16yo Thunberg: She’s the MVP Aspie of the world! IMO
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,228
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Only after you started lumping people together as though they were a team, come on, at least pretend to be honest when you complain.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
Oh, it's vague. You're leaving it up to your readers' imaginations.
Point to a violation of the rules or you've got nothing but innuendo.
_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin
Only after you started lumping people together as though they were a team, come on, at least pretend to be honest when you complain.
By not listing names I didn't lump anyone together, they lumped themselves together.
I feel that I have proved what I have said quite satisfactorily and really have nothing more to say about it at this time.
However if I keep being prompted to talk about it, then I will.
"Don't keep rubbing the genie's lamp of you don't want to hear what he has to say."
Oh, it's vague. You're leaving it up to your readers' imaginations.
Point to a violation of the rules or you've got nothing but innuendo.
I already did. Quite clearly.
Oh, it's vague. You're leaving it up to your readers' imaginations.
Point to a violation of the rules or you've got nothing but innuendo.
I already did. Quite clearly.
Oh, you mean what you said in the last page or 2? People supporting each other when they have similar goals and motivations is not spam, and the moderation quite clearly agrees with me. Next.
_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin
goldfish21
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
I suppose another motivation you may have to throw out these vague accusations is that you thrive on the attention it gets you.
Maybe you should try more pleasant interactions with others. Positive attention may be more difficult to attain, but IMO it’s far superior to the negative attention you’re getting by being rude to others.
_________________
No
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,228
Location: Right over your left shoulder
It's not that we don't wish to hear what the genie has to say, it's just that the genie hasn't once added anything of value to the conversation - he just tries to shout down the conversation with nonsensical distractions, insinuations and sad attempts at mischaracterization of the other participants and their motives. Whining that conversations you don't like are spam doesn't make it so; if they were spam you'd have success at getting them locked, since you either haven't succeeded or haven't tried you already understand these threads are legitimate and that your complaints are not.
Since you've been very clear about your intention, jokes on the other posters if they continue to respond to you.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
Oh, it's vague. You're leaving it up to your readers' imaginations.
Point to a violation of the rules or you've got nothing but innuendo.
I already did. Quite clearly.
Oh, you mean what you said in the last page or 2? People supporting each other when they have similar goals and motivations is not spam, and the moderation quite clearly agrees with me. Next.
Actually a moderator made a post that agreed with me.
And like I said, only those who are guilty are the ones who are getting all upset.
It's not that we don't wish to hear what the genie has to say, it's just that the genie hasn't once added anything of value to the conversation - he just tries to shout down the conversation with nonsensical distractions, insinuations and sad attempts at mischaracterization of the other participants and their motives. Whining that conversations you don't like are spam doesn't make it so; if they were spam you'd have success at getting them locked, since you either haven't succeeded or haven't tried you already understand these threads are legitimate and that your complaints are not.
Since you've been very clear about your intention, jokes on the other posters if they continue to respond to you.
Yes they really should stop identifying themselves basically saying "I'm one of the spammers and you pointing it out really pisses me off". Arguing with me that they aren't spammers and so on. Nobody who's not involved in the spamming has had any such reaction.
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,228
Location: Right over your left shoulder
It's not that we don't wish to hear what the genie has to say, it's just that the genie hasn't once added anything of value to the conversation - he just tries to shout down the conversation with nonsensical distractions, insinuations and sad attempts at mischaracterization of the other participants and their motives. Whining that conversations you don't like are spam doesn't make it so; if they were spam you'd have success at getting them locked, since you either haven't succeeded or haven't tried you already understand these threads are legitimate and that your complaints are not.
Since you've been very clear about your intention, jokes on the other posters if they continue to respond to you.
Yes they really should stop identifying themselves basically saying "I'm one of the spammers and you pointing it out really pisses me off". Arguing with me that they aren't spammers and so on. Nobody who's not involved in the spamming has had any such reaction.
You slander people and they're unhappy about it? Perish the notion.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
It's not that we don't wish to hear what the genie has to say, it's just that the genie hasn't once added anything of value to the conversation - he just tries to shout down the conversation with nonsensical distractions, insinuations and sad attempts at mischaracterization of the other participants and their motives. Whining that conversations you don't like are spam doesn't make it so; if they were spam you'd have success at getting them locked, since you either haven't succeeded or haven't tried you already understand these threads are legitimate and that your complaints are not.
Since you've been very clear about your intention, jokes on the other posters if they continue to respond to you.
Yes they really should stop identifying themselves basically saying "I'm one of the spammers and you pointing it out really pisses me off". Arguing with me that they aren't spammers and so on. Nobody who's not involved in the spamming has had any such reaction.
You slander people and they're unhappy about it? Perish the notion.
A) it would be libel, not slander. B) I didn't name any names. Certain people however chose to basically identify themselves as who I was referring to. Although I haven't confirmed any of those people are the ones I was talking about. As a side note, I also have been "slandered", by name. My real name even.
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,228
Location: Right over your left shoulder
If you defame people, they won't like you and they'll express so. It doesn't matter if your defamation reaches a threshold to hold you legally accountable, they're entitled to hold you personally accountable with social sanctions like no longer being friendly or giving you the benefit of the doubt when others make similar accusations, or telling others of their earlier interactions, etc.
If it makes you feel better, you don't have to like people who've defamed you either and are absolutely entitled to sanction them in the same ways; but you should probably stop hijacking the threads they post in to just complain about how they're just spam threads. The only spam is the spam you contribute to these threads.
Honestly, I'm a little ashamed of myself for insisting to goldfish21 that he shouldn't have called you childish, while I don't agree with his formula (considering even NTs mature at different rates and to different extents), I agree with him that you're acting like a child who wants attention from people who don't buy into his superiority complex.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
goldfish21
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
It’s not my formula. It’s Dr. Tony Atwood’s - ASD subject matter expert. Other than that I tend to agree with you. I’m also not upset by it, as EzraS is not as old as others here and can’t be expected to display the same level of maturity.
_________________
No
That depends.
Is the macaroni gluten-free?
Are you being sarcastic again?
Do you want a piece of me, punk?
Age-ism.
<rub hands in glee>
I'm always up for that,
Erm,
If it is us oldies against the punks, that is.
I want in!
Can I have some of the action?
What does a skunk have to do to get a an honourable mention?
He doesn't come across that way to me. <shrug>
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Hello, WP world! |
30 Jun 2026, 4:12 pm |
| Are there a lot of crazy people in this world? |
11 Jul 2026, 4:07 pm |
