[IMPORTANT] Hamas launches foot assault against settlements.

Page 36 of 180 [ 2875 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 ... 180  Next

Mona Pereth
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Sep 2018
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,717
Location: New York City (Queens)

20 Oct 2023, 7:09 pm

Persephone29 wrote:
Most of the reason I just post my two cents and don't argue back on this particular issue is because the same people who drone on and on about Palestinian Genocide, don't batt an eye at the fact that Israel/Israelis had to wait nearly 20 years to be acknowledged as human beings. It's easier to slaughter people when you don't even believe they have a right to exist.

No one in this situation, except for extremists like Hamas, has been advocating the slaughter of Jews.

Persephone29 wrote:
Yet, if you do DNA testing for the entire Middle East, the Jews are a Middle Eastern people. Where did they spring up from? From under a rock, with no ties to the land they are on? No, beginning in 1947 they were placed by the UN, in the location that to this day is still offering up archeological artifacts that support this was their homeland before the diaspora. Up to that point the land was occupied by the Palestinians, not the other way around. Ancient Israel was occupied by Palestinians, when the Jews returned to the land of their ancestors, aided by the UN (so another HOLOCAUST could not happen again!), the Palestinians were routed out.

It is likely that it least some, probably many, of the Palestinians are themselves of Jewish descent, via the original Jewish followers of Jesus.

In any case, DNA tests have shown that nearly everyone in Israel, Palestine, and Lebanon, including both Jews and "Arabs," are descended from the ancient Canaanites. So, yes, the Palestinians are indigenous. They are not "occupiers."

Persephone29 wrote:
What did that land look like, back then? It was the desert equivalent of a slum...

At least some parts of what is now Israel/Palestine were like that, yes. Not necessarily the entire region.

Persephone29 wrote:
With hard work and the ingenious Jewish mind, it became the prosperous land it was in days gone by, because it had a secret (not so secret) ingredient: God.

The earliest Zionist Jews were not religious. So they didn't have "God." But at least some of them did have sufficient know-how to build successful irrigation projects, and did have enough money to buy the land to build them on. And, yes, those irrigation projects were a valuable contribution.

Persephone29 wrote:
What land do you live on? Is it a land that was owned by your ancestors from 2,000-3,000years ago? If so, you're very fortunate and honorable. I can't say the same. I live on a land I'm not entitled to, it belongs to the Timucuan and Seminole Native American tribes. The UN didn't exist when the settlers came in and destroyed the people and their fascinating and unique cultures. Then, kept encroaching, relegating them to tiny plots of land and alcoholism. There was a study done, it shows that these people lack an enzyme to break down alcohol. They never needed "spirits," they felt that feeling naturally through their spiritual practices. And we took that from them and gave them a deadly substitute. We committed genocide. And I am sick to death of the fake a**, holier than thou, people who share this country with me. The ones who are home owners, on stolen land. The ones who shop in stores on top of ancient burial mounds and take vacations to see the wonders of this land where tribes used to live. They're full of sh**!

If you feel that strongly about genocide, I challenge you to pack your sh** and leave your home, right now. Because until you do, I call B.S. Charity begins at home and you're already complicit by just staying put. Until you do that, and post pics, or it didn't happen, you're just virtue signaling.

It's not realistic to expect almost the entire population of North America to leave. But at least we can and should insist that the U.S. government honor the treaties it made with the indigenous tribes. We can also make sure we don't further rob the tribes of resources or desecrate their holy places; and we can ensure that they have all the rights of U.S. citizens in addition to their tribal rights. We can and should oppose all attempts by anyone (e.g. oil companies seeking to lay pipelines near a reservation) to do things that would worsen the situation of indigenous Americans.

Persephone29 wrote:
On Oct 7th, 2023 these Jewish individuals were bothering NO ONE. Simply existing is not inciting or asking to be slaughtered. Simply living life is NOT asking for it...

Of course the Hamas attack should be condemned. As far as I am aware, no one here has endorsed the Hamas attack.


_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.


Persephone29
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jun 2019
Age: 57
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,405
Location: Everville

20 Oct 2023, 7:41 pm

Recidivist wrote:
TwilightPrincess wrote:

The UN published this yesterday:

Quote:
The experts raised serious humanitarian and legal concerns over Israel tightening its 16-year siege of the enclave and its population and long-standing occupation, depriving 2.2 million people of essential food, fuel, water, electricity and medicine. An estimated 50,000 pregnant women in Gaza, are in desperate need of prenatal and postnatal care. The number of internally displaced people across the Gaza Strip is estimated at around one million.

They recalled that the UN Security Council has repeatedly condemned the use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare, which is prohibited under international humanitarian and criminal law. The unlawful denial of humanitarian access and depriving civilians of objects indispensable to their survival are also a violation of international humanitarian law, the experts warned.

The UN experts called for the protection of all humanitarian workers, after the World Health Organization (WHO) documented more than 136 attacks on health care services in the occupied Palestinian territory, including 59 attacks on the Gaza Strip, which resulted in the death of at least 16 health workers since the beginning of hostilities on 7 October. Israeli bombardment on Gaza has also killed 15 staff of the United Nations Refugee Works Agency (UNRWA) and four Palestine Red Crescent paramedics in an ambulance. An ambulance driver of Magen David Adom in Israel lost his life while driving to treat injured people.

“The complete siege of Gaza coupled with unfeasible evacuation orders and forcible population transfers, is a violation of international humanitarian and criminal law. It is also unspeakably cruel,” the experts said.

They recalled that the wilful and systematic destruction of civilian homes and infrastructure, known as ‘domicide’, and cutting off drinking water, medicine, and essential food is clearly prohibited under international criminal law.

“We are sounding the alarm: There is an ongoing campaign by Israel resulting in crimes against humanity in Gaza. Considering statements made by Israeli political leaders and their allies, accompanied by military action in Gaza and escalation of arrests and killing in the West Bank, there is also a risk of genocide against the Palestine people,” the experts said.

“There are no justifications or exceptions for such crimes. We are appalled by the inaction of the international community in the face of belligerent war-mongering,” the experts said.

“The Gazan population, half of whom are children, have already suffered many decades of unlawful brutal occupation and lived under the blockade for 16 years,” the experts said.

“It is time to immediately cease fire and ensure urgent and unimpeded access to essential humanitarian supplies, including food, water, shelter, medicine, fuel and electricity. The physical safety of the civilian population must be guaranteed,” the experts said.

“The occupation needs to end and there must be reparation, restitution and reconstruction, towards full justice for Palestinians,” they said.


https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases ... t-humanity


But..but...but. they didn't denounce Hamas thus are Hamas simps. 8O



In a land as small as the Gaza Strip, and the West Bank, I doubt it's possible to dig a tunnel under someone's house all the way to Israel and claim the people living on top of the tunnels have no knowledge of it. The Palestinians know what HAMAS is up to, they may not shoot the rockets or cut the fences, but they celebrate. How can you celebrate and claim to be ignorant? They want it done, even if they aren't the one's doing it. That's the way of Egypt, Jordan, and many others. They all straddle the fence both for and against these things, that way they have an escape politically. If public or political opinion is harmful, they back peddle. Promising support and then going back on it... I'd like to know where their sympathy is for Palestine. Untrustworthy, empty promises...


_________________
Disagreeing with you doesn't mean I hate you, it just means we disagree.

Neurocognitive exam in May 2019, diagnosed with ASD, Asperger's type in June 2019.


TwilightPrincess
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 32,784
Location: Hell

20 Oct 2023, 7:50 pm

From July 2021:

Quote:
91% of Gaza children suffer from PTSD after the Israeli attack

https://euromedmonitor.org/en/article/4 ... eli-attack

Image

I wonder what the situation will be like when this is all over and done with. Probably 99% of Gazan children will have PTSD.



Last edited by TwilightPrincess on 20 Oct 2023, 7:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

20 Oct 2023, 7:54 pm

My understanding is the PIJ operates in coordination with HAMAS. PIJ are like the little brother, they also primarily employs small-arms and mortar and rocket attacks, HAMAS tend to use heavier weapons such as ballistic missiles.



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

20 Oct 2023, 7:58 pm

TwilightPrincess wrote:
From July 2021:
Quote:
91% of Gaza children suffer from PTSD after the Israeli attack

https://euromedmonitor.org/en/article/4 ... eli-attack

Image

I wonder what the situation will be like when this is all over and done with. Probably 99% of Gazan children will have PTSD.


Just to be fair, this also impacts Israeli children as well
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6735243/

We are not playing the oppression Olympics here, but Israel has has a gargantuan task bringing up children in a geographic zone where every single country surrounding them wants to kill jews and conquer their territory.



TwilightPrincess
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 32,784
Location: Hell

20 Oct 2023, 8:03 pm

I didn't claim that it doesn't impact Israeli children or children in other countries. :| The percentage is much lower among Israeli children than Palestinian children and Palestinian children often do not have the same access to mental health services.

Quote:
While experts on conflict and trauma say both Israeli and Palestinian children will experience adverse mental health effects in the short and long-term, children living in Gaza are more vulnerable because they are poorly protected from attacks, exposed to more civilian causalities and lack mental health care.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/hea ... 144155001/

HOWEVER, every child matters. Obviously. I think I had PTSD when I was a kid, but I was not diagnosed until adulthood.

The discrimination is not one-sided. Animosity works both ways.



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

20 Oct 2023, 8:42 pm

TwilightPrincess wrote:
HOWEVER, every child matters. Obviously.

The discrimination is not one-sided. Animosity works both ways.


Agreed, if there was some way Israel could avoid civilian casualties I am sure they would take that option. The only think that will save Palestinian civilians at the moment is if Iran forces HAMAS to release all the hostages. But I am not hopeful, The current Iranian regime held US hostages back in 1979 and are still wanting to get revenge on the US

In the centre of Tehran there are giant murals of US and Istaeli flags which the public are allowed to deface. They haven't forgotten,



TwilightPrincess
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 32,784
Location: Hell

20 Oct 2023, 8:55 pm

cyberdad wrote:
TwilightPrincess wrote:
HOWEVER, every child matters. Obviously.

The discrimination is not one-sided. Animosity works both ways.


Agreed, if there was some way Israel could avoid civilian casualties I am sure they would take that option.

What makes you "sure" that they would avoid civilian casualties if they could? That sounds like personal bias. I'm not "sure" about that regarding any government.

The IDF has a history of unnecessarily attacking civilians, homes, and healthcare services and violating international humanitarian laws. It's what they're doing now, and it's not okay according to organizations who are concerned about human rights such as the UN.



Jakki
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2019
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,975
Location: Outter Quadrant

20 Oct 2023, 9:20 pm

Dox47 wrote:
Recidivist wrote:

There is a vibe in this thread that I can't put my finger on, but maybe that's just me as I tend to stick to light-hearted threads.


One side is afraid to fully voice their opinions, but it's not the side that usually has that problem, and they're not used to what it feels like.


^^^^^^^^^^^^~~~~ 8O 8O 8O 8O :nerdy: 8O 8O 8O 8O ~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^


This is obviously off topic : Non sementic ~Non anti semetic rehetoric....
he..he..he...ha..ha..ha. :lol:


_________________
Diagnosed hfa
Loves velcro,
Quote:
where ever you go ,there you are


goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

21 Oct 2023, 9:59 am

I kind of get some older peoples' attitudes towards various wars around the world when they say stuff like "Why do we let this continue on forever? Why don't those in power just pick a side and carpet bomb the other side out of existence ? Problem permanently solved." kind of thing.

I know that sounds REALLY BAD, but I kinda get it. Allied soldiers get sent off to die in repeat wars in various countries over and over and over and over again, along with all kinds of supplies, weaponry, etc etc.. but you'd think if military action were going to, and ever meant to, solve a conflict they'd just solve it permanently and be done with the whole bs game.

Too simplistic and not how the world works, I know that, too. And even if powerful nations chose a side and carpet bombed the other into oblivion 100% completely, some other nation-tribe-terrorist.org would get their panties in a bunch and become the next enemy; rinse & repeat selling bullets like shampoo.. a never ending cycle of sending money straight down the drain.

Just kind of sick of it and really do wish some nation or another Could "just get on with it," if they're going to murder people and then just get all the murdering done and put all these endless wars behind us. But surely the righteous become the terrorists and someone else will be determined to unseat them from their position of power.. so, I guess we're going to keep doing this stupid s**t until we've bombed and burned everything beyond the Earth's capacity to heal and we'll no longer need bombs for heat to kill each other - the Sun will do that job just fine after we've taken out all the shade cover provided by trees that used to grow where spent munitions got planted instead.

So ridiculous that humans consider ourselves intelligent beings while we're fast at work ensuring we make our home planet uninhabitable for all but tardigrades & various extremophiles that can survive in acidic oceans. If only we'd have evolved into the everlasting crab formation that seems to not change for hundreds of Millions of years. Maybe our ghosty spirits are crab shaped in the ether? Hmmm.. :?

So, anyways - cheers to another day of murdering each other over territory, skin colour, religious fanaticism and all the other BS that gets in the way of cooperatively working to heal the planet we all rely on for the perpetuation of our entire species both here and any possibility of becoming star faring. *sips coffee*


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

21 Oct 2023, 10:18 am

Recidivist wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
Recidivist wrote:
^ I find it interesting that slogans like this appear acceptable today but if this was posted 3 years ago you would have been edumecated , this is not a slight at you TP just an observation, I personally have no problem with the slogan.

What are you talking about?

"Black LIves Matter" is more than three years old (both as an organization, and as a slogan).


Yeah I know when it started but I believe the pushback against it started about 3 years ago on WP. Find me an earlier post than 3 years ago that pushes back against the slogan ( i.e White Lives Matter , Blue Lives Matter etc ) and I'll edit my post accordingly.


My point is that ...I cant figure out what your point is.

Using BLM, or derived slogans, was perfectly acceptable three years ago. And its till acceptable now. So what is the problem that You are alluding to?



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

21 Oct 2023, 10:25 am

goldfish21 wrote:
I kind of get
w*



The boundaries of the "nations" of the Middle East are set up in a way that INSURES "forever wars".

The whole Middle East had been ruled by the Ottoman Empire for four plus centuries. It collapsed at the end of the First World War. So Britain and France carved up the middle East between themselves. And did so with little regard for the ethnic groups in the region. Lumping together hostile groups into one unit, and also splitting up the same group among different nations (notably the Kurds). So you ended up with a bunch of jury-rigged dysfunctional nations slapped together with duct tape (Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, are all good examples).

And that was even BEFORE you add Zionism to the mix. The creation of the Jewish state out of Palestine added even more spice to the cocktail.



Recidivist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2023
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,851
Location: He/him/his

21 Oct 2023, 12:23 pm

naturalplastic wrote:

My point is that ...I cant figure out what your point is.

Using BLM, or derived slogans, was perfectly acceptable three years ago. And its till acceptable now. So what is the problem that You are alluding to?


Your recollection of 3 years ago is different to mine, so obviously you don't understand my comment, we were clearly in parallel timelines - Mandela Effect ?

It wasn't really a point anyway, it was more me typing a thought that came into my head.


_________________
Another man's freedom fighter, one man's terrorist is - Yoda (probably)


naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

21 Oct 2023, 1:25 pm

Recidivist wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:

My point is that ...I cant figure out what your point is.

Using BLM, or derived slogans, was perfectly acceptable three years ago. And its till acceptable now. So what is the problem that You are alluding to?


Your recollection of 3 years ago is different to mine, so obviously you don't understand my comment, we were clearly in parallel timelines - Mandela Effect ?

It wasn't really a point anyway, it was more me typing a thought that came into my head.


My recollections are similar to yours. Folks got hysterical at hearing the BLM slogan. And would be inspired to ...dump into their own pants and make fools of themselves by spouting nonsense in response. Sometimes it was sad. Sometimes it was amusing. Never observed anyone make an actual legit argument that the slogan was improper in anyway. Ergo it was acceptable then. Just as it is now. Maybe you read a post that actually persuaded you that it was wrong to use the slogan. If so then I musta missed seeing that post.



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

21 Oct 2023, 8:48 pm

naturalplastic wrote:
[So Britain and France carved up the middle East between themselves. And did so with little regard for the ethnic groups in the region. Lumping together hostile groups into one unit, and also splitting up the same group among different nations (notably the Kurds). So you ended up with a bunch of jury-rigged dysfunctional nations slapped together with duct tape (Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, are all good examples).

And that was even BEFORE you add Zionism to the mix. The creation of the Jewish state out of Palestine added even more spice to the cocktail.


In 1945 there was collective guilt by the UK and the USA for erecting barriers to prevent Jewish refugees to leave Germany and enter their countries. Many millions of Jews were left to dogs to fend for themselves with the Nazis.

The British already had committed themselves after WWI in 1917 through the Balfour declaration to set up a Jewish state in Palestine. Jewish militant groups were already attacking British troops in Palestine (which was a British protectorate) in the late 1940s so that also gave the Brits an incentive to leave Palestine.

While many blame Britain for the problems of setting up the state of Israel, in many ways they had no choice but to deliver what they promised to Jewish people way back in 1917 as otherwise the European Jewish diaspora who survived the war would want to enter the UK and US (and probably Australia, Canada, South Africa and other Anglo-sphere countries).



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

21 Oct 2023, 8:58 pm

TwilightPrincess wrote:
What makes you "sure" that they would avoid civilian casualties if they could? That sounds like personal bias. I'm not "sure" about that regarding any government.


Liberal democracies abide the rule of law which means they need to avoid civilian casualties. Almost all the middle eastern countries that surround the state of Israel are non-democratic authoritarian regimes who regularly engage human rights violations (some of the worst offenders are playgrounds for the rich and famous from America and Europe like Dubai).