09 Nov 2016, 6:42 pm
0regonGuy wrote:
envirozentinel wrote:
Why did so many poor people vote against their interests? 
They are idiots. My dad was like that his entire life. He took advantage of every single government social program he could. Starting with the G.I. Bill for his education. Then when his business funded with government small business loans, went broke, we went on welfare, food stamps, and a bunch of other social programs that no longer exist, because he voted for Ronald Reagan who defunded them all. Then he went on to vote for both the Bushtards, while they were cutting his SSDI benefits.
It's the idiots with no education and no healthcare, working at Walmart for minimum wage that keep voting for these Republictards. Half the US population are uneducated fools who are too dumb to vote, but keep voting anyway. So the cycle of ignorance just continues.
More people would have voted for Trump, Stein or not at all if they weren't so thick and uneducated on Clinton's crimes. Please don't pretend to be liberal or democratic when you call everyone who disagrees with you and the establishment uneducated, idiots and claim they should even be allowed to vote. I could understand people voting Democrat to keep Trump out, if it wasn't devil woman Clinton at the helm. Also, they haven't got healthcare, because they cannot afford it under Obomber's bill.
09 Nov 2016, 6:47 pm
0regonGuy wrote:
EzraS wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
EzraS wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
she lost florida which lowers her chances of winning drastically. it will come down to Michigan this time and she is losing there bigtime. I am afraid the doomsday countdown clock has started.
She has already lost Michigan too, and Wisconsin and Ohio and North Carolina. Trump will win the election, but not the popular vote. Great system we have isn't it?
Well it doesn't seem much like what you earlier described as if it were already and established fact that Clinton had already won. If I were old enough to vote, what you posted might have talked me out of it. But now I know better.
So you are impressed with the outcome? Clinton winning the popular vote and Trump winning the election? The entire US political system is a scam. The only thing I was wrong about was who the oligarchists were going to make president. The election proves that it is not the decision of the majority of Americans.
This is the current popular vote:
Unlike you apparently, I'm into facts. Rather than predictions and myths.
No you are not into facts. You are into cherry picking.
Hillary Clinton 59,626,695 votes (47.7%) Donald Trump 59,428,493 votes (47.5%)
Hillary Clinton lost the election but is winning the popular vote
You claimed the election was already other and Clinton was going to win in a landslide, before the election!
10 Nov 2016, 12:48 am
JohnPowell wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
envirozentinel wrote:
Why did so many poor people vote against their interests?
They are idiots. My dad was like that his entire life. He took advantage of every single government social program he could. Starting with the G.I. Bill for his education. Then when his business funded with government small business loans, went broke, we went on welfare, food stamps, and a bunch of other social programs that no longer exist, because he voted for Ronald Reagan who defunded them all. Then he went on to vote for both the Bushtards, while they were cutting his SSDI benefits.
It's the idiots with no education and no healthcare, working at Walmart for minimum wage that keep voting for these Republictards. Half the US population are uneducated fools who are too dumb to vote, but keep voting anyway. So the cycle of ignorance just continues.
More people would have voted for Trump, Stein or not at all if they weren't so thick and uneducated on Clinton's crimes. Please don't pretend to be liberal or democratic when you call everyone who disagrees with you and the establishment uneducated, idiots and claim they should even be allowed to vote. I could understand people voting Democrat to keep Trump out, if it wasn't devil woman Clinton at the helm. Also, they haven't got healthcare, because they cannot afford it under Obomber's bill.
You do not get to define who is liberal, or how liberals should act. Especially since you have no clue what liberalism is. Here is the definition of liberal. I relate to all of the points. Except #15. Since we don't have any liberal party in the US. I am a liberal. I am not pretending anything, and you don't get to define me.
Quote:
adjective
1. favorable to progress or reform, as in political or religious affairs.
2. (often initial capital letter) noting or pertaining to a political party advocating measures of progressive political reform.
3. of, pertaining to, based on, or advocating liberalism, especially the freedom of the individual and governmental guarantees of individual rights and liberties.
4. favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.
5. favoring or permitting freedom of action, especially with respect to matters of personal belief or expression:
a liberal policy toward dissident artists and writers.
6. of or relating to representational forms of government rather than aristocracies and monarchies.
7. free from prejudice or bigotry; tolerant:
a liberal attitude toward foreigners.
8. open-minded or tolerant, especially free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc.
9. characterized by generosity and willingness to give in large amounts:
a liberal donor.
10. given freely or abundantly; generous:
a liberal donation.
11. not strict or rigorous; free; not literal:
a liberal interpretation of a rule.
12. of, relating to, or based on the liberal arts.
13. of, relating to, or befitting a freeman.
noun
14. a person of liberal principles or views, especially in politics or religion.
15. (often initial capital letter) a member of a liberal party in politics, especially of the Liberal party in Great Britain.
1. favorable to progress or reform, as in political or religious affairs.
2. (often initial capital letter) noting or pertaining to a political party advocating measures of progressive political reform.
3. of, pertaining to, based on, or advocating liberalism, especially the freedom of the individual and governmental guarantees of individual rights and liberties.
4. favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.
5. favoring or permitting freedom of action, especially with respect to matters of personal belief or expression:
a liberal policy toward dissident artists and writers.
6. of or relating to representational forms of government rather than aristocracies and monarchies.
7. free from prejudice or bigotry; tolerant:
a liberal attitude toward foreigners.
8. open-minded or tolerant, especially free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc.
9. characterized by generosity and willingness to give in large amounts:
a liberal donor.
10. given freely or abundantly; generous:
a liberal donation.
11. not strict or rigorous; free; not literal:
a liberal interpretation of a rule.
12. of, relating to, or based on the liberal arts.
13. of, relating to, or befitting a freeman.
noun
14. a person of liberal principles or views, especially in politics or religion.
15. (often initial capital letter) a member of a liberal party in politics, especially of the Liberal party in Great Britain.
Liberal | Define Liberal a Dictionary.com
10 Nov 2016, 1:06 am
envirozentinel
Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,226
Location: Keshron, Super-Zakhyria
10 Nov 2016, 2:08 am
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,259
Location: the island of defective toy santas
10 Nov 2016, 3:45 am
10 Nov 2016, 5:49 am
0regonGuy wrote:
EzraS wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
EzraS wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
she lost florida which lowers her chances of winning drastically. it will come down to Michigan this time and she is losing there bigtime. I am afraid the doomsday countdown clock has started.
She has already lost Michigan too, and Wisconsin and Ohio and North Carolina. Trump will win the election, but not the popular vote. Great system we have isn't it?
Well it doesn't seem much like what you earlier described as if it were already and established fact that Clinton had already won. If I were old enough to vote, what you posted might have talked me out of it. But now I know better.
So you are impressed with the outcome? Clinton winning the popular vote and Trump winning the election? The entire US political system is a scam. The only thing I was wrong about was who the oligarchists were going to make president. The election proves that it is not the decision of the majority of Americans.
This is the current popular vote:
Unlike you apparently, I'm into facts. Rather than predictions and myths.
No you are not into facts. You are into cherry picking.
No, I was posting the live results of the popular vote at that moment in history. You were saying Clinton had already won the popular vote as if it had concluded, which it had not at that time.
0regonGuy wrote:
Hillary Clinton 59,626,695 votes (47.7%) Donald Trump 59,428,493 votes (47.5%)
Hillary Clinton lost the election but is winning the popular vote
Hillary Clinton lost the election but is winning the popular vote
This wasn't the case at the time you said Clinton had already past tense already won the popular vote. Just like you said Clinton had already won the electoral college. It doesn't matter if you were right or wrong after the fact, what matters is you were saying things had already taken place when they hadn't yet.
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,259
Location: the island of defective toy santas
10 Nov 2016, 5:52 am
envirozentinel
Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,226
Location: Keshron, Super-Zakhyria
10 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,259
Location: the island of defective toy santas
10 Nov 2016, 6:04 am
10 Nov 2016, 6:04 am
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,259
Location: the island of defective toy santas
10 Nov 2016, 6:06 am
10 Nov 2016, 6:14 am
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,259
Location: the island of defective toy santas
10 Nov 2016, 6:17 am
10 Nov 2016, 6:26 am
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,259
Location: the island of defective toy santas
10 Nov 2016, 6:54 am
