Dylann Roof's lawyers appeal death sentence citing autism

Page 5 of 13 [ 196 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 13  Next

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 38,088
Location: Long Island, New York

30 Jan 2020, 9:14 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
TheRobotLives wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Autism =\= Insanity

Any judges worth their pay should know this.

It's not that simple.

Most autistic people are likely physically and/or mentally tortured by others because of their autism.

Likely, this torture will cause negative consequences in some.


That is not an excuse to plan and carry out a mass shooting.

While Dylann Roof had an unsteady home life I have seen no evidence that he was abused or bullied.

TheRobotLives wrote:
This about a spectrum of people.

That is why there is no .75 Autism age


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


Last edited by ASPartOfMe on 30 Jan 2020, 9:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 38,088
Location: Long Island, New York

30 Jan 2020, 9:21 pm

BenderRodriguez wrote:
Fnord wrote:

Your assessment that people with PTSD are dangerous is a bigoted one, and I resent it.[/color]


Yes, so do I - we're just two of the many people here officially diagnosed with ASD and (C)PTSD. We aren't criminals, abusers or racist, yet we are all painted with this brush :roll:

Finding excuses for Roof's actions based on an imaginary diagnosis, speculation and the desperate actions of his lawyers does nothing but feed into the public ignorance and preconceptions about autism and PTSD.

A little off-topic but the stereotype of PTSD "psycho" Vietnam veteran propagated by the news and entertainment industries in the decades after the war has done all sorts of harm.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


TheRobotLives
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2019
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,092
Location: Quiet, Dark, Comfy Spot

30 Jan 2020, 9:43 pm

ASPartOfMe wrote:
TheRobotLives wrote:
This about a spectrum of people.

That is why there is no .75 Autism age

I think the idea is that many autistic people get told, "You lack common sense" (lack big picture thinking) when younger.

However, as they age, and learn what is going on, that likely diminishes.

So, their "maturity" is perceived to develop slower.

Here is a WP topic about "lacking common sense"
viewtopic.php?t=252266


_________________
Then a hero comes along, with the strength to carry on, and you cast your fears aside, and you know you can survive.

Be the hero of your life.


Borromeo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 1 Jun 2019
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,440

30 Jan 2020, 10:07 pm

Commonsense is actually rather uncommon and many autistic people are quite capable of achieving it.

Here is a strange thought. I was told a few years ago by a psych that I read on the level of a 35-year-old Ph.D. graduate. Ok, cool. It's like book-Netflix, all access. But one day, before I even knew how Aspergers' worked, and shortly before I was diagnosed, I was panicking on the telephone as usual and mentioned something about "going through life like an autistic 14-year-old" which the person I was talking to thought was a curious way to put it...and so that is how I dug into the question of age, actual age, and rough imprecise equivalences.

Anyhow, we are talking about "autistic age" but we need to see it as just a way of speech. Taking it too literally is a very autistic thing to do--a "figure of speech" is not the pronunciation marks in the Webster's Dictionary. Of course we all know that but it's easy to get caught up in the joy of being too literal.

And that is neither defending nor condemning Root but simply exploring an interesting concept posed by one of our members a while back. It might well be nuts. In which case I am sure Fnord will crack it expertly as usual.


_________________
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 134 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 72 of 200
You are very likely neurodiverse (Aspie)


B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

30 Jan 2020, 10:22 pm

Common sense varies according to location and time, its a reactive set of behaviours not some internal mechanism. What is common sense in one place or era is often stupidity in another. I suspect that NTs seem to think they all possess it and none of we AS people do, - and if so that is yet another of their simplistic binaries that lack common sense.... (oh the irony!)



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

31 Jan 2020, 2:47 am

TheRobotLives wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
Well..the burden of proof is on you - to explain how autism CAN cause criminal behavior. Not on me to argue that it cannot.

That's easy.

Autism --> PTSD -->criminal violent behavior

Autistic people suffer tremendous abuse, heck, they're killed pretty often by their parents or relatives.

You can't abuse people and expect to get a well-functioning human.


Okay...

So you're actually agreeing with me that autism per se doesn't cause criminal behavior.

Its other factors that can cause criminal behavior, and these other factors can be caused by autism.

So lets walk through this.

Growing up autistic pretty much guarantees that you will become a lightening rod for some amount of abuse. Some autistics get more than others.

And you're saying that some autistics can get SO much abuse that it causes them PTSD.

And that PTSD can cause criminal behavior.

Now I have heard of NT Vietnam vets getting off on a PTSD defense for murder. A guy hears a noise outside while trying to sleep at night, and gets up to investigate. Gets a gun out of his drawer. Goes walking around the yard at night. And then gets a flashback that he is on patrol back in Nam, and goes on mental autopilot. And then shoots some innocent person because he thought he was protecting his squad from the Viet Cong.

But going zombie with a gun is not the same thing as premeditated mass murder.

I still don't quite follow your logic.



vermontsavant
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,110
Location: Left WP forever

31 Jan 2020, 7:52 am

Fnord wrote:
vermontsavant wrote:
Fnord wrote:
You showed strong correlation, leaving out the things that you did that got you fired. Were you chronically late? Were you a slow worker? Did you show lack of respect toward your supervisors and coworkers?

Sure, your childhood was rough, but it was your actions that got you fired, not your past.
People who are disabled do get mistreated on the job for no fault of there own,you don't know if the fireing's or mistreatment was his fault.You have no way of knowing that,you don't know the individual whose post your responding too,sounds more your trolling.
"Trolling"? Since when is asking questions and providing different points of view "trolling"?
You didn't have any actual knowledge of the person who you were responding to,it's one thing to counter a viewpoint it's another to make accusations toward people with no knowledge that those accusations are even true.


_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

31 Jan 2020, 8:52 am

vermontsavant wrote:
Fnord wrote:
vermontsavant wrote:
Fnord wrote:
You showed strong correlation, leaving out the things that you did that got you fired. Were you chronically late? Were you a slow worker? Did you show lack of respect toward your supervisors and coworkers? Sure, your childhood was rough, but it was your actions that got you fired, not your past.
People who are disabled do get mistreated on the job for no fault of there own,you don't know if the fireing's or mistreatment was his fault.You have no way of knowing that,you don't know the individual whose post your responding too,sounds more your trolling.
"Trolling"? Since when is asking questions and providing different points of view "trolling"?
You didn't have any actual knowledge of the person who you were responding to,it's one thing to counter a viewpoint it's another to make accusations toward people with no knowledge that those accusations are even true.
What accusations? If you're referring to the statement that "it was your actions that got you fired", then that is not a mere accusation. People get fired for their actions (or lack of action), and not for their thoughts, feelings, or memories. I should know, since I've had to dismiss several people over the last 30 years or so for laziness, incompetence, disruptive behavior, violence and threats of violence.

Now, who died and made you moderator?



vermontsavant
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,110
Location: Left WP forever

31 Jan 2020, 9:07 am

Fnord wrote:
vermontsavant wrote:
Fnord wrote:
vermontsavant wrote:
Fnord wrote:
You showed strong correlation, leaving out the things that you did that got you fired. Were you chronically late? Were you a slow worker? Did you show lack of respect toward your supervisors and coworkers? Sure, your childhood was rough, but it was your actions that got you fired, not your past.
People who are disabled do get mistreated on the job for no fault of there own,you don't know if the fireing's or mistreatment was his fault.You have no way of knowing that,you don't know the individual whose post your responding too,sounds more your trolling.
"Trolling"? Since when is asking questions and providing different points of view "trolling"?
You didn't have any actual knowledge of the person who you were responding to,it's one thing to counter a viewpoint it's another to make accusations toward people with no knowledge that those accusations are even true.
What accusations? If you're referring to the statement that "it was your actions that got you fired", then that is not a mere accusation. People get fired for their actions (or lack of action), and not for their thoughts, feelings, or memories. I should know, since I've had to dismiss several people over the last 30 years or so for laziness, incompetence, disruptive behavior, violence and threats of violence.

Now, who died and made you moderator?
You don't know why he got fired,you don't know anything about him,your just doing what you always do,trolling,putting people down and being as negative as possible.


_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

31 Jan 2020, 9:09 am

vermontsavant wrote:
Fnord wrote:
vermontsavant wrote:
Fnord wrote:
vermontsavant wrote:
Fnord wrote:
You showed strong correlation, leaving out the things that you did that got you fired. Were you chronically late? Were you a slow worker? Did you show lack of respect toward your supervisors and coworkers? Sure, your childhood was rough, but it was your actions that got you fired, not your past.
People who are disabled do get mistreated on the job for no fault of there own,you don't know if the fireing's or mistreatment was his fault.You have no way of knowing that,you don't know the individual whose post your responding too,sounds more your trolling.
"Trolling"? Since when is asking questions and providing different points of view "trolling"?
You didn't have any actual knowledge of the person who you were responding to,it's one thing to counter a viewpoint it's another to make accusations toward people with no knowledge that those accusations are even true.
What accusations? If you're referring to the statement that "it was your actions that got you fired", then that is not a mere accusation. People get fired for their actions (or lack of action), and not for their thoughts, feelings, or memories. I should know, since I've had to dismiss several people over the last 30 years or so for laziness, incompetence, disruptive behavior, violence and threats of violence. Now, who died and made you moderator?
You don't know why he got fired,you don't know anything about him,your just doing what you always do,trolling,putting people down and being as negative as possible.
:roll: Pot ... Kettle ... Black ...

Take it up with the moderators.

Oh, wait ... you already have ...



vermontsavant
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,110
Location: Left WP forever

31 Jan 2020, 9:25 am

Fnord wrote:
vermontsavant wrote:
Fnord wrote:
vermontsavant wrote:
Fnord wrote:
vermontsavant wrote:
Fnord wrote:
You showed strong correlation, leaving out the things that you did that got you fired. Were you chronically late? Were you a slow worker? Did you show lack of respect toward your supervisors and coworkers? Sure, your childhood was rough, but it was your actions that got you fired, not your past.
People who are disabled do get mistreated on the job for no fault of there own,you don't know if the fireing's or mistreatment was his fault.You have no way of knowing that,you don't know the individual whose post your responding too,sounds more your trolling.
"Trolling"? Since when is asking questions and providing different points of view "trolling"?
You didn't have any actual knowledge of the person who you were responding to,it's one thing to counter a viewpoint it's another to make accusations toward people with no knowledge that those accusations are even true.
What accusations? If you're referring to the statement that "it was your actions that got you fired", then that is not a mere accusation. People get fired for their actions (or lack of action), and not for their thoughts, feelings, or memories. I should know, since I've had to dismiss several people over the last 30 years or so for laziness, incompetence, disruptive behavior, violence and threats of violence. Now, who died and made you moderator?
You don't know why he got fired,you don't know anything about him,your just doing what you always do,trolling,putting people down and being as negative as possible.
:roll: Pot ... Kettle ... Black ...

Take it up with the moderators.

Oh, wait ... you already have ...
How is it "the pot calling the kettle black" who do I bother,I don't really get involved with opinions most of the time,I deal more in facts without interpretation most of the time.


_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined


BenderRodriguez
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,343

31 Jan 2020, 9:30 am

Not to interrupt a good fight, but according to their profile, The Robot is a she, not a he... :wink:


_________________
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." Aldous Huxley


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

31 Jan 2020, 9:35 am

BenderRodriguez wrote:
Not to interrupt a good fight, but according to their profile, The Robot is a she, not a he... :wink:
Why, so she is! I suppose we should deal more closely with the facts, shouldn't we?

:wink:



BenderRodriguez
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,343

31 Jan 2020, 9:44 am

Fnord wrote:
BenderRodriguez wrote:
Not to interrupt a good fight, but according to their profile, The Robot is a she, not a he... :wink:
Why, so she is! I suppose we should deal more closely with the facts, shouldn't we?

:wink:


What facts? I thought this thread is about speculation and assumptions :P


_________________
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." Aldous Huxley


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

31 Jan 2020, 9:45 am

BenderRodriguez wrote:
Fnord wrote:
BenderRodriguez wrote:
Not to interrupt a good fight, but according to their profile, The Robot is a she, not a he...
Why, so she is! I suppose we should deal more closely with the facts, shouldn't we?
What facts? I thought this thread is about speculation and assumptions.
Aren't they all?

:lol:



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

31 Jan 2020, 9:47 am

Fnord wrote:
BenderRodriguez wrote:
Fnord wrote:
BenderRodriguez wrote:
Not to interrupt a good fight, but according to their profile, The Robot is a she, not a he...
Why, so she is! I suppose we should deal more closely with the facts, shouldn't we?
What facts? I thought this thread is about speculation and assumptions.
Aren't they all?

:lol:


That's just a theory.