Emergence of a Deadly Coronavirus
Time for a recap on the most salient contributions.
Sample joke.
No need to worry. Except when they do worry, they call themselves "prudent."
...
PS... And I agree about the vampires.
False prophets.
...
Obviously, we should be vigilant----but I believe we might be "turning a corner."
...
I believe a corner has been turned.
Unrepentant.
Yeah right.
And we have five Chinatowns, and people who have (until recently) traveled to and from China on a regular basis.
Keeping up with your five Chinatowns.
What? What happened to the not-one-single-confirmed-case in the five Chinatowns in NYC?
...
There has only been one confirmed case of the virus in Orange County.
Really? But I'll give credit to this person's self-correction.
Please reconcile between you two.
...
There is a great disparity between the Media hype of this virus and the actual precautions being taken.
Diehard number one
Denying that the virus will have economic impact.
Like how they had functioning economies when they locked down entire cities during what where still much worse epidemics.
...
But as I said we are probably still far removed from this becoming a new Great Plague. And the media is most likely just hyping things in order to boost viewership/sells.
Does this guy have idea about the societal cost of the virus so far?
Media conspiracy again.
When describing others, these people use the word "panic", "hysteria". When describring themselves, these people use the words "caution", "prudence", "vigilant".
Talking about personally dying from the virus.
Which is hilarious until you or somebody you know gets sick
I've been prepared for loss of loved ones. There's no stopping it. I've lost my faith in humanity years ago. The corrupt have too much power, money, and say. I don't care what happens. For many of us who die, I hope those who are corrupt go down with us.
Which might be the reason why I have the attitude I do which got elk on a bridge jumping down my throat.
I think my attitude has been to my advantage in the face of adversity though.
The why I look at it, it is like defensive driving. If someone is a driver with common sense, they will wear a seat belt, keep their hands at 10 & 2 on the steering wheel and keep scanning the road and traffic as they are driving. That does not mean that they are worried they are going to die every day they drive back and forth to work. It just means they are being sensible. Of course one does need a certain amount of healthy fear while driving and not become careless.
What? You are the one talking about dying. But hold on, you are not the only Dr.-Jekyll-Mr.-Hyde, wait until you read about the section about hand sanitizer below. This is so funny. You talk about how other people panic, and you are the one talking about dying.
Hand Sanitizers
So using hand-sanitizer means hypochondriac.
Ezra must be a hypochondriac, then.
Prevention
These are things we can do to reduce our risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (there is no cure in sight).
...
• Wash your hands for 20 seconds & more frequently than you do now Soap and water and then dry, or an alcohol-based hand rub, and air dry
...
Below we list things we'll need to have in case of a more major interruption to supply; a stock that will last 2 weeks.
...
• Alcohol-containing hand rub
...
Wait, are you recommending hand sanitizer, now? And surprise! I found this one thread:
https://wrongplanet.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=374431&p=8192842&hilit=+sanitizer#p8192842
What? You keep a hand-sanitizer and use it? Hypochondriac! Hypocrite!
To panic or not to panic?
I haven't seen one single person panicking in this forum. I have seen a lot of prudence, and then some mockeries.
Yes you have: me.
You don't sound like you are panicking. You sound prudent.
Why not joke?
There is a time for everything. This one had a bad timing. https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2017/08/scaramucci-stephen-colbert/536901/
Finally, some wisdom.
That's a rational way of looking at thing, just like most participants in this thread. Yet, how come there are so many comments about media hype, so many people jumping out to say "no need to panic," when there are no people panicking? My best take is that Dr.-Jekyll-and-Mr.-Hyde is at play. Who exactly are panicking? Makes you wonder ...
Apparently there is no significant local population of bats ( the animal that the virus genome indicates as most likely origin ), in Wuhan, for instance, contrary to what I had thought and the impression that is usually given/tends to be reported.
But apparently research on the coronavirus relies on travelling to rural areas with large local bat populations, because they tend to provide sizeable reservoirs of viruses to study, and bringing samples and animals back with them.
.... is it possible that the research lab in Wuhan, alone in the whole of China in having the premises and the license to carry out experiments on higher level/most dangerous or infectious diseases, and using relatively rare and/or wild animals for testing purposes, may have accidentally released this virus, via human error ( natural/inevitable ) or human cupidity ( eg the selling of dead laboratory animals/body parts for the large sums of money that certain rare parts fetch in China )?
*But* a named member of staff/worker at the Wuhan lab has sworn on their life that the lab is not responsible for the virus entering the general population. And the Chinese government has always stated that it came from the wet market.
On the other hand apparently the Chinese government recently, since the outbreak began, issued new directions and regulations to high level disease research labs, ( unnamed but there is only one in China which handles very dangerous ones, Wuhan ), to upgrade and tighten lab security protocols etc.
In the film Jurassic Park the owner and higher level officers could have sworn on their life that the escaped dinosaurs were not their responsibility, but it only took one dishonest disgruntled employee hoping to make money on the side to completely compromise the security systems.
https://www.thestreet.com/latest-news/w ... b-accident So, I am currently less certain that this virus came *directly* from "the wild".
Perhaps it was given a lift, an unnaturally rapid/almost instant transfer from relatively distant isolated rural/forest areas with low density populations to the inner city, via lab testing conditions/situations which, like the camp-hospitals during the Spanish flu in the last half of World War 1, may have inadvertently selected for the most active/adapted to survival in cities.
If this turned out to be true, that perfectly ordinary human error or cupidity caused the outbreak, then in theory, as you and ... commented above, the Chinese government might be held responsible for a a very big bill for costs worldwide arising from the outbreak, and would explain why it made such extraordinarily gigantic efforts to contain it.
But as far as I can see it wouldn't make any difference to how world governments approach it. Only perhaps aggravate the already horribly widespread racial hostility being shown to Asian people.
Been doing some more reading.
Apparently 13 of the very first 41 infected patients had absolutely no connection to the "wet"/fish market, nor to anyone else connected to it. The very first patient, who presented with symptoms on 1 December 2019, was an old man with Alzheimers who virtually never left his home.
No one knows how he, or 12 others, caught the virus.
According to this article it appears that the virus had very probably already been circulating in Wuhan and the surrounding area, and even already abroad from as early as the beginning of October. But they still do not know who the true patient-zero was, nor where the virus came from.
https://sciencespeaksblog.org/2020/01/2 ... ypothesis/
It is an extraordinary coincidence that a new coronavirus pops up right next to the only laboratory in the whole of China which is licensed to experiment with level 4 infectious diseases eg coronaviruses, ( and apparently coronaviruses had escaped the previous lab three times before this, but been caught more quickly ), but it may be an accident.
https://sciencespeaksblog.org/2020/01/2 ... ypothesis/
It is an extraordinary coincidence that a new coronavirus pops up right next to the only laboratory in the whole of China which is licensed to experiment with level 4 infectious diseases eg coronaviruses, ( and apparently coronaviruses had escaped the previous lab three times before this, but been caught more quickly ), but it may be an accident.
A more pertinent question is what the CHinese government are licensing to experiment on. The secrecy and lack of transparency has impact on global proportions. We know what happened when Iraq was accused of bioweapons...the enitre country was bombed
Over China, coronavirus coincides with plummet in nitrogen dioxide

And they had satellite photos to prove it.
My mind went into cause/effect mode. Then it became obvious. Nitrogen dioxide is a major component of smog. If people don't drive and stay sheltered in their home, they will produce very little smog.
But nowhere in the article do they use the word "smog".
A minor benefit is slowing down climate change
I would say prudence should be practiced with immunodeficient people when it comes to potential exposure to Covid-19.
I believe Eikonabridge has genuine concerns—but I also feels he wants to mock others and belittle people. And to place himself on a higher plane than others here. That’s not the way to go.
Cherry-picking is a waste of my time. I could be doing better things with my time.
Last edited by kraftiekortie on 29 Feb 2020, 6:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sample joke.
No need to worry. Except when they do worry, they call themselves "prudent."
...
PS... And I agree about the vampires.
False prophets.
...
Obviously, we should be vigilant----but I believe we might be "turning a corner."
...
I believe a corner has been turned.
Unrepentant.
Yeah right.
And we have five Chinatowns, and people who have (until recently) traveled to and from China on a regular basis.
Keeping up with your five Chinatowns.
What? What happened to the not-one-single-confirmed-case in the five Chinatowns in NYC?
...
There has only been one confirmed case of the virus in Orange County.
Really? But I'll give credit to this person's self-correction.
Please reconcile between you two.
...
There is a great disparity between the Media hype of this virus and the actual precautions being taken.
Diehard number one
Denying that the virus will have economic impact.
Like how they had functioning economies when they locked down entire cities during what where still much worse epidemics.
...
But as I said we are probably still far removed from this becoming a new Great Plague. And the media is most likely just hyping things in order to boost viewership/sells.
Does this guy have idea about the societal cost of the virus so far?
Media conspiracy again.
When describing others, these people use the word "panic", "hysteria". When describring themselves, these people use the words "caution", "prudence", "vigilant".
Talking about personally dying from the virus.
Which is hilarious until you or somebody you know gets sick
I've been prepared for loss of loved ones. There's no stopping it. I've lost my faith in humanity years ago. The corrupt have too much power, money, and say. I don't care what happens. For many of us who die, I hope those who are corrupt go down with us.
Which might be the reason why I have the attitude I do which got elk on a bridge jumping down my throat.
I think my attitude has been to my advantage in the face of adversity though.
The why I look at it, it is like defensive driving. If someone is a driver with common sense, they will wear a seat belt, keep their hands at 10 & 2 on the steering wheel and keep scanning the road and traffic as they are driving. That does not mean that they are worried they are going to die every day they drive back and forth to work. It just means they are being sensible. Of course one does need a certain amount of healthy fear while driving and not become careless.
What? You are the one talking about dying. But hold on, you are not the only Dr.-Jekyll-Mr.-Hyde, wait until you read about the section about hand sanitizer below. This is so funny. You talk about how other people panic, and you are the one talking about dying.
Hand Sanitizers
So using hand-sanitizer means hypochondriac.
Ezra must be a hypochondriac, then.
Prevention
These are things we can do to reduce our risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (there is no cure in sight).
...
• Wash your hands for 20 seconds & more frequently than you do now Soap and water and then dry, or an alcohol-based hand rub, and air dry
...
Below we list things we'll need to have in case of a more major interruption to supply; a stock that will last 2 weeks.
...
• Alcohol-containing hand rub
...
Wait, are you recommending hand sanitizer, now? And surprise! I found this one thread:
https://wrongplanet.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=374431&p=8192842&hilit=+sanitizer#p8192842
What? You keep a hand-sanitizer and use it? Hypochondriac! Hypocrite!
To panic or not to panic?
I haven't seen one single person panicking in this forum. I have seen a lot of prudence, and then some mockeries.
Yes you have: me.
You don't sound like you are panicking. You sound prudent.
Why not joke?
There is a time for everything. This one had a bad timing. https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2017/08/scaramucci-stephen-colbert/536901/
Finally, some wisdom.
That's a rational way of looking at thing, just like most participants in this thread. Yet, how come there are so many comments about media hype, so many people jumping out to say "no need to panic," when there are no people panicking? My best take is that Dr.-Jekyll-and-Mr.-Hyde is at play. Who exactly are panicking? Makes you wonder ...
I
You mention hand sanitisers. How does that help then? I 'm not the bravest and most optimistic of people. I'll readily admit I'm scared .
_________________
Socially drifted middle class
The Chinese communist government says that the virus was natural and spontaneous rather than being modified in a lab. I think the most important thing at this point for the sake of the world is for the world to definitely conclude whether this is true or not.
It it's true and if 40%-70% of the 7.7 billion global population contract this and if the mortality rate is 2%, that means 154 million people could die from this. IF China is responsible and negligent, should the rest of the world just shrug its shoulders and say "Oh, well."?
It's a HUGE deal to either determine or rule out the origin of this virus. If it kills millions of people and potentially forever changes humanity (ie reoccurs seasonally), it's everything really to determine if China is at fault.
Also, this is somewhat of a rhetorical question: How do you prevent a pandemic from spreading from one country to another or one continent or another? Or how can you try to minimize the spread of a pandemic from one country or continent to another? Examples?
Now, this post will necessarily be a bit speculative, but after watching this video, I believe that the United States, out of all the developed countries, will be hit the hardest:
His most important point is below:
Now, I don't know if his level of doom and gloom is warranted, but he makes a good point about how a lot of working class Americans need to work every shift in order to make next month's rent. When sick days are not guaranteed in the US, people aren't going to stop going to work if they just have mild symptoms--after all, maybe it's just a cold, or the flu, or allergies--and this goes for many people working in the service industry. And when you are looking at the prospect of massive medical bills endangering your credit, you'll be reluctant to see a health care provider. So because of these perverse incentives, people will keep spreading the coronavirus.
This is where I think a lot of the messaging loses touch with many Americans, because if they do as the recommendations suggest and they stay home, miss work, miss next month's rent, and turn out not to have the coronavirus anyway, what guarantee are they going to have that it'll be alright for them? Many will end up homeless. In other developed countries, the government mandates sick days and provides universal health care, and a much better safety net overall.
This is why I think the US will be impacted the most of the developed world.
_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin
So will the US health system get lucky and have warm temperatures stop the spread? We actually don't know yet:
https://time.com/5790880/coronavirus-wa ... er-summer/
But I will also predict this, if the onset of warm weather stops this coronavirus in its tracks this year before the US is majorly affected, people will just use it to argue, See? We don't need to guarantee sick days or universal health care. Just look at what happened with that coronavirus hype! Ignore these hoaxes by all those liberals and socialists! And it will take until the next big one to make the point.
_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin
But as far as I can see it wouldn't make any difference to how world governments approach it.
Epidemiological research requires an understanding of ground zero where the virus first arose to properly inform treatment protocols. The Chinese government's reluctance to share information on viral biolab facility just next door to the virus outbreak plus sudden new protocols on security in such labs in Wuhan is highly suspicious.

