eric76 wrote:
AntDog wrote:
I wouldn't panic about someone, possibly an aid worker or a missionar, who had recently returned from West Africa and was then found to have symptoms of ebola. There is, as yet, no sign that anyone else was infected. I am sure that they are checking everyone he came into contact with since his return. Also, don't forget that ebola is not thought to be contagious until symptoms are about to show or are already showing.
uh.. its MOST contagious when symptoms are showing not that people are 'not' contagious until then.
The problem with tracking down people that this guy has been in contact with is that those would only be the ones the man remembers. Its hilarious the media portrays ebola like some sort of nasty AIDS that you only can catch if someone squirts blood, exchanges sexual fluids or you get injected with an infected needle with... ebola is literally no different than the flu virus except it is not airborne (yet) and it does not seem to survive long time outside the body like the flu does.
Studies of this virus show that even though it is not airborne it can be transmitted via water particle spray...aka an ebola person sneezes in an aircraft (or an elevator or an enclosed space) and the people immediately around him inhale some of those particles.. and have a high chance of getting infected.
Those situations are the kind of people that cannot be traced...and those people go on their own way and can be a week or two before their symptoms show ..time in which they have a chance to similarly spread the disease.