Dillogic wrote:
Declension wrote:
I don't see what is so "strategic" about causing terror if you don't even reveal who people should be terrified of.
A couple of people have kept an entire country on edge for several days.
That's about as strategic as you can get in regards to a "win".
A "win"? What game are we playing? You're making it sound like the culprits were performance artists or something. I don't buy it.
They basically committed suicide - they must have had some reason. Either they were angry (in which case they weren't playing a "game" at all), or they wanted to promote a cause (in which case it's a bit odd that nobody has owned up to the attack), or they thought that they could destabilise an entire country with a couple of pressure cookers (in which case they were delusional).
There's a reason that bin Laden claimed responsibility for 9/11. That was the whole point.