Page 32 of 539 [ 8616 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 ... 539  Next

EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

29 Feb 2020, 10:29 am

Currently working on my own version of:

Image



eikonabridge
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Sep 2014
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 929

29 Feb 2020, 10:52 am

Time for a recap on the most salient contributions.

Sample joke.

Jakki wrote:
.. sorry but could not resist being punny with this: Simple answer? stop drinking Corona beer ? or chinese fish?


No need to worry. Except when they do worry, they call themselves "prudent."
MjrMajorMajor wrote:
It is overhyped. Be more worried about the flu...

EzraS wrote:
If I am going to be afraid of this virus I should be considerably more afraid to get into a car.

EzraS wrote:
You should be a lot more concerned over having to drive in the rain a lot. And seagulls crapping on you. And all the vampires.

Trueno wrote:
You are totally correct, Ezra... you're more at risk every time you get in a car.
...
PS... And I agree about the vampires.

EzraS wrote:
It's the end of the world as we know it... again.


False prophets.

Guy Incognito wrote:
In all seriousness, in a week or two it will be old news. It always is.

Karamazov wrote:
I still think that we live in a relatively safe bubble with regards to major disease outbreaks stands though.

kraftiekortie wrote:
New York, with a huge Chinese population, hasn't had ONE confirmed case of the coronavirus yet.

kraftiekortie wrote:
Still not ONE confirmed case in NYC.
...
Obviously, we should be vigilant----but I believe we might be "turning a corner."

kraftiekortie wrote:
We'll see what happens.
Now you see.
kraftiekortie wrote:
I believe China was trying to evade the coronavirus at the start-----but I also believe they were "caught" pretty early.
You mean pretty late, right?
kraftiekortie wrote:
Unless you’ve come in contact with a person who has been in China recently , it’s extremely unlikely that your cold and flu would be caused by the Wuhan Coronavirus.
Tell that to the community-spread cases in the US, now.
kraftiekortie wrote:
Not one case of this strain has been confirmed in NYC, which has FIVE Chinatowns.
...
I believe a corner has been turned.

Unrepentant.
kraftiekortie wrote:
Not exactly a global pandemic. We took the proper precautions, I believe.

Yeah right.
kraftiekortie wrote:
There still has not been a confirmed case in New York City.

And we have five Chinatowns, and people who have (until recently) traveled to and from China on a regular basis.

Keeping up with your five Chinatowns.
kraftiekortie wrote:
The Dow Jones Industrial Average has lost about 7% over the past three days---most of the loss occurred on February 24th and 25th.

What? What happened to the not-one-single-confirmed-case in the five Chinatowns in NYC?
Fnord wrote:
Following in the footsteps of San Diego County and the city of San Francisco, Orange County (California) officials today declared a local health emergency in response to the coronavirus.
...
There has only been one confirmed case of the virus in Orange County.
:roll:

Sigbold wrote:
Like I said the media is probably making it seem worse then it is. ...

Really? But I'll give credit to this person's self-correction.
Sigbold wrote:
That does indeed look worse.



Please reconcile between you two.
kraftiekortie wrote:
Not exactly a global pandemic. We took the proper precautions, I believe.

Fnord wrote:
A group of us came back from an extended trip to the far east yesterday. There was no screening for Corovirus-19 (i.e., "Corona Virus", "Snake Virus", "Wuhan Virus", et cetera) at Los Angeles International Airport (e.g., "LAX") -- no infrared cameras, no remote temperature sensors, no thermometers of any kind, and no questions regarding where we had been, with whom we had been in contact, and how we were feeling.
...
There is a great disparity between the Media hype of this virus and the actual precautions being taken.



Diehard number one
Fnord wrote:
Yes ... let's wait a while before we encourage people to panic.

Fnord wrote:
How about we just blame some past U.S. president and be done with it?

Fnord wrote:
The cervezavirus gave us all immunity.

Fnord wrote:
Are we all dead yet?



Denying that the virus will have economic impact.
Sigbold wrote:
eikonabridge wrote:
Medically, perhaps coronavirus is not the most horrible disease. Most people that have died, had other conditions. But the impact to the economy and to the society overall is huge. Entire cities have been locked down, sport events cancelled. How are you going to have an economy when people don't have freedom of movement?


Like how they had functioning economies when they locked down entire cities during what where still much worse epidemics.
...
But as I said we are probably still far removed from this becoming a new Great Plague. And the media is most likely just hyping things in order to boost viewership/sells.


Does this guy have idea about the societal cost of the virus so far?
Guy Incognito wrote:
I still have a few of the Swine Flu emergency kits they gave us a few years ago. We got those along with an instruction pack on surviving the Outbreak. We did...but at what cost?


Media conspiracy again.
Guy Incognito wrote:
Wait it out. It's not something anyone would want to catch, but the media has a bad habit of turning everything into an Extinction Event. I place more faith in modern medicine than I do the media.


When describing others, these people use the word "panic", "hysteria". When describring themselves, these people use the words "caution", "prudence", "vigilant".
kraftiekortie wrote:
I don't find that there is reason to panic with this outbreak.

Fnord wrote:
So some anonymous gray-haired white guy is telling me it's time to panic ... big, fat, hairy deal.

Fnord wrote:
Nope ... sorry ... not panicked yet ... keep trying ...

Fnord wrote:
Sure, and I am not trying to diminish the threat, I'm just trying to point out that there is no need for panic -- caution, yes, but not panic.

B19 wrote:
While prudence is sensible, the hysteria seems to be extreme at the moment.

EzraS wrote:
There is a difference between prudence and panic.

EzraS wrote:
I am sure most people are at least a little on edge about it.

kraftiekortie wrote:
People are being vigilant about the Coronavirus.

kraftiekortie wrote:
Actually, in my opinion, I didn’t see the mockery. Mostly, I saw an appeal for calm. Hysteria tends to get us nowhere.



Talking about personally dying from the virus.
Aspiegaming wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Aspiegaming wrote:
Ride, Horsemen of Pestilence, ride your white horse!


Which is hilarious until you or somebody you know gets sick

I've been prepared for loss of loved ones. There's no stopping it. I've lost my faith in humanity years ago. The corrupt have too much power, money, and say. I don't care what happens. For many of us who die, I hope those who are corrupt go down with us.


EzraS wrote:
I have had a lifelong respiratory issue that has nearly claimed my life a few times to the point where I had to be resuscitated once. So there is probably a good chance this virus would kill me.

Which might be the reason why I have the attitude I do which got elk on a bridge jumping down my throat.

I think my attitude has been to my advantage in the face of adversity though.

EzraS wrote:
Pneumonia is a big risk to me.

The why I look at it, it is like defensive driving. If someone is a driver with common sense, they will wear a seat belt, keep their hands at 10 & 2 on the steering wheel and keep scanning the road and traffic as they are driving. That does not mean that they are worried they are going to die every day they drive back and forth to work. It just means they are being sensible. Of course one does need a certain amount of healthy fear while driving and not become careless.

EzraS wrote:
If you are frighted I am sorry. But do not take it out on others please.

What? You are the one talking about dying. But hold on, you are not the only Dr.-Jekyll-Mr.-Hyde, wait until you read about the section about hand sanitizer below. This is so funny. You talk about how other people panic, and you are the one talking about dying.
firemonkey wrote:
I'm 63. I'll no doubt catch the virus , and die soon.







Hand Sanitizers
Fnord wrote:
Just wash your hands, stay out of crowded places, and don't touch your face. You'll be fine.
So, sanitizer or no sanitizer?
Fnord wrote:
You have all been duped by the Media into believing that the Wuhan virus is more deadly than any other virus. It isn't. So go ahead and wear your masks, use your hand-sanitizers, and "elbow-bump" people instead of shaking their hands. You will look no more silly than any hypochondriac out there.

So using hand-sanitizer means hypochondriac.
EzraS wrote:
I have a small bottle of hand sanitizer with me whenever I am out and use it frequently this time of year.

Ezra must be a hypochondriac, then.
Fnord wrote:
Condensed version of a blog I read somewhere:

Prevention

These are things we can do to reduce our risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (there is no cure in sight).
...
• Wash your hands for 20 seconds & more frequently than you do now Soap and water and then dry, or an alcohol-based hand rub, and air dry
...
Below we list things we'll need to have in case of a more major interruption to supply; a stock that will last 2 weeks.
...
Alcohol-containing hand rub
...


Wait, are you recommending hand sanitizer, now? And surprise! I found this one thread:

https://wrongplanet.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=374431&p=8192842&hilit=+sanitizer#p8192842
Fnord wrote:
I keep some hand-sanitizer at my desk and I use it whenever someone complains of having caught any kind of "bug".

What? You keep a hand-sanitizer and use it? Hypochondriac! Hypocrite!

To panic or not to panic?
Joe90 wrote:
eikonabridge wrote:
Joe90 wrote:
isn't it natural to panic?

I haven't seen one single person panicking in this forum. I have seen a lot of prudence, and then some mockeries.


Yes you have: me.

Joe90 wrote:
I do think the world is making such a big thing out of this. Yes it can be dangerous to the elderly or those with illnesses but so can about 500 other viruses and diseases that people die of every day. You can never be too careful.

You don't sound like you are panicking. You sound prudent.



Why not joke?
EzraS wrote:
People can make jokes and also view something as serious.

There is a time for everything. This one had a bad timing. https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2017/08/scaramucci-stephen-colbert/536901/

Finally, some wisdom.
Magna wrote:
The Coronavirus does not appear to be 'no big deal' or something not to be gravely concerned about.

That's a rational way of looking at thing, just like most participants in this thread. Yet, how come there are so many comments about media hype, so many people jumping out to say "no need to panic," when there are no people panicking? My best take is that Dr.-Jekyll-and-Mr.-Hyde is at play. Who exactly are panicking? Makes you wonder ...


_________________
Jason Lu
http://www.eikonabridge.com/


IsabellaLinton
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 72,433
Location: Chez Quis

29 Feb 2020, 10:54 am

Question:

Would it be prudent for someone immunocompromised to fly to Los Angeles in April for a week, or should the trip be postponed?

Opinions?


_________________
I never give you my number, I only give you my situation.
Beatles


Sigbold
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jan 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,933
Location: Netherlands

29 Feb 2020, 11:14 am



ouinon2
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jul 2016
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 127

29 Feb 2020, 3:38 pm

ouinon2 wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
... a friend who is a microbiologist .... [ suggests ] that the [ lab ] were experimenting with a naturally occuring coronavirus from the Pangolin and injecting it in bats in a lab and one of the bats escaped and ended up in a wet market. Either way In all likelihood it was accidentally released. .... it's also possible it's an "evolved" coronavirus that's jumped from its animal host to a human ... The genetic history behind the current COVID-19 remains a mystery.
I definitely don't believe that it is/was a bioweapon/deliberately bioengineered for military use, but having done some more reading I'm also beginning to wonder if it really came from the market/the wild.

Apparently there is no significant local population of bats ( the animal that the virus genome indicates as most likely origin ), in Wuhan, for instance, contrary to what I had thought and the impression that is usually given/tends to be reported.

But apparently research on the coronavirus relies on travelling to rural areas with large local bat populations, because they tend to provide sizeable reservoirs of viruses to study, and bringing samples and animals back with them.

.... is it possible that the research lab in Wuhan, alone in the whole of China in having the premises and the license to carry out experiments on higher level/most dangerous or infectious diseases, and using relatively rare and/or wild animals for testing purposes, may have accidentally released this virus, via human error ( natural/inevitable ) or human cupidity ( eg the selling of dead laboratory animals/body parts for the large sums of money that certain rare parts fetch in China )?

*But* a named member of staff/worker at the Wuhan lab has sworn on their life that the lab is not responsible for the virus entering the general population. And the Chinese government has always stated that it came from the wet market.

On the other hand apparently the Chinese government recently, since the outbreak began, issued new directions and regulations to high level disease research labs, ( unnamed but there is only one in China which handles very dangerous ones, Wuhan ), to upgrade and tighten lab security protocols etc.

In the film Jurassic Park the owner and higher level officers could have sworn on their life that the escaped dinosaurs were not their responsibility, but it only took one dishonest disgruntled employee hoping to make money on the side to completely compromise the security systems.

https://www.thestreet.com/latest-news/w ... b-accident So, I am currently less certain that this virus came *directly* from "the wild".

Perhaps it was given a lift, an unnaturally rapid/almost instant transfer from relatively distant isolated rural/forest areas with low density populations to the inner city, via lab testing conditions/situations which, like the camp-hospitals during the Spanish flu in the last half of World War 1, may have inadvertently selected for the most active/adapted to survival in cities.

If this turned out to be true, that perfectly ordinary human error or cupidity caused the outbreak, then in theory, as you and ... commented above, the Chinese government might be held responsible for a a very big bill for costs worldwide arising from the outbreak, and would explain why it made such extraordinarily gigantic efforts to contain it.

But as far as I can see it wouldn't make any difference to how world governments approach it. Only perhaps aggravate the already horribly widespread racial hostility being shown to Asian people. :?
[/quote]
Been doing some more reading.

Apparently 13 of the very first 41 infected patients had absolutely no connection to the "wet"/fish market, nor to anyone else connected to it. The very first patient, who presented with symptoms on 1 December 2019, was an old man with Alzheimers who virtually never left his home.

No one knows how he, or 12 others, caught the virus.

According to this article it appears that the virus had very probably already been circulating in Wuhan and the surrounding area, and even already abroad from as early as the beginning of October. But they still do not know who the true patient-zero was, nor where the virus came from.

https://sciencespeaksblog.org/2020/01/2 ... ypothesis/

It is an extraordinary coincidence that a new coronavirus pops up right next to the only laboratory in the whole of China which is licensed to experiment with level 4 infectious diseases eg coronaviruses, ( and apparently coronaviruses had escaped the previous lab three times before this, but been caught more quickly ), but it may be an accident. :?



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

29 Feb 2020, 5:27 pm

ouinon2 wrote:
According to this article it appears that the virus had very probably already been circulating in Wuhan and the surrounding area, and even already abroad from as early as the beginning of October. But they still do not know who the true patient-zero was, nor where the virus came from.

https://sciencespeaksblog.org/2020/01/2 ... ypothesis/

It is an extraordinary coincidence that a new coronavirus pops up right next to the only laboratory in the whole of China which is licensed to experiment with level 4 infectious diseases eg coronaviruses, ( and apparently coronaviruses had escaped the previous lab three times before this, but been caught more quickly ), but it may be an accident. :?


A more pertinent question is what the CHinese government are licensing to experiment on. The secrecy and lack of transparency has impact on global proportions. We know what happened when Iraq was accused of bioweapons...the enitre country was bombed



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

29 Feb 2020, 5:29 pm

jimmy m wrote:
Another strange headline in the news was:

Over China, coronavirus coincides with plummet in nitrogen dioxide

Image

And they had satellite photos to prove it.

My mind went into cause/effect mode. Then it became obvious. Nitrogen dioxide is a major component of smog. If people don't drive and stay sheltered in their home, they will produce very little smog.

But nowhere in the article do they use the word "smog".


A minor benefit is slowing down climate change



beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

29 Feb 2020, 5:59 pm

eikonabridge,

Great recap. :D


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

29 Feb 2020, 6:12 pm

I would say prudence should be practiced with immunodeficient people when it comes to potential exposure to Covid-19.

I believe Eikonabridge has genuine concerns—but I also feels he wants to mock others and belittle people. And to place himself on a higher plane than others here. That’s not the way to go.

Cherry-picking is a waste of my time. I could be doing better things with my time.



Last edited by kraftiekortie on 29 Feb 2020, 6:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

firemonkey
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,850
Location: Calne,England

29 Feb 2020, 6:38 pm

eikonabridge wrote:
Time for a recap on the most salient contributions.

Sample joke.
Jakki wrote:
.. sorry but could not resist being punny with this: Simple answer? stop drinking Corona beer ? or chinese fish?


No need to worry. Except when they do worry, they call themselves "prudent."
MjrMajorMajor wrote:
It is overhyped. Be more worried about the flu...

EzraS wrote:
If I am going to be afraid of this virus I should be considerably more afraid to get into a car.

EzraS wrote:
You should be a lot more concerned over having to drive in the rain a lot. And seagulls crapping on you. And all the vampires.

Trueno wrote:
You are totally correct, Ezra... you're more at risk every time you get in a car.
...
PS... And I agree about the vampires.

EzraS wrote:
It's the end of the world as we know it... again.


False prophets.

Guy Incognito wrote:
In all seriousness, in a week or two it will be old news. It always is.

Karamazov wrote:
I still think that we live in a relatively safe bubble with regards to major disease outbreaks stands though.

kraftiekortie wrote:
New York, with a huge Chinese population, hasn't had ONE confirmed case of the coronavirus yet.

kraftiekortie wrote:
Still not ONE confirmed case in NYC.
...
Obviously, we should be vigilant----but I believe we might be "turning a corner."

kraftiekortie wrote:
We'll see what happens.
Now you see.
kraftiekortie wrote:
I believe China was trying to evade the coronavirus at the start-----but I also believe they were "caught" pretty early.
You mean pretty late, right?
kraftiekortie wrote:
Unless you’ve come in contact with a person who has been in China recently , it’s extremely unlikely that your cold and flu would be caused by the Wuhan Coronavirus.
Tell that to the community-spread cases in the US, now.
kraftiekortie wrote:
Not one case of this strain has been confirmed in NYC, which has FIVE Chinatowns.
...
I believe a corner has been turned.

Unrepentant.
kraftiekortie wrote:
Not exactly a global pandemic. We took the proper precautions, I believe.

Yeah right.
kraftiekortie wrote:
There still has not been a confirmed case in New York City.

And we have five Chinatowns, and people who have (until recently) traveled to and from China on a regular basis.

Keeping up with your five Chinatowns.
kraftiekortie wrote:
The Dow Jones Industrial Average has lost about 7% over the past three days---most of the loss occurred on February 24th and 25th.

What? What happened to the not-one-single-confirmed-case in the five Chinatowns in NYC?
Fnord wrote:
Following in the footsteps of San Diego County and the city of San Francisco, Orange County (California) officials today declared a local health emergency in response to the coronavirus.
...
There has only been one confirmed case of the virus in Orange County.
:roll:

Sigbold wrote:
Like I said the media is probably making it seem worse then it is. ...

Really? But I'll give credit to this person's self-correction.
Sigbold wrote:
That does indeed look worse.



Please reconcile between you two.
kraftiekortie wrote:
Not exactly a global pandemic. We took the proper precautions, I believe.

Fnord wrote:
A group of us came back from an extended trip to the far east yesterday. There was no screening for Corovirus-19 (i.e., "Corona Virus", "Snake Virus", "Wuhan Virus", et cetera) at Los Angeles International Airport (e.g., "LAX") -- no infrared cameras, no remote temperature sensors, no thermometers of any kind, and no questions regarding where we had been, with whom we had been in contact, and how we were feeling.
...
There is a great disparity between the Media hype of this virus and the actual precautions being taken.



Diehard number one
Fnord wrote:
Yes ... let's wait a while before we encourage people to panic.

Fnord wrote:
How about we just blame some past U.S. president and be done with it?

Fnord wrote:
The cervezavirus gave us all immunity.

Fnord wrote:
Are we all dead yet?



Denying that the virus will have economic impact.
Sigbold wrote:
eikonabridge wrote:
Medically, perhaps coronavirus is not the most horrible disease. Most people that have died, had other conditions. But the impact to the economy and to the society overall is huge. Entire cities have been locked down, sport events cancelled. How are you going to have an economy when people don't have freedom of movement?


Like how they had functioning economies when they locked down entire cities during what where still much worse epidemics.
...
But as I said we are probably still far removed from this becoming a new Great Plague. And the media is most likely just hyping things in order to boost viewership/sells.


Does this guy have idea about the societal cost of the virus so far?
Guy Incognito wrote:
I still have a few of the Swine Flu emergency kits they gave us a few years ago. We got those along with an instruction pack on surviving the Outbreak. We did...but at what cost?


Media conspiracy again.
Guy Incognito wrote:
Wait it out. It's not something anyone would want to catch, but the media has a bad habit of turning everything into an Extinction Event. I place more faith in modern medicine than I do the media.


When describing others, these people use the word "panic", "hysteria". When describring themselves, these people use the words "caution", "prudence", "vigilant".
kraftiekortie wrote:
I don't find that there is reason to panic with this outbreak.

Fnord wrote:
So some anonymous gray-haired white guy is telling me it's time to panic ... big, fat, hairy deal.

Fnord wrote:
Nope ... sorry ... not panicked yet ... keep trying ...

Fnord wrote:
Sure, and I am not trying to diminish the threat, I'm just trying to point out that there is no need for panic -- caution, yes, but not panic.

B19 wrote:
While prudence is sensible, the hysteria seems to be extreme at the moment.

EzraS wrote:
There is a difference between prudence and panic.

EzraS wrote:
I am sure most people are at least a little on edge about it.

kraftiekortie wrote:
People are being vigilant about the Coronavirus.

kraftiekortie wrote:
Actually, in my opinion, I didn’t see the mockery. Mostly, I saw an appeal for calm. Hysteria tends to get us nowhere.



Talking about personally dying from the virus.
Aspiegaming wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Aspiegaming wrote:
Ride, Horsemen of Pestilence, ride your white horse!


Which is hilarious until you or somebody you know gets sick

I've been prepared for loss of loved ones. There's no stopping it. I've lost my faith in humanity years ago. The corrupt have too much power, money, and say. I don't care what happens. For many of us who die, I hope those who are corrupt go down with us.


EzraS wrote:
I have had a lifelong respiratory issue that has nearly claimed my life a few times to the point where I had to be resuscitated once. So there is probably a good chance this virus would kill me.

Which might be the reason why I have the attitude I do which got elk on a bridge jumping down my throat.

I think my attitude has been to my advantage in the face of adversity though.

EzraS wrote:
Pneumonia is a big risk to me.

The why I look at it, it is like defensive driving. If someone is a driver with common sense, they will wear a seat belt, keep their hands at 10 & 2 on the steering wheel and keep scanning the road and traffic as they are driving. That does not mean that they are worried they are going to die every day they drive back and forth to work. It just means they are being sensible. Of course one does need a certain amount of healthy fear while driving and not become careless.

EzraS wrote:
If you are frighted I am sorry. But do not take it out on others please.

What? You are the one talking about dying. But hold on, you are not the only Dr.-Jekyll-Mr.-Hyde, wait until you read about the section about hand sanitizer below. This is so funny. You talk about how other people panic, and you are the one talking about dying.
firemonkey wrote:
I'm 63. I'll no doubt catch the virus , and die soon.







Hand Sanitizers
Fnord wrote:
Just wash your hands, stay out of crowded places, and don't touch your face. You'll be fine.
So, sanitizer or no sanitizer?
Fnord wrote:
You have all been duped by the Media into believing that the Wuhan virus is more deadly than any other virus. It isn't. So go ahead and wear your masks, use your hand-sanitizers, and "elbow-bump" people instead of shaking their hands. You will look no more silly than any hypochondriac out there.

So using hand-sanitizer means hypochondriac.
EzraS wrote:
I have a small bottle of hand sanitizer with me whenever I am out and use it frequently this time of year.

Ezra must be a hypochondriac, then.
Fnord wrote:
Condensed version of a blog I read somewhere:

Prevention

These are things we can do to reduce our risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (there is no cure in sight).
...
• Wash your hands for 20 seconds & more frequently than you do now Soap and water and then dry, or an alcohol-based hand rub, and air dry
...
Below we list things we'll need to have in case of a more major interruption to supply; a stock that will last 2 weeks.
...
Alcohol-containing hand rub
...


Wait, are you recommending hand sanitizer, now? And surprise! I found this one thread:

https://wrongplanet.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=374431&p=8192842&hilit=+sanitizer#p8192842
Fnord wrote:
I keep some hand-sanitizer at my desk and I use it whenever someone complains of having caught any kind of "bug".

What? You keep a hand-sanitizer and use it? Hypochondriac! Hypocrite!

To panic or not to panic?
Joe90 wrote:
eikonabridge wrote:
Joe90 wrote:
isn't it natural to panic?

I haven't seen one single person panicking in this forum. I have seen a lot of prudence, and then some mockeries.


Yes you have: me.

Joe90 wrote:
I do think the world is making such a big thing out of this. Yes it can be dangerous to the elderly or those with illnesses but so can about 500 other viruses and diseases that people die of every day. You can never be too careful.

You don't sound like you are panicking. You sound prudent.



Why not joke?
EzraS wrote:
People can make jokes and also view something as serious.

There is a time for everything. This one had a bad timing. https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2017/08/scaramucci-stephen-colbert/536901/

Finally, some wisdom.
Magna wrote:
The Coronavirus does not appear to be 'no big deal' or something not to be gravely concerned about.

That's a rational way of looking at thing, just like most participants in this thread. Yet, how come there are so many comments about media hype, so many people jumping out to say "no need to panic," when there are no people panicking? My best take is that Dr.-Jekyll-and-Mr.-Hyde is at play. Who exactly are panicking? Makes you wonder ...

I
You mention hand sanitisers. How does that help then? I 'm not the bravest and most optimistic of people. I'll readily admit I'm scared .


_________________
Socially drifted middle class


Magna
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jun 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,932

29 Feb 2020, 7:20 pm

The Chinese communist government says that the virus was natural and spontaneous rather than being modified in a lab. I think the most important thing at this point for the sake of the world is for the world to definitely conclude whether this is true or not.

It it's true and if 40%-70% of the 7.7 billion global population contract this and if the mortality rate is 2%, that means 154 million people could die from this. IF China is responsible and negligent, should the rest of the world just shrug its shoulders and say "Oh, well."?

It's a HUGE deal to either determine or rule out the origin of this virus. If it kills millions of people and potentially forever changes humanity (ie reoccurs seasonally), it's everything really to determine if China is at fault.

Also, this is somewhat of a rhetorical question: How do you prevent a pandemic from spreading from one country to another or one continent or another? Or how can you try to minimize the spread of a pandemic from one country or continent to another? Examples?



beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

29 Feb 2020, 7:23 pm

Now, this post will necessarily be a bit speculative, but after watching this video, I believe that the United States, out of all the developed countries, will be hit the hardest:



His most important point is below:

Quote:
Americans are basically more likely to suffer more than anybody in China or even in Europe, because the people are going to be going to work because they can't afford a sick day, people are going to send their kids to school because they can't afford a nanny and they can't take a sick day, people are going to lose their jobs because they're hospitalized for a week or two. Everything the government has refused to fix in the American health system is basically all going to come crashing down at once.


Now, I don't know if his level of doom and gloom is warranted, but he makes a good point about how a lot of working class Americans need to work every shift in order to make next month's rent. When sick days are not guaranteed in the US, people aren't going to stop going to work if they just have mild symptoms--after all, maybe it's just a cold, or the flu, or allergies--and this goes for many people working in the service industry. And when you are looking at the prospect of massive medical bills endangering your credit, you'll be reluctant to see a health care provider. So because of these perverse incentives, people will keep spreading the coronavirus.

This is where I think a lot of the messaging loses touch with many Americans, because if they do as the recommendations suggest and they stay home, miss work, miss next month's rent, and turn out not to have the coronavirus anyway, what guarantee are they going to have that it'll be alright for them? Many will end up homeless. In other developed countries, the government mandates sick days and provides universal health care, and a much better safety net overall.

This is why I think the US will be impacted the most of the developed world.


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

29 Feb 2020, 7:25 pm

We shall see what hot spring days bring....



beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

29 Feb 2020, 7:41 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
We shall see what hot spring days bring....


So will the US health system get lucky and have warm temperatures stop the spread? We actually don't know yet:

https://time.com/5790880/coronavirus-wa ... er-summer/

But I will also predict this, if the onset of warm weather stops this coronavirus in its tracks this year before the US is majorly affected, people will just use it to argue, See? We don't need to guarantee sick days or universal health care. Just look at what happened with that coronavirus hype! Ignore these hoaxes by all those liberals and socialists! And it will take until the next big one to make the point.


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

29 Feb 2020, 8:16 pm

Conservatives will continue to feel the way they feel—Coronavirus or no Coronavirus.



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

29 Feb 2020, 8:21 pm

ouinon2 wrote:
On the other hand apparently the Chinese government recently, since the outbreak began, issued new directions and regulations to high level disease research labs, ( unnamed but there is only one in China which handles very dangerous ones, Wuhan ), to upgrade and tighten lab security protocols etc.
But as far as I can see it wouldn't make any difference to how world governments approach it.


Epidemiological research requires an understanding of ground zero where the virus first arose to properly inform treatment protocols. The Chinese government's reluctance to share information on viral biolab facility just next door to the virus outbreak plus sudden new protocols on security in such labs in Wuhan is highly suspicious.