Kraichgauer wrote:
Mr Reynholm wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Mr Reynholm wrote:
Hillary Clinton still hasn't accepted the 2016 election results even after the whole Russian collusion hoax was exposed.
She did accept the conclusion of the 2016 election, as she conceded.
Russian collusion was never disproven. Rather, Trump had been bailed out by a submissive, Republican dominated senate that refused to take the evidence into account.
The Mueller report found no Russian collusion.
Trump and his supporters say there was no collusion. What Mueller did was present the facts for prosecutors to use, which was done during the impeachment.
Would this have been the collusion Mueller was looking into:
Quote:
‘We have not seen evidence of any individuals affiliated with the Trump team in contact with [Russian intelligence officers].”
How much wasted time on pointless investigations could have been prevented had Peter Strzok, then one of the FBI’s top counterintelligence officials who was spearheading the bureau’s Trump-Russia investigation, said this publicly one month into President Trump’s term?
But no, it was a private note by Strzok, for consumption within the FBI, to debunk a Feb. 14, 2017, New York Times article. The news story, a compilation by five of the Times’ top reporters, working four unnamed sources (the usual “current and former American officials”), claimed that members of the Trump campaign had “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials”
Source:
https://nypost.com/2020/07/20/fbi-knew-collusion-was-a-nothing-burger-but-kept-fake-scandal-alive-anyway/
21 Jul 2020, 9:11 pm
