"Trump is the most dangerous person we could have as preside

Page 4 of 4 [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

12 Apr 2020, 3:47 am

Brictoria wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
He who is without sin cast the first stone....hardly think Hastie is in any position to be sanctimonious when members of his own party are guilty of the same crimes

You are as partisan as anybody on this forum


And yet immesurably less partisan than some, from what I see posted.


I wasn't aware you can measure objective bias? is it like being a lukewarm christian?



Last edited by cyberdad on 12 Apr 2020, 3:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

12 Apr 2020, 3:50 am

Brictoria wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
He who is without sin cast the first stone....hardly think Hastie is in any position to be sanctimonious when members of his own party are guilty of the same crimes

You are as partisan as anybody on this forum


And yet immesurably less partisan than some, from what I see posted.


Wow.
A friendly "face".
Rare in these-here-parts, partner. :wink:

The funny thing is,
No matter how many times I agree with their point of view, hard core progressives don't see it.
It is called: "Confirmation Bias".
They only see what they want to see.

The great thing about being a non-partisan moderate conservative, is that you can basically piss off people on both sides of the politcal divide. :mrgreen:

Quote:

In psychology and cognitive science, confirmation bias (or confirmatory bias) is a tendency to search for or interpret information in a way that confirms one's preconceptions, leading to statistical errors.

Confirmation bias is a type of cognitive bias and represents an error of inductive inference toward confirmation of the hypothesis under study.

Confirmation bias is a phenomenon wherein decision makers have been shown to actively seek out and assign more weight to evidence that confirms their hypothesis, and ignore or underweigh evidence that could disconfirm their hypothesis.

As such, it can be thought of as a form of selection bias in collecting evidence.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/terms/conf ... n_bias.htm



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

12 Apr 2020, 3:52 am

I didn't know you could see Brictoria's face?