It's all about Trump, as usual
Once again, I said "Because there's too many things both laughable and cringe worthy coming from both camps." There's nothing in that statement that indicates I'm talking about "the level of negativity towards each other". You're clearly setting up a false premise.
Once again, I said "Because there's too many things both laughable and cringe worthy coming from both camps." There's nothing in that statement that indicates I'm talking about "the level of negativity towards each other". You're clearly setting up a false premise.
So, you never complained about the negativity or rather to go more extreme vilification of Trump and his supporters by the left?
My question above is based on a false premise, or assumption, and you've never shown concern in that?
I have commented on the idea of wholesale labeling and lynch mob mentality. I'm I actually worried about it? not really. slightly concerned? perhaps. Really it's about the negative light liberals have put themselves in in this manner, because it goes against what they originally espoused and displays a mentality they originally accused and condemned the right over having in statements like, if hillary loses the left will be sad, but if trump loses the right will be mad. The left sets itself as being at a higher standard than the right, therefore I'm going to be more critical of the good guys behaving badly, than I am of the bad guys behaving badly.
It was a false premise based on the quote you based it on.
So, you went from saying you didn't talk about the negativity (or to use your words - vilification) that the left shows the right and now you're saying you are concerned about it.
Okay. Now we're getting somewhere.
You derailed this topic on the first page by complaining about it being about Trump as usual. I never would've called attention to it but ThoughtBeast isn't harming anyone so it kinda got caught on my radar.
My assumption is that part of the reason you don't like that the forum is filled with Trump topics is because most of them are of a vilifying nature (vilifying the right, being something that you have already showed yourself to be concerned about).
Now, all I'm asking for is evidence - a couple of links (hell, I'll be generous and say just one), if you're a centrist it shouldn't be much of a problem - that you don't have a bent and you called people on the right for vilifying the left as well.
Show me my premise is wrong and that you have called out Trump supporters. All I'm asking for is evidence, it shouldn't be that hard to come up with for someone that doesn't change their story.
You're saying my assumption is wrong, show me with evidence that it is.
I said it didn't exists in the quote you provided as an example.
I doubt it.
I think I've indulged you enough newbie and it's gotten boring. I really couldn't care less what you think of me or how you want to pigeonhole and label me and others. That's your problem not mine. To me this whole discourse has been about as meaningful as playing a game of checkers. I suppose you'll need to have a last string of words and claim a mock victory and all that. I've seen it before in those who came in like a wannabe storm in and then disappeared like a fart in the wind. If I was actually paranoid I'd be pretty certain you're a sockpuppet, but I'm sure it's just a coincidence you sound so familiar.
Figured. To put your mind at ease, this is the only message board I go to.
I think this is important to bring attention to - if you didn’t go after ThoughtBeast I would have left you alone. ThoughtBeast’s special interest is the news and news about Trump and this is how he expresses it. He isn’t harming anyone and there was no reason to ridicule him or go after him for it. The only reason I can think of is wanting to vent your concern.
That’s it, call me an SJW or what have you. I’ve said piece.
lulz that's your biggest backpedal yet. And you're supposed to be some kind of champion for trying to give a moderate to severely autistic kid a really hard time, instead of just acting like an adult and basically saying what you said above in the first place? Absolute nonsense. You're good at keeping this going by coming up with more ridiculousness for me to shoot down. So what's your next bait?
This is about the time a mod will come in and say "enough" and or lock this thread.
This is about the time a mod will come in and say "enough" and or lock this thread.
Kid, you said your piece already and it was very telling as well. Just cool off and get some sleep or whatever. To try to encourage you to move on and cool down, this will be my final rely to you. Peace.
This is about the time a mod will come in and say "enough" and or lock this thread.
Kid, you said your piece already and it was very telling as well. Just cool off and get some sleep or whatever. Peace.
very telling you how ridiculous you've been.
This is about the time a mod will come in and say "enough" and or lock this thread.
Kid, you said your piece already and it was very telling as well. Just cool off and get some sleep or whatever. Peace.
very telling you how ridiculous you've been.
Since you replied before I could edit this in -
To try to encourage you to move on and cool down, this will be my final rely to you. Peace.
Last edited by Spooky_Mulder on 29 Sep 2018, 1:01 am, edited 2 times in total.
This is about the time a mod will come in and say "enough" and or lock this thread.
Kid, you said your piece already and it was very telling as well. Just cool off and get some sleep or whatever. Peace.
very telling you how ridiculous you've been.
Since you replied before I could edit this in -
To try to encourage you to move on and cool down, this will be my final rely to you. Peace.
I'm always cool. Don't you know what autistic flat effect is?
Last edited by EzraS on 29 Sep 2018, 1:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
Actually had to look it up. I just thought it was a different term for high functioning or showed few signs (and yes, I know you aren't moderate to severe - if you are, I truly am a very poor judge of character).
Lol you changed what you originally posted, but not before I captured it as a quote
You already surmised (or more likely read) that I was "in the mid or lower end".
Then you changed that to:
You are either really good at switching and baiting or a total trainwreck poster.
waiting for your umpteenth final post.
Yes I said that and I was being sarcastic when I did, I don't see a reason to deny it nor did I. I changed it since it could be considered offensive to people who are; you, however, I know are high-functioning. Unless you're not and you're moderate to severe? In which case tell me and I apologize since it doesn't seem it.
I think this is important to bring attention to - if you didn’t go after ThoughtBeast I would have left you alone. ThoughtBeast’s special interest is the news and news about Trump and this is how he expresses it. He isn’t harming anyone and there was no reason to ridicule him or go after him for it. The only reason I can think of is wanting to vent your concern.
That’s it, call me an SJW or what have you. I’ve said piece.
Thanks, Spooky.
Ezra is completely ridiculous in his critique of posts here.
1. "Flooding" is not posting 3-5 posts per day.
2. Just because posts relate somehow to Trump (and negatively) does not amount to spamming.
Each item has its own story to tell.
*Trump puts children in cages.
*Trump regime threatens to arrest Genocide Court judges.
*Trump nominates perp for Supreme Court
and so on. Each of these is an individual story. What Ezra is trying to do is to pull a con here. Practically everything I post here relates to the US in some way, so it could just as easily be claimed that I (or anyone else) is "flooding" the news with articles about the US. Sheer nonsense!
3. Ezra rarely (if ever) posts articles. Now, that's his right, of course. But it's disingenuous for Ezra to whine about all the articles allegedly being about one subject while declining to post articles of his own. They could be Trump articles, anti-Trump articles, articles about science, medicine, sports, culture &c. Whatever interests Ezra. But he doesn't post anything. Those who don't contribute have very limited cred when it comes to complaining about the articles posted by those who do, especially when they complain that articles that they artificially claim to be of a particular type predominate. If Ezra posted 3-5 articles per day (along with any other complainers) then it would be obvious that the news forum is not at all being "flooded" with articles about Trump.
4. This last part isn't about Ezra in particular. It's just interesting to note how the whining about posting of articles that show Trump in the bad light that he has generated for himself seems to accelerate whenever an election is approaching, like the midterms that arrive in about 5-1/2 weeks from now.
5. If any moderator is going to lock this thread, my guess is it will be because of Ezra's misconduct in making personal attacks on others over fictitious claims of flooding and spamming.
I said you were being sarcastic? Nope.

I'm not playing victim here. I just think you attempting to badger and belittle someone you viewed as a "in the mid or lower end kid" as you being some kind of hero, absolutely hilarious.
Yes that's right, you've been going at it with a moderate to severely autistic "kid" with learning disabilities (well documented here going back 5 years) and getting trounced in the process. My flat effect tendency fails me here because I'm lmao.
