So you have formed and are stubbornly holding onto an opinion based on your memory of events without ever having looked up the one document that matters? The worst part for me is I can't even call you out for that because I know as well as anyone that we all have to make choices on how we spend our time, and I've unknowingly argued opinions that, it turned out, could easily have been refuted. It's human nature, but, dang, its annoying sitting on the other side of it.
Let me help you out, it takes less than a minute to read:
https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr ... 1/downloadPrimary purpose: Russian interference.
Scope: allowed to include investigation into individuals associated with the campaign of Donald Trump.
Note: complete lack of authorization to investigate Donald Trump himself.
Given the scope and my note are open to some interpretation, be aware that Mueller has stated he felt the document did NOT give him authority to investigate Donald Trump, the individual, and he did not do so.
I realize you don't care. So be it. But ... my opinion on this is weighing a whole lot heavier than yours.
I said I don't remember if I read it. Why would you expect anyone to remember whether or not they read a generic blurb like that five years ago?