phil777 wrote:
Hrm, well obviously a gun gives you an advantage -.- This is actually the biggest thing with humans, since we have technologies, we don't need to develop physical traits that could determine who's strongest (like most other animals do). What i am against though, is how excessive the harm a gun can bring towards somehow who would fight unarmed.
? I'm not getting the syntax here... could you restate that please?
Quote:
(Heh, don't you often see in movies that the guy shooting the hero in the back is a coward?).
Quite so. So don't shoot people in the back.
Quote:
I'd also note that huh... The farther you are from someone, the less empathy you feel, the harder it is for you to strike her/him down. I doubt the people that dropped the nuclear bomb or launch missiles get to see the face of those they've killed, which makes it easier for them to strike without any back feeling.
This is true with firearms only inasmuch as in the case of someone wanting to use a firearm to CAUSE harm/Kill someone... usually agressively/illegally (drive-by gang shootings, psychopaths in tall towers, etc).
Quote:
Try stabbing or hitting someone at close range, it's not as easy as one might think.
I had to learn Aikido after dislocating a guy's arm, and nearly breaking his spine, when he pulled a knife on me in a place I was not "allowed" to carry a firearm. I would have much rather not had to do that... though in that circumstance I probably would not have had time to draw anyway and still would have ended up crippling him.
Too many years training in the "Hard" arts I suppose.
I was rather gratified to find a good Aikido Dojo but even still, when a later guy came at me with a tyre spanner (I never did find out why) my pointing a large gun at him was definately easier on both of us. He put town the spanner and we both went our seperate ways.
_________________
Malum Prohibitum, Malum Habenae Regum Est.
I'm not Jesus. Stop punishing me for other people's sins.
True Liberty Expressed as Fiction:
http://www.bigheadpress.com/tpbtgn