23 Nov 2021, 1:44 pm
DW_a_mom wrote:
Pepe wrote:
If she actually jumped to these conclusions, she is one of the "tools" I have been talking about, who don't wait for the facts to come in.
I honestly don't think she would know what a fact was even if it flew directly into her face. She's QAnon, and ended up running unopposed.
She will not run unopposed again.
I know virtually nothing about her.
As the brilliant intellect that I am, I am keeping an open mind while I collect the facts.
I don't *expect* others to do the same, but I hope they would. <cheeky>
23 Nov 2021, 2:02 pm
kraftiekortie wrote:
I've actually seen men being referred to as being "a beautiful human being"----without any objection from any man.
I've also heard women refer to men as being "gorgeous," "hot," "cute," things like that. I've no objection to that. I, myself, have been told that I have "pretty eyes."
It's not as common these days----but as I was growing up, certain women were referred to as being "handsome," with no insult meant.
I've also heard women refer to men as being "gorgeous," "hot," "cute," things like that. I've no objection to that. I, myself, have been told that I have "pretty eyes."
It's not as common these days----but as I was growing up, certain women were referred to as being "handsome," with no insult meant.
I have always been a handsome skunk, regardless of what others may think.
23 Nov 2021, 2:04 pm
VegetableMan wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
VegetableMan wrote:
IsabellaLinton wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Here's the ugly opportunistic wench
You disagree with her, so she's ugly and a prostitute?
Welcome to the world of partisan politics. Nothing is out of bounds, the opposition must me demonized and slammed in any way possible.
It may have escaped you but Marjorie is the one making this tragedy into a political issue
So are you. And you're utlizing all the disgusting tactics to demonize someone that has nothing to do with the issue at hand.
In other words, you're part of the problem not the solution.
I don't think cyber realises when he has lost the battle.
23 Nov 2021, 3:03 pm
Mary Lemanski, the former Democratic Party of DuPage County social media director, compared the driver who plowed into a Christmas parade outside Milwaukee to Kyle Rittenhouse.
23 Nov 2021, 3:08 pm
TheRobotLives wrote:
Mary Lemanski, the former Democratic Party of DuPage County social media director, compared the driver who plowed into a Christmas parade outside Milwaukee to Kyle Rittenhouse.
I find it disrespectful political hyperpartisanship.
But I am used to people being emotionalistic, irrational ratbags.
23 Nov 2021, 3:53 pm
23 Nov 2021, 6:36 pm
Pepe wrote:
Quote:
Is it true that Darrell Brooks is a racist? The alleged past posts of the Waukesha carnage suspect elicit outrage
Quote:
Brooks is currently in police custody, and social media users are pointing to an alleged former Facebook account of his where he allegedly discussed “knocking White folks off.”
https://www.cengnews.com/news/is-it-tru ... 76238.html
Keep an open mind.
Don't be a tool.
You mean this sort of thing?
23 Nov 2021, 6:45 pm
23 Nov 2021, 8:03 pm
23 Nov 2021, 8:25 pm
Brictoria wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Quote:
Is it true that Darrell Brooks is a racist? The alleged past posts of the Waukesha carnage suspect elicit outrage
Quote:
Brooks is currently in police custody, and social media users are pointing to an alleged former Facebook account of his where he allegedly discussed “knocking White folks off.”
https://www.cengnews.com/news/is-it-tru ... 76238.html
Keep an open mind.
Don't be a tool.
You mean this sort of thing?
It looks damning, but they are only words.
It is not as if he carried out his threats.
Oh, wait.
Anti-white racist?
Does such a thing exist?
Officers at the scene later described what he did as deliberate.
We are *so* close to the threshold of hate, I can taste it.
Might as well go for it, cyber.
23 Nov 2021, 8:30 pm
IsabellaLinton wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
IsabellaLinton wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
It may have escaped you but ...
Things don't escape me. Please don't condescend to me by implying they do.
I'm more than capable of reading threads and posts, and having my own opinion on human behaviour.
It was in response to DW
Thanks for clarifying.
I don't want to speak for DW, but I'm quite sure nothing escapes her either.
She hasn't caught me making a logical error, yet, so some skunks do escape her.
Last edited by Pepe on 23 Nov 2021, 8:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
23 Nov 2021, 8:33 pm
The only thing I can see that *might* mitigate Brooks' crime is if he is mentally ill.
I am not interested in considering if he was taking drugs, at the time.
I have my limits also.
23 Nov 2021, 9:05 pm
Pepe wrote:
The only thing I can see that *might* mitigate Brooks' crime is if he is mentally ill.
I am not interested in considering if he was taking drugs, at the time.
I have my limits also.
I am not interested in considering if he was taking drugs, at the time.
I have my limits also.
From the "Probable cause" section of the criminal complaint:
Quote:
it was clear to Officer Butryn that this was an intentional act to strike and hurt as many people as possible.
[...]
Detective Trussoni spoke with multiple citizen witnesses who were present during the parade. One witness indicated "As I continued to watch the SUV, it continued to drive in a zig zag motion. It was like the SUV was trying to avoid vehicles, not people. There was no attempt made by the vehicle to stop, much less slow down."
[...]
Detective Trussoni spoke with multiple citizen witnesses who were present during the parade. One witness indicated "As I continued to watch the SUV, it continued to drive in a zig zag motion. It was like the SUV was trying to avoid vehicles, not people. There was no attempt made by the vehicle to stop, much less slow down."
There may be a small amount of duplication between some of the above images.
The link I have to the complete criminal complaint is currently unavailable (likely due to a large number of people trying to access it).
23 Nov 2021, 9:10 pm
23 Nov 2021, 9:12 pm
23 Nov 2021, 9:21 pm
