22 Feb 2022, 8:44 pm
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Q: Would you prefer a psychopathic killer or a self-absorbed narcissist as the leader of your country? 
I much prefer a third choice.
3. A leader in the throes of dementia?
Any better?
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
22 Feb 2022, 10:54 pm
Pepe wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Q: Would you prefer a psychopathic killer or a self-absorbed narcissist as the leader of your country?
I much prefer a third choice.
3. A leader in the throes of dementia?
Any better?
Why does that have to be a third choice?
We have had that already... with Reagan and Trump.
23 Feb 2022, 2:06 am
Pepe wrote:
"What we've got here is failure to communicate."
Russia is a threat to its former satellite states.
They may even threaten to invade Ukraine, again. <satire>
It is an aggressive dictatorship with its leader being a psychopathic killer who used radioactive tea and contaminated underpants to kill off dissidents.
What part of "Psycho in control" don't you understand?
Are you Russian, by any chance?
Threat to satellite states... questionable.
Aggressive, yes but dictator again questionable.
There are much worse governments out there that we seem to be best chums with provided they have enough oil.
23 Feb 2022, 2:48 am
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Q: Would you prefer a psychopathic killer or a self-absorbed narcissist as the leader of your country?
I much prefer a third choice.
3. A leader in the throes of dementia?
Any better?
Why does that have to be a third choice?
We have had that already... with Reagan and Trump.
Why do I have to be the creative one all the time?
Why don't *you* suggest something/k.
23 Feb 2022, 2:53 am
Nades wrote:
Pepe wrote:
"What we've got here is failure to communicate."
Russia is a threat to its former satellite states.
They may even threaten to invade Ukraine, again. <satire>
It is an aggressive dictatorship with its leader being a psychopathic killer who used radioactive tea and contaminated underpants to kill off dissidents.
What part of "Psycho in control" don't you understand?
Are you Russian, by any chance?
Threat to satellite states... questionable.
Aggressive, yes but dictator again questionable.
There are much worse governments out there that we seem to be best chums with provided they have enough oil.
Do you have a Russian component in your genetic heratige?
23 Feb 2022, 2:55 am
Pepe wrote:
Do you have a Russian component in your genetic heratige?
I do.Navalny does.
It doesn't matter.
Lack of experience with Russia makes one probably more suspectible to their propaganda - imagining Putin is similar to Western leaders.
He's not.
23 Feb 2022, 2:58 am
Pepe wrote:
Nades wrote:
Pepe wrote:
"What we've got here is failure to communicate."
Russia is a threat to its former satellite states.
They may even threaten to invade Ukraine, again. <satire>
It is an aggressive dictatorship with its leader being a psychopathic killer who used radioactive tea and contaminated underpants to kill off dissidents.
What part of "Psycho in control" don't you understand?
Are you Russian, by any chance?
Threat to satellite states... questionable.
Aggressive, yes but dictator again questionable.
There are much worse governments out there that we seem to be best chums with provided they have enough oil.
Do you have a Russian component in your genetic heratige?
Nope. I'm just pointing out the poor outcomes in the past of goading super powers and the double standards of how the west will go ballistic if Russia buddied up with Mexico to build military bases near the US border and how other considerably worse governments seem to be tolerated anyway.
23 Feb 2022, 3:04 am
Nades wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Nades wrote:
Pepe wrote:
"What we've got here is failure to communicate."
Russia is a threat to its former satellite states.
They may even threaten to invade Ukraine, again. <satire>
It is an aggressive dictatorship with its leader being a psychopathic killer who used radioactive tea and contaminated underpants to kill off dissidents.
What part of "Psycho in control" don't you understand?
Are you Russian, by any chance?
Threat to satellite states... questionable.
Aggressive, yes but dictator again questionable.
There are much worse governments out there that we seem to be best chums with provided they have enough oil.
Do you have a Russian component in your genetic heratige?
Nope. I'm just pointing out the poor outcomes in the past of goading super powers and the double standards of how the west will go ballistic if Russia buddied up with Mexico to build military bases near the US border and how other considerably worse governments seem to be tolerated anyway.
Earlier on, I said I understand Russia's security concerns.
But we are were discussing why Russia's previous satellite states have joined NATO.
Well, I was...
You don't seem to want to accept my point and are going off on a sputnik tangent.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
23 Feb 2022, 3:06 am
Pepe wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Q: Would you prefer a psychopathic killer or a self-absorbed narcissist as the leader of your country?
I much prefer a third choice.
3. A leader in the throes of dementia?
Any better?
Why does that have to be a third choice?
We have had that already... with Reagan and Trump.
Why do I have to be the creative one all the time?
Why don't *you* suggest something/k.
How about a competent, intelligent leader dedicated to liberal democracy?
23 Feb 2022, 3:16 am
23 Feb 2022, 3:24 am
Pepe wrote:
Nades wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Nades wrote:
Pepe wrote:
"What we've got here is failure to communicate."
Russia is a threat to its former satellite states.
They may even threaten to invade Ukraine, again. <satire>
It is an aggressive dictatorship with its leader being a psychopathic killer who used radioactive tea and contaminated underpants to kill off dissidents.
What part of "Psycho in control" don't you understand?
Are you Russian, by any chance?
Threat to satellite states... questionable.
Aggressive, yes but dictator again questionable.
There are much worse governments out there that we seem to be best chums with provided they have enough oil.
Do you have a Russian component in your genetic heratige?
Nope. I'm just pointing out the poor outcomes in the past of goading super powers and the double standards of how the west will go ballistic if Russia buddied up with Mexico to build military bases near the US border and how other considerably worse governments seem to be tolerated anyway.
Earlier on, I said I understand Russia's security concerns.
But we are were discussing why Russia's previous satellite states have joined NATO.
Well, I was...
You don't seem to want to accept my point and are going off on a sputnik tangent.
Russia only seems to get aggressive towards European states because of NATO or the imminent concerns about NATO, not the lack of.
It doesn't take much reading between the lines to see why Ukraine has become a target in recent years for russian aggression.
23 Feb 2022, 3:26 am
23 Feb 2022, 3:27 am
magz wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Do you have a Russian component in your genetic heratige?
I do.Navalny does.
OMG!
We have a red under the bed!! !
SECURITY!! !
23 Feb 2022, 3:30 am
23 Feb 2022, 3:31 am
Nades wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Nades wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Nades wrote:
Pepe wrote:
"What we've got here is failure to communicate."
Russia is a threat to its former satellite states.
They may even threaten to invade Ukraine, again. <satire>
It is an aggressive dictatorship with its leader being a psychopathic killer who used radioactive tea and contaminated underpants to kill off dissidents.
What part of "Psycho in control" don't you understand?
Are you Russian, by any chance?
Threat to satellite states... questionable.
Aggressive, yes but dictator again questionable.
There are much worse governments out there that we seem to be best chums with provided they have enough oil.
Do you have a Russian component in your genetic heratige?
Nope. I'm just pointing out the poor outcomes in the past of goading super powers and the double standards of how the west will go ballistic if Russia buddied up with Mexico to build military bases near the US border and how other considerably worse governments seem to be tolerated anyway.
Earlier on, I said I understand Russia's security concerns.
But we are were discussing why Russia's previous satellite states have joined NATO.
Well, I was...
You don't seem to want to accept my point and are going off on a sputnik tangent.
Russia only seems to get aggressive towards European states because of NATO or the imminent concerns about NATO, not the lack of.
It doesn't take much reading between the lines to see why Ukraine has become a target in recent years for russian aggression.
"What we've got here is failure to communicate", still.
"READ MY LIPS!"
Eastern NATO members had a bloody good reason to join NATO for protection.
If you can't accept this, we will have to agree to disagree.
23 Feb 2022, 3:43 am
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Q: Would you prefer a psychopathic killer or a self-absorbed narcissist as the leader of your country?
I much prefer a third choice.
3. A leader in the throes of dementia?
Any better?
Why does that have to be a third choice?
We have had that already... with Reagan and Trump.
Why do I have to be the creative one all the time?
Why don't *you* suggest something/k.
How about a competent, intelligent leader dedicated to liberal democracy?
330 million citizens and you managed a Trump and a Biden in recent years.
I wouldn't bet your left testicle on finding what you have described.
