blauSamstag wrote:
SaNcheNuSS wrote:
If it was genetic then autism would actually decrease instead of increase. Think Darwin and natural selection.
You're inappropriately conflating "genetic" with "inherited".
Studies show that the probability of genetic defects increases with the age of the mother at the time of conception.
The last 70 years have seen a steady increase in the average age of pregnancy in women who live in developed countries. Largely attributed to women seeking education and career.
Do the math and tell me what you think.
Blame game topic
Of course. Now educated women are being blamed for having children with "genetic defects". A tidy and inaccurate kneejerk approach.
This is a variant on fridge moms, and maybe even tiger moms. No mention of dads, not that any one reason is a root cause.
Please see Orwell's post below about autism: (
My bolding)
Orwell wrote:Quote:
Autism is not like blue eyes. It is not a boolean trait at all, and inheritance of it is not as simple as you seem to think. Engineers and other technical types (even when they are not autistic) very frequently have autistic children, as do plenty of other "normal" folks
.
_________________
Radiant Aspergian
Awe-Tistic Whirlwind
Phuture Phounder of the Philosophy Phactory
NOT a believer of Mystic Woo-Woo