People on welfare are bums". Confine your attacks to the beliefs and politics, not the people holding them. The one exception to this is public figures themselves – by the very nature of their roles they are personally open to criticism


_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1

Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

11 Jun 2019, 3:46 am

Fireblossom wrote:
SaveFerris wrote:
Alls fair in love and war or so the saying goes unless it seems you are a Trump Supporter then you are apparently fair game .

Let me remind all of you of the rules listed in the PPR sub forum

Quote:
While it is acceptable to attack and debate beliefs (political, religious etc) it is not acceptable to make generalised attacks on the adherents of those beliefs. It is acceptable to say that Republicanism, Liberalism, Christianity, Islam are stupid but not acceptable to make generalised attacks saying that Republicans, Liberals, Christians or Muslims are morons. You could say that some of these people are stupid because of (reason) but not make generalised attacks on groups of people. Similarly you could not say "Christians are morons" or "Muslims are terrorists" or "People on welfare are bums". Confine your attacks to the beliefs and politics, not the people holding them. The one exception to this is public figures themselves – by the very nature of their roles they are personally open to criticism


Using neologisms like Trumpites or Trumpoids doesn't distance you from the rules. 8)


So... making jokes about Trump's (or any other politican's) views = okay, making fun of a specific group, like a certain politicans supporters, = not okay?


It would not be okay for me to call people here "liberals".



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

11 Jun 2019, 4:17 am

SaveFerris wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
what the heck is an idiom


Idiom

cyberdad wrote:
and neologism??


neologism

cyberdad wrote:
and how did I breach the WP code of conduct?


Quote:
While it is acceptable to attack and debate beliefs (political, religious etc) it is not acceptable to make generalised attacks on the adherents of those beliefs. It is acceptable to say that Republicanism, Liberalism, Christianity, Islam are stupid but not acceptable to make generalised attacks saying that Republicans, Liberals, Christians or Muslims are morons. You could say that some of these people are stupid because of (reason) but not make generalised attacks on groups of people. Similarly you could not say "Christians are morons" or "Muslims are terrorists" or "People on welfare are bums". Confine your attacks to the beliefs and politics, not the people holding them. The one exception to this is public figures themselves – by the very nature of their roles they are personally open to criticism


So much for spellcheck



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

11 Jun 2019, 4:35 am

^ :?:



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

11 Jun 2019, 4:53 am

my appalling spelling...I'm surprised the grammar Nazis haven't come for me (especially given I haven't been exactly kind to their cousins in the alt-right)



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

11 Jun 2019, 10:06 am

cyberdad wrote:
my appalling spelling...I'm surprised the grammar Nazis haven't come for me (especially given I haven't been exactly kind to their cousins in the alt-right)


Like Ezra, I do not see the connection. Didn't see how you misspelled anything, nor If you had misspelled anything that I overlooked- how that relates to Ferris's last post. He was "giving you a schooling", but not for anything to do with spelling (nor was any of it caused by a misunderstand CAUSED by a misspelling that I can see). So WTF RU talking about?