Woman calls cops another Black Jogger
If she keeps her mouth shut, she’ll probably get an ACD with community service.
The CW (civilian witness) has refused to cooperate.
It’s possible that the case will be dismissed.
His threat was unspecified, "I am going to do something you won't like".
Seriously, if that is perceived as a threat, that person's got bigger problems.
How do you know she doesn't have an anxiety disorder?
It could be that his build is much larger than hers, so it added to the "intimidation" she felt...And we don't know the tone used in making the statement (words on a screen can appear very different to people than those same words do when spoken).
It's easy to judge a person as "guilty" without full knowledge of what happened, much harder to treat them as "innocent until proven guilty".
Are you saying the court should mandate psych treatment and evaluation instead of community service or jail time since her "panic attack" was what led to her threatening to have the guy falsely arrested?
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,210
Location: Right over your left shoulder
That place wasn't for me, either.
What is AF?
AutismForums dot com
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
"A person is guilty of falsely reporting an incident in the third degree when, knowing the information reported, conveyed or circulated to be false or baseless, he or she"
https://codes.findlaw.com/ny/penal-law/ ... 40-50.html
1. Is the man African -American? Yes.
2. Was he in the park? Yes.
3. Did he make a threat directed at her and her dog? Yes.
She conveyed truthful information, no crime.
She even was nice enough to warn him, and give him a chance to back down.
It even turned out the guy made good on his threat, by engaging in criminal behavior of luring her dog from her.
_________________
Then a hero comes along, with the strength to carry on, and you cast your fears aside, and you know you can survive.
Be the hero of your life.
Last edited by TheRobotLives on 09 Jul 2020, 3:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,210
Location: Right over your left shoulder
https://codes.findlaw.com/ny/penal-law/ ... 40-50.html
1. Is the man African -American? Yes.
2. Was he in the park? Yes.
3. Did he make a threat directed at her and her dog? Yes.
So, no crime.
It even turns out the guy made good on this threat, by engaging in criminal behavior of luring her dog from her.
Don't be too surprised if your interpretation doesn't match the courts ruling.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
If she keeps her mouth shut, she’ll probably get an ACD with community service.
The CW (civilian witness) has refused to cooperate.
It’s possible that the case will be dismissed.
His threat was unspecified, "I am going to do something you won't like".
Seriously, if that is perceived as a threat, that person's got bigger problems.
How do you know she doesn't have an anxiety disorder?
It could be that his build is much larger than hers, so it added to the "intimidation" she felt...And we don't know the tone used in making the statement (words on a screen can appear very different to people than those same words do when spoken).
It's easy to judge a person as "guilty" without full knowledge of what happened, much harder to treat them as "innocent until proven guilty".
I have anxiety disorder and it wouldn't occur to me to call the cops on a black person.
And anxiety disorder counts as a bigger problem.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.
He likely committed a crime in luring her dog away.
Not sure on that...While it is a felony to do so, if it is being done to enforce a law I believe there is an exeption where it "is incidental to the enforcement of some law or regulation" (and so would depend on whether he was authorised to enforce the "dogs off leashes" law/regulation).
Well, since he is not working for law enforcement, he is not authorized to "enforce the law".
Because he prepared the bones ahead of time, so clearly it wasn't a "knee jerk" reaction.
By the way, I was bitten by a dog when I was 6, and I am very much triggered by the dogs off leashes. I try to change routs each time I see a dog but if I already happened to be too close to the dog, I might get into the panic mode and start screaming for them to take the dog on leash. However, I wouldn't be taping it on camera since my only concern would be the immediate safety. His behavior seems a lot more calculated than mine, so it is hard to believe that he was triggered.
If she keeps her mouth shut, she’ll probably get an ACD with community service.
The CW (civilian witness) has refused to cooperate.
It’s possible that the case will be dismissed.
His threat was unspecified, "I am going to do something you won't like".
Seriously, if that is perceived as a threat, that person's got bigger problems.
How do you define "threat"?
The way I define it is "if you do X, I will do Y". In this case X is failing to leash the dog and Y is "doing something you wouldn't like". So, by this definition, it is a threat.
If you disagree, how would you define the word "threat" then?
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,210
Location: Right over your left shoulder
If she keeps her mouth shut, she’ll probably get an ACD with community service.
The CW (civilian witness) has refused to cooperate.
It’s possible that the case will be dismissed.
His threat was unspecified, "I am going to do something you won't like".
Seriously, if that is perceived as a threat, that person's got bigger problems.
How do you define "threat"?
The way I define it is "if you do X, I will do Y". In this case X is failing to leash the dog and Y is "doing something you wouldn't like". So, by this definition, it is a threat.
If you disagree, how would you define the word "threat" then?
Even if it might fit a dictionary definition it would be stretching the legal definition and that's why she's facing charges for making a false report and he hasn't faced any charges. He did nothing wrong in the eyes of the law and she did.
She tried to use the police as a weapon and it turns out they're not interested in being her armed thugs and are holding her to account for her actions as they damn well should.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
Last edited by funeralxempire on 10 Jul 2020, 3:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If she keeps her mouth shut, she’ll probably get an ACD with community service.
The CW (civilian witness) has refused to cooperate.
It’s possible that the case will be dismissed.
His threat was unspecified, "I am going to do something you won't like".
Seriously, if that is perceived as a threat, that person's got bigger problems.
How do you define "threat"?
The way I define it is "if you do X, I will do Y". In this case X is failing to leash the dog and Y is "doing something you wouldn't like". So, by this definition, it is a threat.
If you disagree, how would you define the word "threat" then?
Even if it might fit a dictionary definition it would be stretching the legal definition and that's why she's facing charges and he hasn't.
Whats the legal definition then?
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,210
Location: Right over your left shoulder
If she keeps her mouth shut, she’ll probably get an ACD with community service.
The CW (civilian witness) has refused to cooperate.
It’s possible that the case will be dismissed.
His threat was unspecified, "I am going to do something you won't like".
Seriously, if that is perceived as a threat, that person's got bigger problems.
How do you define "threat"?
The way I define it is "if you do X, I will do Y". In this case X is failing to leash the dog and Y is "doing something you wouldn't like". So, by this definition, it is a threat.
If you disagree, how would you define the word "threat" then?
Even if it might fit a dictionary definition it would be stretching the legal definition and that's why she's facing charges and he hasn't.
Whats the legal definition then?
I'm too lazy to dig up the exact wording under New York law when it's obvious by the fact that no charges were applied that this didn't meet it.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
If she keeps her mouth shut, she’ll probably get an ACD with community service.
The CW (civilian witness) has refused to cooperate.
It’s possible that the case will be dismissed.
His threat was unspecified, "I am going to do something you won't like".
Seriously, if that is perceived as a threat, that person's got bigger problems.
How do you define "threat"?
The way I define it is "if you do X, I will do Y". In this case X is failing to leash the dog and Y is "doing something you wouldn't like". So, by this definition, it is a threat.
If you disagree, how would you define the word "threat" then?
Even if it might fit a dictionary definition it would be stretching the legal definition and that's why she's facing charges and he hasn't.
Whats the legal definition then?
I'm too lazy to dig up the exact wording under New York law when it's obvious by the fact that no charges were applied that this didn't meet it.
If you are too lazy to dig it out, how was she supposed to dig it out right on the spot when she felt scared?
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,210
Location: Right over your left shoulder
If she keeps her mouth shut, she’ll probably get an ACD with community service.
The CW (civilian witness) has refused to cooperate.
It’s possible that the case will be dismissed.
His threat was unspecified, "I am going to do something you won't like".
Seriously, if that is perceived as a threat, that person's got bigger problems.
How do you define "threat"?
The way I define it is "if you do X, I will do Y". In this case X is failing to leash the dog and Y is "doing something you wouldn't like". So, by this definition, it is a threat.
If you disagree, how would you define the word "threat" then?
Even if it might fit a dictionary definition it would be stretching the legal definition and that's why she's facing charges and he hasn't.
Whats the legal definition then?
I'm too lazy to dig up the exact wording under New York law when it's obvious by the fact that no charges were applied that this didn't meet it.
If you are too lazy to dig it out, how was she supposed to dig it out right on the spot when she felt scared?
She can use her own better judgment instead of choosing to maliciously use the police as a weapon. She told him she was going to lie about what he had done and proceeded to call exaggerating what had occurred. That's why she's not even receiving sympathy from the police.
If you think she's in the right instead of arguing with me offer her your help and post the news story when she's acquitted or the case is dismissed. (mind you, if she's acquitted because her victim doesn't cooperate that would not prove your point)
If you're just sympathetic to her but don't actually have a case to make, accept that her attempt to take advantage of institutional biases in policing was so egregious that even the cops are offended.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
