Mueller findings do not conclude Trump committed crime

Post Reply New Topic

Chomsky was correct. Every US President after WWII would have been hung at Nuremberg. There's no point going through the record with people who just make absurd excuses because their country or party leader is carrying out the war crimes. Let me know what I've been wrong about, I've been wrong a lot in the past and learned from it. I didn't make pathetic excuses and deflect.

There's a huge difference between unintended casualties, and purposely killing civilians and wounded when fighting armed combatants. Few American Presidents could be accused of murder with intent.

Leftism attracts people who are looking for a savior, and their saviors always let them down.

You seem to be humoring Trump's messiah complex though.

The president will not save you. He does not care about you. He cares about money he can make from your idol worship. Criticism of people looking for a "savior" is pretty rich coming from lackeys of the guy who supposedly fixed everything by himself.

They aren't unintended. EVERY single one is guilty of mass murder and war crimes. The drone campaign is international terrorism, mass murder and kills innocent civilians and the targets have no trial. If you support that then you must support the death penalty without trial. And no, it's not 'derp derp terrorist'. That's Trump and Obama guilty of that. Bush was a torturer and mass murderer. Clinton bombed pharmaceutical facilities. I could go back and back but I'm not interested in hearing sickening excuses for murder.

I'll give you Bush, but to say that most of the drone strikes purposely killed civilians simply isn't true. If you argued that they were irresponsible with the lives of civilians, you'd have more ground to stand on.
And yes, there were terrorists who had blood on their hands who were put out of our misery. As taking said terrorists into custody would have been impossible, letting them walk free would possibly have meant more innocent death. So derpy-derp-derp!

Ronnie Reagan would also qualify given he intentionally propped up murderous regimes using death squads such as Chile, Nicaragua and the Apartheid government of South Africa.

I think to be fair the democrats haven't picked their leader yet. Either Kamala Harris or Bernie Sanders will give Trump a good fight

Very true. I forgot about that.

So ? We aren’t a pure democracy we are a government that makes everyone matter not just the populated coastal cities
If trump had won the popular vote and Hillary the college would you be still be saying this or would you be like thank god we Aren’t a pure democracy that trampled on the minority

Last edited by sly279 on 27 Mar 2019, 1:05 am, edited 1 time in total.

Reagan escaped prosecution and jail-time on medical grounds due to his dementia

The US has one thing in common with Australia is that there is "gerrymandering" of voting zones whereby too much voting weight is given to sparsely populated conservative rural areas.

If there was removal of this weighting the republicans would likely never win an election

And he differed from any democrat politician how? If anyone things any politician cares about them their naive or dilusional. They are the nobels and we are the peasants. Kings don’t care about their peasants unless enough of them rise up to remove them.
Only difference is now we elect our Kong’s and lords and delude ourselves into thinking our voices matter.
They don’t call themselves nobles anymore but nothing’s changed since ancient times they just changed the system to appear it’s changed. We are still ruled by wealthy elites same as we were two thousand years ago. Same as we will two thousand years from now. Notice poor people don’t get elected not even hardly at local level. All my cities council are rich business owners. Same with our state representatives, the government positions are well off people as well. Bernie Sanders is stupid rich. You need wealth and connections to run and win any level of government. How can’t rich elites represent poor masses? They don’t begin to understand what it’s like to be poor. Moat are super old so not only do they not know what it’s like to be poor they don’t even know what it’s like to be our generation. They rule like it’s still 1960. Most don’t understand technology.
When they die their kids run, thus becoming a family position. They are modern nobels in every sense. Our lords and kings.
Could anyone in this forum hope to win a position?
Could any poor person? Or even just middle class person?
I don’t think any politician can represent me or people like me.

..

Last edited by sly279 on 27 Mar 2019, 3:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

Actually, the reasons for the Electoral College very existence were much less about giving small states equality with big ones (the senate was the solution for that problem).
The founders in fact feared absolute democracy, believing that some populist demagogue could get himself elected by riling up the common people who said founders had little faith in making wise decisions.
Then there's the matter of slave states fearing that they would be out voted by free states, which was taken care of by the Electoral College evening the playing field so to speak.
Alexander Hamilton, who had introduced the idea ended up believing it was a terrible idea, but was unable to get enough support in congress to get rid of the thing.

No it’s to make sure that people in rular area votes matter just as much as people in urban areas