naturalplastic wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Hilarious.
All the bitching about how unnecessary and ridiculous a space force would be, and now bitching about not enough initial money being sunk into it. This why I disregard a lot of the complaints I hear about Trump.
This is why we disregard your comments. They make no sense.
I could announce that I was starting a program to "dress up a cow in an astronaut suit and land it on the Moon", and then boast that I have "already raised a 100 dollars for the program!".
You could respond by correctly pointing out that (a) "landing the first cow to walk on the moon is an inane useless stunt", and that (b)"if you're going to land a cow on the moon it would take a lot more than $100 dollars, and it's more like several 100 billion in today's money. So you have a long way to go in fundraising".
Points A and B are not in any way contradictory.
Who is we? Group telepathy? You mean you. That nonsensical analogy is what makes no sense. The space force was seriously discussed among scientists and military way before 2016 and was bound to take form. It is a department of ie an extension of the Air Force. It is not something that is being started from scratch.
Most of the hardware and personnel should already be in place. Or did you think the government and military were ignoring all those satellites whizzing around and had no means of tracking and regulating them until now?
Essentially the space force has already existed for some time. It just was not departmentalized like the air force was not departmentalized for some time. In other words the military was already using airplanes before the air force was officially established.