Matrix Glitch wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
A part of the article didn't make it into the first post:
The school board met to discuss Burke's response, commissioned a report and arranged a disciplinary meeting. On August 22, the board decided to place Burke on temporary paid administrative leave during the disciplinary process, stressing that the decision was not a disciplinary sanction, according to RTE.
This paragraph shows that there was a fair process going on, in accordance with HR procedures. It hadn't even reached a conclusion yet. And the teacher was still being paid.
You're supposed to read the article for content. Not the title. Not the summary. But the actual article to get the full content. Maybe I'll apply those instructions to whatever I post in the future, since it seems necessary.
The way it showed on my screen, I didn't realize there was more ... I had to close a CBS News bottom banner (which looks to me like part of the page) to even see the "read more" and then I had to scroll past a bunch of stuff.
So here's the rest, as far as I can tell:
Burke, however, continued to show up to school every day for his scheduled lessons.
The school then got a court injunction barring Burke from the school building, which he violated, saying he would not comply with it because it went against his conscience.
Burke was brought in front of a judge, who stressed that the issue facing the court was whether he had violated the injunction. Burke was found to be in contempt of court for violating the court's order that he stay away from the school.
Burke has been given the opportunity to "purge his contempt," which could involve him committing to not violate the court order again. The case is due back in court on Wednesday, RTE reported
The guy was clearly pushing it, IMHO. I don't see how or why complying with established school disciplinary procedures (like paid leave pending dispute resolution) and then a court order would violate his conscious. Do you?
_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).
Last edited by DW_a_mom on 07 Sep 2022, 10:31 pm, edited 2 times in total.