Page 5 of 12 [ 190 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 12  Next

Asp-Z
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Dec 2009
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,018

15 Nov 2011, 12:17 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
1. Because I am intelligent I should have somehow known something about hedge fund managers..whatever the hell that is and somehow have made billions so I could enjoy capitalism more and thus not disagree with you're oh so wonderful opinion on capitalism? seems like a crappy way to use my intelligence.


See, you don't even know much about the system you say will collapse. That's another issue here: the people who predict the end of capitalism tend not to actually know much about it.

If you don't have at least a basic understanding of how financial derivitives and investment works, what position are you in to claim it will collapse? Goldman Sachs sure seem to be making decent profits.

Quote:
2. I did not say I thought Marxism would work as a better system, I said Marx predicted what would happen to capitalism.......and it seems that prediction is not too far off......hence the reason he was probably motivated to try and come up with another way to do things..........not that is way would be perfect either. The point with that is ever since I was in about 9th grade I started questioning things going on in my country and never again would simply trust whatever is said on t.v or in the news or whatever.


As I said, even the Great Depression didn't bring down capitalism, I doubt a double dip recession would either.

Quote:
3. It seems to be what everyone is bitching about.........so I'll look it up, maybe those aren't perfectly accurate so I can certainly go get a more clear picture. But that is what we were talking about in sociology, though that might have been specifically the U.S or the World in general so I'll look that up again. But its not just 'socialists' who are fed up with things just so you know.


Go show me a reliable source for that statistic, go on.



Gedrene
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,725

15 Nov 2011, 12:17 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
Gedrene wrote:
Humn, I disagree with both of you really. The system isn't going to fix itself without public pressure. At the same time it is not really set to fall.

At the same time we don't need false statistics or name-calling.


I was not tryig to post fals statistics, those are the statistics I have seen.......sorry if they were wrong. But I thought one of the main problems going on was a rather small amount of the population controls most of the worlds wealth and would like to keep it that way. I mean considering how many people belive this and some of what I have seen I belive that to be true.........but maybe 1% having 90% of the wealth is not quite exact I would imagine its somewhere close to that though.

It's 1% owns 20% of the wealth in the USA.

That's still too high really. Only micronations or really strange abnomalies should cause such disparities in a health economy.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

15 Nov 2011, 12:20 pm

Gedrene wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Gedrene wrote:
Humn, I disagree with both of you really. The system isn't going to fix itself without public pressure. At the same time it is not really set to fall.

At the same time we don't need false statistics or name-calling.


I was not tryig to post fals statistics, those are the statistics I have seen.......sorry if they were wrong. But I thought one of the main problems going on was a rather small amount of the population controls most of the worlds wealth and would like to keep it that way. I mean considering how many people belive this and some of what I have seen I belive that to be true.........but maybe 1% having 90% of the wealth is not quite exact I would imagine its somewhere close to that though.

It's 1% owns 20% of the wealth in the USA.

That's still too high really. Only micronations or really strange abnomalies should cause such disparities in a health economy.


Ok well maybe I am thinking of the world then....because it is true in the U.S though there are lots of people struggling just to get by and more and more people ending up homeless we do still have the upper middle class, some amount of a middle class ect so in the U.S specifically that probably is more accurate. Some countries have the government or ruling class with all the wealth and all the citizens are poor.......so it's not quite that extreme in the U.S yet.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

15 Nov 2011, 12:28 pm

Asp-Z wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
1. Because I am intelligent I should have somehow known something about hedge fund managers..whatever the hell that is and somehow have made billions so I could enjoy capitalism more and thus not disagree with you're oh so wonderful opinion on capitalism? seems like a crappy way to use my intelligence.


See, you don't even know much about the system you say will collapse. That's another issue here: the people who predict the end of capitalism tend not to actually know much about it.

If you don't have at least a basic understanding of how financial derivitives and investment works, what position are you in to claim it will collapse? Goldman Sachs sure seem to be making decent profits.

Quote:
2. I did not say I thought Marxism would work as a better system, I said Marx predicted what would happen to capitalism.......and it seems that prediction is not too far off......hence the reason he was probably motivated to try and come up with another way to do things..........not that is way would be perfect either. The point with that is ever since I was in about 9th grade I started questioning things going on in my country and never again would simply trust whatever is said on t.v or in the news or whatever.


As I said, even the Great Depression didn't bring down capitalism, I doubt a double dip recession would either.

Quote:
3. It seems to be what everyone is bitching about.........so I'll look it up, maybe those aren't perfectly accurate so I can certainly go get a more clear picture. But that is what we were talking about in sociology, though that might have been specifically the U.S or the World in general so I'll look that up again. But its not just 'socialists' who are fed up with things just so you know.


Go show me a reliable source for that statistic, go on.


I said I don't know much about hedge fund managers or whatever you said..........I understand how capitalism works on basic terms, but no I am not an expert and specifics can sometimes confuse me since I've always been a bit on the poor side so I haven't really been exposed to specific goings on that would happen between rich people who are probably the ones actually involved in those processes.

I understand capitalism is a free market system.........and there is a lot about competition, taking out the opposition(as in try to do better then other companies to get more buisness) and so basically I disagree with a system based upon competition as too much competition can be rather unhealthy.......competition is not always the best way to get things done. I don't have to be an expert on capitalism to disagree with the current system..........besides there are pleanty of people who know less about socialism/communism than I do about capitialism who have no issue ripping on both those ideas so lets be fair.

K that statistic refers to the world population more than the U.S population.......it was the statistic I saw in sociology class the professor wrote in on the board, and we saw a documentary called the 1% that also went into it.......sorry that's all I got.



b9
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,003
Location: australia

15 Nov 2011, 12:36 pm

ruveyn wrote:
b9 wrote:
i think that the value of money is notional. money is worth what people believe it is worth.
the concept, and utilization of "money" i believe is crucial to the workings of a complex society.



Money is a convention. We have it because pure barter in a complex society is a practical impossibility.

ruveyn

that i beleve is correct.
if all you have is pineapples and mangoes, then your market that you can shop in is extremely limited.

i understand that conventions must be agreed upon in order for a congruent relationship to flourish, and there are millions of extremely bright people who would not lose their grip on the reins of their businesses simply due to "very bad news",

in the aftermath of an economic collapse, people will regroup and prosperity will continue because of the determination of separate people to succeed.


people are very smart, and industry will not be crushed by economic mistakes (as i believe)



Asp-Z
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Dec 2009
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,018

15 Nov 2011, 12:42 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
I said I don't know much about hedge fund managers or whatever you said..........I understand how capitalism works on basic terms, but no I am not an expert and specifics can sometimes confuse me since I've always been a bit on the poor side so I haven't really been exposed to specific goings on that would happen between rich people who are probably the ones actually involved in those processes.


If you're claiming that a system will fail, you need to have a proper understanding of it. Go research how investment banks and the like actually work, the information's all out there online for free.

Quote:
I understand capitalism is a free market system.........and there is a lot about competition, taking out the opposition(as in try to do better then other companies to get more buisness) and so basically I disagree with a system based upon competition as too much competition can be rather unhealthy.......competition is not always the best way to get things done. I don't have to be an expert on capitalism to disagree with the current system..........besides there are pleanty of people who know less about socialism/communism than I do about capitialism who have no issue ripping on both those ideas so lets be fair.


Competition is good, it means that only the best possible goods and services survive while inferior products must either make up for their low quality with a low price or go out of business. If we had state monopolies instead, quality and efficiency would fall, as we can see had happened historically in socialist and capitalist states.

As I said, you can do your research on this stuff online, don't dismiss logic with ignorance, we're not NTs ;)

Quote:
K that statistic refers to the world population more than the U.S population.......it was the statistic I saw in sociology class the professor wrote in on the board, and we saw a documentary called the 1% that also went into it.......sorry that's all I got.


Exactly, so it includes third world countries and the like. It's therefore utterly irrelevant to the capitalism of the US or any other specific country, yet it's the statistic the Occupy protesters are using, probably because the real statistics don't help their cause all too well.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

15 Nov 2011, 12:44 pm

b9 wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
b9 wrote:
i think that the value of money is notional. money is worth what people believe it is worth.
the concept, and utilization of "money" i believe is crucial to the workings of a complex society.



Money is a convention. We have it because pure barter in a complex society is a practical impossibility.

ruveyn

that i beleve is correct.
if all you have is pineapples and mangoes, then your market that you can shop in is extremely limited.

i understand that conventions must be agreed upon in order for a congruent relationship to flourish, and there are millions of extremely bright people who would not lose their grip on the reins of their businesses simply due to "very bad news", and they will not relinquish their grip on their business easily.

in the aftermath of an economic collapse, people will regroup and prosperity will continue because of the determination of separate people to succeed.


people are very smart, and industry will not be crushed by economic mistakes (as i believe)


Define success, if having a system which is fine with abandoning some of its members is success than I guess I don't like 'success'......and if people where so smart why aren't we using all the resources and techology we have to better the world for all people? Oh yes we have the technolgy and the resources for just about everyone to live a somewhat comfortable life......but why put that to use when we can have wars, homeless people, people struggling just to feed their families, were would be the fun if you didn't have to work a job you hate for some company that does not care about you and still struggle just to make ends meet.

There are different ways to do things, But I guess so many people see Capitalism as their god........well capitalism is not a deity it is another failed idea.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

15 Nov 2011, 12:52 pm

Asp-Z wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
I said I don't know much about hedge fund managers or whatever you said..........I understand how capitalism works on basic terms, but no I am not an expert and specifics can sometimes confuse me since I've always been a bit on the poor side so I haven't really been exposed to specific goings on that would happen between rich people who are probably the ones actually involved in those processes.


If you're claiming that a system will fail, you need to have a proper understanding of it. Go research how investment banks and the like actually work, the information's all out there online for free.

Ok point out where I lack the understanding nessisary for my opinion? I am not sure what you meant about the hedge fund thing is all sorry didn't think it was that big of a deal.

Quote:
I understand capitalism is a free market system.........and there is a lot about competition, taking out the opposition(as in try to do better then other companies to get more buisness) and so basically I disagree with a system based upon competition as too much competition can be rather unhealthy.......competition is not always the best way to get things done. I don't have to be an expert on capitalism to disagree with the current system..........besides there are pleanty of people who know less about socialism/communism than I do about capitialism who have no issue ripping on both those ideas so lets be fair.


Competition is good, it means that only the best possible goods and services survive while inferior products must either make up for their low quality with a low price or go out of business. If we had state monopolies instead, quality and efficiency would fall, as we can see had happened historically in socialist and capitalist states. As I said, you can do your research on this stuff online, don't dismiss logic with ignorance, we're not NTs ;)

Competition can be good in some situations, but I don't think it should be the basis for an economic/political system that is supposed to more or less provide certain things to its people. I don't suggest we should have state monopolies nessisarly....but I think there is more to life then trying to one up everyone else I guess. Also, the companies that keep going are not always the ones with the better products......sorry but walmart does not have better products than most places that have gone out of buisness because of it.........they have cheap products made in china and shipped here.

And I think I know what competition is and how it works, so I don't feel I need to research it anymore.


Quote:
K that statistic refers to the world population more than the U.S population.......it was the statistic I saw in sociology class the professor wrote in on the board, and we saw a documentary called the 1% that also went into it.......sorry that's all I got.


Exactly, so it includes third world countries and the like. It's therefore utterly irrelevant to the capitalism of the US or any other specific country, yet it's the statistic the Occupy protesters are using, probably because the real statistics don't help their cause all too well.


Not really, maybe you should do some research on how the U.S has contributed to many of the worlds problems....Economic Hit Man is a good book and well just look around, a lot of the world is not pissed of at the United States for no reason. I imagine the protesters are aware of the negitive infuence U.S capitalism has on the world. It would be nice if the feds and the huge corporations were only screwing over this nation.....then at least it would not be the entire worlds problem but no it extends much further than within the borders of the U.S.



Asp-Z
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Dec 2009
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,018

15 Nov 2011, 1:03 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
Ok point out where I lack the understanding nessisary for my opinion? I am not sure what you meant about the hedge fund thing is all sorry didn't think it was that big of a deal.


Well you can't claim to know a system will fail if you don't understand it properly, can you? I know the basics of how investment banking, derivatives, and so on all work, and I know basic economic theories, so I can make an informed judgement, and really, it doesn't take that much effort to get yourself clued up on that stuff too.

Quote:
Competition can be good in some situations, but I don't think it should be the basis for an economic/political system that is supposed to more or less provide certain things to its people. I don't suggest we should have state monopolies nessisarly....but I think there is more to life then trying to one up everyone else I guess. Also, the companies that keep going are not always the ones with the better products......sorry but walmart does not have better products than most places that have gone out of buisness because of it.........they have cheap products made in china and shipped here.


There's no better system currently in existence, and besides, just because companies are always trying to compete (and therefore offer us better products), it doesn't mean people as a whole have to, does it?

And I said that if the products are low quality then they need to make up for that with low prices, which is what Wal-Mart does. Their business model is very smart actually. Not necessarily ethical, but smart.

Quote:
Not really, maybe you should do some research on how the U.S has contributed to many of the worlds problems....Economic Hit Man is a good book and well just look around, a lot of the world is not pissed of at the United States for no reason. I imagine the protesters are aware of the negitive infuence U.S capitalism has on the world. It would be nice if the feds and the huge corporations were only screwing over this nation.....then at least it would not be the entire worlds problem but no it extends much further than within the borders of the U.S.


US politics influences the world, yes, and I'm not here to debate politics with you. But capitalism isn't the reason behind that.



Gedrene
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,725

15 Nov 2011, 1:10 pm

Asp-Z wrote:
US politics influences the world, yes, and I'm not here to debate politics with you. But capitalism isn't the reason behind that.
American business is though. For example the US backed coup in Guatemala.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

15 Nov 2011, 1:14 pm

Asp-Z wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Ok point out where I lack the understanding nessisary for my opinion? I am not sure what you meant about the hedge fund thing is all sorry didn't think it was that big of a deal.


Well you can't claim to know a system will fail if you don't understand it properly, can you? I know the basics of how investment banking, derivatives, and so on all work, and I know basic economic theories, so I can make an informed judgement, and really, it doesn't take that much effort to get yourself clued up on that stuff too.

Quote:
Competition can be good in some situations, but I don't think it should be the basis for an economic/political system that is supposed to more or less provide certain things to its people. I don't suggest we should have state monopolies nessisarly....but I think there is more to life then trying to one up everyone else I guess. Also, the companies that keep going are not always the ones with the better products......sorry but walmart does not have better products than most places that have gone out of buisness because of it.........they have cheap products made in china and shipped here.


There's no better system currently in existence, and besides, just because companies are always trying to compete (and therefore offer us better products), it doesn't mean people as a whole have to, does it?

And I said that if the products are low quality then they need to make up for that with low prices, which is what Wal-Mart does. Their business model is very smart actually. Not necessarily ethical, but smart.

Quote:
Not really, maybe you should do some research on how the U.S has contributed to many of the worlds problems....Economic Hit Man is a good book and well just look around, a lot of the world is not pissed of at the United States for no reason. I imagine the protesters are aware of the negitive infuence U.S capitalism has on the world. It would be nice if the feds and the huge corporations were only screwing over this nation.....then at least it would not be the entire worlds problem but no it extends much further than within the borders of the U.S.


US politics influences the world, yes, and I'm not here to debate politics with you. But capitalism isn't the reason behind that.


I understand what capitalism is, how it works and how it's flawed.........I don't know all the details about every single thing that goes into capitalism, I have not studied economics in college so yeah I am not an expert but since when does one have to be an expert to have an opinion? I don't like the way capitalism works as a political/economic system.......because it seems to leave a lot of room for people to get f*cked over I think that is a fairly reasonable reason for not worshiping capitalism like its a god.

I think the way they have things set up in scandinavia is pretty effective for the majority of people, so I don't know that it's accurate to say U.S capitalism is the best system currently in the world......that would be an 'opinion' Also they encourage a lot of negitive behavior at an early age like at school and such.....this negitive behavior kind of seems to immitate the economic attitude of capitalism.........if it does not create massive amounts of profit screw it. If the citizens would rather have marijuana legal for instance but if the feds and corporations that obviously build and run prisons makes more from arresting people for it what are they going to do? probably keep having people arrested.

Also low prices at what cost, paying chinese workers sh*t wages while putting buisnesses that actually provide employment for U.S citizens out of buisness......capitalism is not all rainbows and cup cakes I guess.

Oh you're not here to debate politics with me, yet you have been going on and on and on about how completely wrong you think I am about politics and economics. That makes no sense.......and as much as you try to deny it yes capitalism Definitly contributed to the problems in the world I am referring to........but you're not here to debate 'politics' so I suppose you don't care about the details.



JWC
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 740
Location: Macondo Wellhead

15 Nov 2011, 1:16 pm

Gedrene wrote:
Asp-Z wrote:
US politics influences the world, yes, and I'm not here to debate politics with you. But capitalism isn't the reason behind that.
American business is though. For example the US backed coup in Guatemala.


But that is still not because of capitalism. Capitalism does not condone gov't intervention into the economy. You cannot blame capitalism for the actions of businessmen who do not practice it.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

15 Nov 2011, 1:21 pm

JWC wrote:
Gedrene wrote:
Asp-Z wrote:
US politics influences the world, yes, and I'm not here to debate politics with you. But capitalism isn't the reason behind that.
American business is though. For example the US backed coup in Guatemala.


But that is still not because of capitalism. Capitalism does not condone gov't intervention into the economy. You cannot blame capitalism for the actions of businessmen who do not practice it.


Oh dear lord..........go read Economic Hit Man. But I will do my best.....that is percisly an issue that comes up. Some countries would like to intervene in what the U.S would like to do in their countries but corrupt politicians like to give in to large amounts of money. The people in charge of the very powerful corporations and the federal government seem to think they should have the right to do whatever they want in any country they choose.

But yeah I really don't have the time to go list a bunch of examples of this at the moment cause I have to head to class.......but when I come back maybe I will.



Asp-Z
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Dec 2009
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,018

15 Nov 2011, 1:24 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
I understand what capitalism is, how it works and how it's flawed.........I don't know all the details about every single thing that goes into capitalism, I have not studied economics in college so yeah I am not an expert but since when does one have to be an expert to have an opinion? I don't like the way capitalism works as a political/economic system.......because it seems to leave a lot of room for people to get f*cked over I think that is a fairly reasonable reason for not worshiping capitalism like its a god.


Generic statements about something does not understanding make. As I said, learn about how it actually works instead of talking about how evil it is.

Quote:
I think the way they have things set up in scandinavia is pretty effective for the majority of people, so I don't know that it's accurate to say U.S capitalism is the best system currently in the world......


I never said such a thing. I don't care about the US specifically at all.

Quote:
that would be an 'opinion' Also they encourage a lot of negitive behavior at an early age like at school and such.....this negitive behavior kind of seems to immitate the economic attitude of capitalism.........if it does not create massive amounts of profit screw it. If the citizens would rather have marijuana legal for instance but if the feds and corporations that obviously build and run prisons makes more from arresting people for it what are they going to do? probably keep having people arrested.


Again, you are confusing politics and economics with each other. I'm not debating political issues with you.

And since when was the legialistion of marijuana an opposition to capitalism?

Quote:
Also low prices at what cost, paying chinese workers sh*t wages while putting buisnesses that actually provide employment for U.S citizens out of buisness......capitalism is not all rainbows and cup cakes I guess.


I never said Wal-Mart was ethical.

Quote:
Oh you're not here to debate politics with me, yet you have been going on and on and on about how completely wrong you think I am about politics and economics. That makes no sense.......and as much as you try to deny it yes capitalism Definitly contributed to the problems in the world I am referring to........but you're not here to debate 'politics' so I suppose you don't care about the details.


I'm debating economics, you're the one bringing up political issues. And capitalism may cause problems - I never claimed it was perfect - but socialism causes more. As I keep telling you, look at history.



b9
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,003
Location: australia

15 Nov 2011, 1:24 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:

Define success, if having a system which is fine with abandoning some of its members is success than I guess I don't like 'success'.
.
you make your own success. it is not awarded to you by your "world" of expectation, but you can do what you are good at.

you very much have a forlorn nature about you and i hope you prevail and do not hurt yourself.
i like you even if i can not communicate with you.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

15 Nov 2011, 1:25 pm

JWC wrote:
Gedrene wrote:
Asp-Z wrote:
US politics influences the world, yes, and I'm not here to debate politics with you. But capitalism isn't the reason behind that.
American business is though. For example the US backed coup in Guatemala.


But that is still not because of capitalism. Capitalism does not condone gov't intervention into the economy. You cannot blame capitalism for the actions of businessmen who do not practice it.


This is not entirely true. The mega corporate capitalists love government intervention when it prevents competitors, upstart entrepreneurial firms from getting a leg up on them. They also love interventions that privatize profits and socializes losses. Many of the big companies were only too happy to receive bailouts and handouts from the government.

Genuine capitalists of the lassaize faire verity are rather scarce. The big corporations types the Crony Capitalists talk a good free enterprise game but rarely play it.

ruveyn