Page 6 of 7 [ 107 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

05 Nov 2021, 12:02 am

Tim_Tex wrote:
What are the key differences between CRT and what people have traditionally been taught about historical race issues (slavery, segregation, et al)?


While Dox will say I don't know what I'm talking about, the truth is, plenty of whites of a conservative political and social bent have always taken umbrage at teaching the history of racial oppression, seeing the portrayal of whites as behaving badly offensive. The whole point is, they can now keep such actual history out of class rooms.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,801
Location: the island of defective toy santas

05 Nov 2021, 12:28 am

Tim_Tex wrote:
What are the key differences between CRT and what people have traditionally been taught about historical race issues (slavery, segregation, et al)?

it is an sociological analytical system predicated on the idea that racism has long been systemic in america at all levels, and not just demonstrated by individual people with their own prejudices. the theory states that racism and the resultant inequality/disenfranchisement is designed into our legal systems and adversely affects generations of POC in schools, offices, the criminal justice system and countless other areas of life.



Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

05 Nov 2021, 1:04 am

auntblabby wrote:
if they'd just come clean and admit to god and the rest of us that they don't like POC, say it out loud and proud, at least i could respect them for being truthful. but all this legalistic claptrap and philosophical flipflop is just so tiring, so old.


Yo genius, did you bother to look at who got elected?

Image

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va ... ck-latino/
Quote:
Virginia’s political landscape saw a historic shift this week when a Black, Jamaican-born woman won the race for lieutenant governor and the son of a Cuban refugee became the state’s next attorney general.
2021 Election: Complete coverage and analysis

The fact that Winsome E. Sears and Del. Jason S. Miyares (Virginia Beach) are both Republicans reflects the inroads the GOP is making in the African American and Latino communities that have long favored Democrats, political analysts say.

By reaching those historic milestones first with a ticket led by Glenn Youngkin, the governor-elect, that was more diverse than the Democrats’, which featured two White men, Republicans now hold a symbolic advantage over Democrats, said L. Douglas Wilder, who as a Democrat during the 1980s and ’90s became Virginia’s first Black lieutenant governor and governor.

“Republicans, they can say: ‘We not only one-upped you but you provided no reason why Democrats should continue to be blindly supported by those communities,’ ” said Wilder, noting how Sears and Youngkin have both vowed to fully fund historically Black colleges and universities, or HBCUs, that have long been underfunded under Democratic leadership.


Let me guess, Oreos and coconuts? Aunt Tomisha?


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

05 Nov 2021, 1:16 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
Even if any of what you're saying is true, it doesn't negate the fact that CRT is just a bogeyman used by the right to terrify their constituents into action, just as mixed race marriage, gay marriage, and Trans bathroom use had been used in the past.


Let me word this very carefully: Could you please try to post less stupid things in the future? Even by your standards, this is moronic; not only are you basically copping to not knowing what CRT is, you're saying that even if my criticism is accurate (which you can't say because you don't actually know despite loudly opining), it doesn't matter because the GOP is using it as an issue. That would be like me saying that even if all the racism the Democrats seem to see everywhere were real, it wouldn't matter because the Democrats are using it as an issue, therefore it's okay to ignore it, it's just a stupid, stupid take. All the stuff about marriages and bathrooms is an unrelated smokescreen you're trying to hide your ignorance of the issue behind, because you can't admit that your beloved party might be wrong about something, or that GOP voter may have a legitimate point, so you've got to try and muddy the water with this random BS.

Kraichgauer wrote:
These are the exact same people who want BS taught in schools like that the Civil War had been fought over states rights, that slavery was a mutually beneficial relationship, and who want to completely ignore white terrorism and segregation, all so that their children won't learn something contradictory to what their parents told them about race and history.


You think highly educated professional class suburban Virginians think that? I may have been too charitable in my previous assessment of your response, this has gone beyond mere stupidity to outright malice. You live in a reddish area, is this what you think your neighbors want?

Kraichgauer wrote:
And yes, I do know what's in the heads of those parents, as people in such red states have been pushing that ahistorical crap for years now.


Oh, you think you're psychic too? Tell me what I'm thinking about you right now, it should be really obvious.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

05 Nov 2021, 1:21 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
While Dox will say I don't know what I'm talking about, the truth is, plenty of whites of a conservative political and social bent have always taken umbrage at teaching the history of racial oppression, seeing the portrayal of whites as behaving badly offensive. The whole point is, they can now keep such actual history out of class rooms.


And I'd be right, you seldom know what you're talking about, unless by sheer coincidence your preferred talking heads have provided a rare accurate take for you to parrot. I'm sure some whites, and not just conservative ones, as an old union guy like yourself well should know, prefer to, *ahem* whitewash history, but it's not a common sentiment, and pretending that it is for political purposes is getting very old. Why don't you show us one of these bills that would prevent the teaching of accurate history? Surely, if that's so transparently the point and the GOP's real goal in bringing these bills, it should be obvious to even a casual reader of the bills that that's their purpose? Just a quick cut and paste will suffice, shouldn't take you but a moment if it's so obvious.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

05 Nov 2021, 1:37 am

Tim_Tex wrote:
What are the key differences between CRT and what people have traditionally been taught about historical race issues (slavery, segregation, et al)?


Well, there's a little bit of confusion regarding the term as it's become a bit of a catch-all term for a certain type of pedagogy that's become voguish on the left, but it's not a history program per se, though it would have a different gloss on a lot of American history in particular. You might call it tilt or slant, traditional American history classes would teach about slavery and what we did to the Indians and all of our other national dirty laundry, and the anti-CRT laws would do nothing to prevent that, what critical pedagogy would do differently would be to emphasize the racial injustice almost to the exclusion of everything else, teaching that America was founded as an inherently racist country, that we fought the British to preserve the slave trade (as claimed in the 1619 Project material), that everything ever created here was designed with explicitly racist ends in mind, etc.

Critical pedagogy also teaches identity essentialism, that the most important parts of a person are their immutable characteristics, with certain groups being victims and oppressors based solely on their identity and not their specific circumstances, it rejects the colorblind activism of the civil rights era as naive and ignorant, in many ways it resembles Marxist class struggle with identity standing in for class. There's a lot more, oppression matrices, affinity groups, there's some weird stuff with self ID trans issues that are not hypothetical, it basically casts everything through the lens of identity, even concepts like facts, mathematics, truth, it's quite bizarre, especially if you're not familiar with the post-modern theories that it evolved from.

This isn't imaginary, it's not some bogeyman cooked up by political operatives, the reason it's having so much success as a grass roots issue is that it's been creeping into schools for years, but this last year parents really started to notice it due to so many classes being online, and people often for the first time saw what was actually being taught to their children, and they want it stopped.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

05 Nov 2021, 1:53 am

^^^
(Sigh) So you think white public school kids are being taught to feel shame and self hatred for being white in Virginia schools? Because that's what your argument and insults add up to. By the way, here's a hint - - they're not.
Do I think educated parents in the suburbs of Virginia are racist? No, I don't. The fact that Terry McAuliffe had garnered as many votes as he had, despite losing, says he had won that demographic. But Virginia also has a very conservative rural population that allowed themselves to be scared $hitless by the CRT bogeyman, because they wanted to be. Them, and urban and suburban conservatives carried the day by this issue.
Yes, I live in a "reddish" area. Are there racists here? Unfortunately, we have our share, as some of the local idiots display the Confederate treasonous rag. But is CRT such a bogeyman as it was in Virginia? No, simply because, unlike Virginia, no part of Washington state, east side or west side, had ever been part of the Confederacy, or had a Confederate history to cling to and justify.
But seriously, you said you would try to keep from being as caustic and rude as you once had been. Try harder.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

05 Nov 2021, 1:57 am

And CRT creeping into our schools? Nothing like that had ever been taught to my daughter. And yes, she is a public high school student.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

05 Nov 2021, 2:05 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:

All CRT is, is a legal theory taught in law schools, that laws of the past had been racially conscious in stacking the deck against non-whites. It's never been taught in public schools to kids. What this is really about is how conservative whites don't want their children taught that white people had ever behaved badly toward non-white Americans.


You not only don't know what you're talking about, you're actively spreading misinformation; stop. You don't know what CRT is, you don't know where it is and is not being taught, and you really don't know what's in the minds of those opposing teaching racial essentialism to kids. This is literally just the cable news talking points, which happen to be the same as those of the Democratic party, which is honestly not unexpected coming from you, but it's still wrong and you should at least try to form your own opinion on something for once.


Even if any of what you're saying is true, it doesn't negate the fact that CRT is just a bogeyman used by the right to terrify their constituents into action, just as mixed race marriage, gay marriage, and Trans bathroom use had been used in the past. These are the exact same people who want BS taught in schools like that the Civil War had been fought over states rights, that slavery was a mutually beneficial relationship, and who want to completely ignore white terrorism and segregation, all so that their children won't learn something contradictory to what their parents told them about race and history. And yes, I do know what's in the heads of those parents, as people in such red states have been pushing that ahistorical crap for years now.


Mr Binary man had made us another visit. :mrgreen:

Why do you consistently overlook how leftist extremists pervert the theory for their own personal agenda?
"Curious. " 8)


What personal agenda might that be?
Is the right so pure as the driven snow as to not pervert anything?


Mr Binary Man. <tap foot>
I have never said the right can do no evil, but you have suggested on many occasions, over the years, that:
All Democrats are angels.
All Republicans are evil daemons.

I, on the other hand, constantly harp on about there being wrong on *both* sides of the political divide.
How many times do I have to say it before you understand my position? :scratch:
To suggest through implication, that I embrace a binary here, is self-evident nonsense. 8)



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

05 Nov 2021, 2:14 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:

All CRT is, is a legal theory taught in law schools, that laws of the past had been racially conscious in stacking the deck against non-whites. It's never been taught in public schools to kids. What this is really about is how conservative whites don't want their children taught that white people had ever behaved badly toward non-white Americans.


You not only don't know what you're talking about, you're actively spreading misinformation; stop. You don't know what CRT is, you don't know where it is and is not being taught, and you really don't know what's in the minds of those opposing teaching racial essentialism to kids. This is literally just the cable news talking points, which happen to be the same as those of the Democratic party, which is honestly not unexpected coming from you, but it's still wrong and you should at least try to form your own opinion on something for once.


Even if any of what you're saying is true, it doesn't negate the fact that CRT is just a bogeyman used by the right to terrify their constituents into action, just as mixed race marriage, gay marriage, and Trans bathroom use had been used in the past. These are the exact same people who want BS taught in schools like that the Civil War had been fought over states rights, that slavery was a mutually beneficial relationship, and who want to completely ignore white terrorism and segregation, all so that their children won't learn something contradictory to what their parents told them about race and history. And yes, I do know what's in the heads of those parents, as people in such red states have been pushing that ahistorical crap for years now.


Mr Binary man had made us another visit. :mrgreen:

Why do you consistently overlook how leftist extremists pervert the theory for their own personal agenda?
"Curious. " 8)


What personal agenda might that be?
Is the right so pure as the driven snow as to not pervert anything?


I thought it obvious.
The extreme left wants all Caucasians to embrace collective guilt.
Have you forgotten the "Take the knee" campaign?
They want all whites to self-flagellate.

It is the same nonsense I had to contend with as a child.
I had to inherit the sins of my German "forefathers".
I no longer accept such anti-intellectual drivel. 8)



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

05 Nov 2021, 2:22 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
What are the key differences between CRT and what people have traditionally been taught about historical race issues (slavery, segregation, et al)?


While Dox will say I don't know what I'm talking about, the truth is, plenty of whites of a conservative political and social bent have always taken umbrage at teaching the history of racial oppression, seeing the portrayal of whites as behaving badly offensive. The whole point is, they can now keep such actual history out of class rooms.


The teaching fraternity has been infiltrated by left-wing extremists.
We will have to agree to disagree on this point. 8)
They are instilling hard left-wing ideology.
Haven't you been paying attention? :scratch:
I am guessing they learnt that strategy from the Nazi indoctrination of the German youth. :mrgreen:



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

05 Nov 2021, 2:25 am

auntblabby wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
What are the key differences between CRT and what people have traditionally been taught about historical race issues (slavery, segregation, et al)?

it is an sociological analytical system predicated on the idea that racism has long been systemic in america at all levels, and not just demonstrated by individual people with their own prejudices. the theory states that racism and the resultant inequality/disenfranchisement is designed into our legal systems and adversely affects generations of POC in schools, offices, the criminal justice system and countless other areas of life.


From what I understand, CRT is abused, by the left, for political gain.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,801
Location: the island of defective toy santas

05 Nov 2021, 2:27 am

Pepe wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
What are the key differences between CRT and what people have traditionally been taught about historical race issues (slavery, segregation, et al)?

it is an sociological analytical system predicated on the idea that racism has long been systemic in america at all levels, and not just demonstrated by individual people with their own prejudices. the theory states that racism and the resultant inequality/disenfranchisement is designed into our legal systems and adversely affects generations of POC in schools, offices, the criminal justice system and countless other areas of life.


From what I understand, CRT is abused, by the left, for political gain.

to borrow a right-wing trope, just because criminals misuse guns doesn't mean that law-abiding citizens should not have guns. ;) same for CRT and POC.



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

05 Nov 2021, 2:28 am

Dox47 wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
if they'd just come clean and admit to god and the rest of us that they don't like POC, say it out loud and proud, at least i could respect them for being truthful. but all this legalistic claptrap and philosophical flipflop is just so tiring, so old.


Yo genius, did you bother to look at who got elected?

Image

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va ... ck-latino/
Quote:
Virginia’s political landscape saw a historic shift this week when a Black, Jamaican-born woman won the race for lieutenant governor and the son of a Cuban refugee became the state’s next attorney general.
2021 Election: Complete coverage and analysis

The fact that Winsome E. Sears and Del. Jason S. Miyares (Virginia Beach) are both Republicans reflects the inroads the GOP is making in the African American and Latino communities that have long favored Democrats, political analysts say.

By reaching those historic milestones first with a ticket led by Glenn Youngkin, the governor-elect, that was more diverse than the Democrats’, which featured two White men, Republicans now hold a symbolic advantage over Democrats, said L. Douglas Wilder, who as a Democrat during the 1980s and ’90s became Virginia’s first Black lieutenant governor and governor.

“Republicans, they can say: ‘We not only one-upped you but you provided no reason why Democrats should continue to be blindly supported by those communities,’ ” said Wilder, noting how Sears and Youngkin have both vowed to fully fund historically Black colleges and universities, or HBCUs, that have long been underfunded under Democratic leadership.


Let me guess, Oreos and coconuts? Aunt Tomisha?


That "little" detail seems to have been overlooked. :mrgreen:

The left constantly uses the race card whether or not it is relevant.
That is so "yesterday". :roll: :wink:



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,801
Location: the island of defective toy santas

05 Nov 2021, 2:32 am

IMHO black GOPers are just as bad for the working class [and by extension, many POCers] as white GOPers. clarence thomas and his regressive social views are the chief example.



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

05 Nov 2021, 2:35 am

auntblabby wrote:
Pepe wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
What are the key differences between CRT and what people have traditionally been taught about historical race issues (slavery, segregation, et al)?

it is an sociological analytical system predicated on the idea that racism has long been systemic in america at all levels, and not just demonstrated by individual people with their own prejudices. the theory states that racism and the resultant inequality/disenfranchisement is designed into our legal systems and adversely affects generations of POC in schools, offices, the criminal justice system and countless other areas of life.


From what I understand, CRT is abused, by the left, for political gain.

to borrow a right-wing trope, just because criminals misuse guns doesn't mean that law-abiding citizens should not have guns. ;) same for CRT and POC.


Agreed.
The qualifier "extreme left", as has been mentioned recently, was the context I was using.
I thought it obvious that the context followed through. :scratch:
Did I suggest *anywhere* I was a binarist? 8O :wink:

The problem is, left-wing politicians in power have turned a blind eye to its misuse.
This is my *opinion*, based on what I have observed.
We will have to agree to disagree. ;)