06 Jan 2017, 12:46 am
EzraS wrote:
Even the events regarding Podesta and the Clinton tech people seems very fishy. Is someone who's achieved John Podesta's position, really supposed to be that stupid and gullible?
you have to remember, these people are not digital natives. they merely adopted the computer screen and thus tend to be less competent with them on average, we were born in them, molded by them.
they didn't see emails until they were already men.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
06 Jan 2017, 12:58 am
Kiprobalhato wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Even the events regarding Podesta and the Clinton tech people seems very fishy. Is someone who's achieved John Podesta's position, really supposed to be that stupid and gullible?
you have to remember, these people are not digital natives. they merely adopted the computer screen and thus tend to be less competent with them on average, we were born in them, molded by them.
they didn't see emails until they were already men.
I think I resemble that remark.
06 Jan 2017, 9:40 am
06 Jan 2017, 11:50 am
06 Jan 2017, 1:12 pm
06 Jan 2017, 1:54 pm
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
06 Jan 2017, 7:30 pm
06 Jan 2017, 8:03 pm
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
There wasn't anything sophisticated at all about the alleged "hacks", yes a 14 year old could of done it easily. I'll take Julian Assange's word as someone that knows technology over unnamed sources and media talking heads that specialize in warmongering. The CIA should not be trusted ever, they are shrewd political players and liars. Bob Barr is not a credible source of anything. Unless the person was a rank amateur they wouldn't be able to trace this, I don't think it is possible retroactively, it is very simple to not only cover your tracks but to make them look like they came from someone else too.
John Podesta gave his own password away, there was no brute force cracking or some sort of 80s movie hacker ****. Almost always when there is some major breach it's because some dumby screwed up, they get the information they want from simple techniques like phishing or social engineering. A lot of people haven't seemed to grasp yet the concept of a secure password, you'd think the dodos out there would of stopped using password as there password 20+ years ago but passwords like that still seem like the norm with a lot of people unless forced to do otherwise. Podesta stupidly clicked on a fake email which was verified incompetently by one of the Clinton tech people who seemed to have a lot of problems.
John Podesta gave his own password away, there was no brute force cracking or some sort of 80s movie hacker ****. Almost always when there is some major breach it's because some dumby screwed up, they get the information they want from simple techniques like phishing or social engineering. A lot of people haven't seemed to grasp yet the concept of a secure password, you'd think the dodos out there would of stopped using password as there password 20+ years ago but passwords like that still seem like the norm with a lot of people unless forced to do otherwise. Podesta stupidly clicked on a fake email which was verified incompetently by one of the Clinton tech people who seemed to have a lot of problems.
Well, if you watch CNN this morning, you'll find that very issue is being discussed. Can the CIA be trusted? Not always, no, but Assange and Putin have far greater trust issues. Trump had originally said Assange should have been executed, till wh***y started covering for him, while Putin has a long history of interfering with the elections of foreign countries he's hostile to. Plus, Assange has worked with the state run Russian news service, making their collusion all the more likely. What Trump's forgetting is, as President he will need US intelligence, but his rejection of their findings on this matter will at the very least lead to a frosty relationship in the next four years.
Have you considered the possibility that you support Trump on this matter simply because you support Trump in general?
You watch a lot of CNN don't you? Assange is a very honest man. When has Assange "worked with" RT? What findings?
Assange sold himself as an honest man. But if this is all proven to be true, then he is anything but.
And if he's so honest, why hasn't he exposed Putin's abuses? Bill Maher asked him why he hasn't exposed Trump's tax returns, and just got a brush off. Seems Julian is pretty selective in who he exposes, which means he's hardly the crusader he claims to be.
Bill Maher!! !! !! !! !! !! !
Have you even watched the Assange interviews with Pilger and Hannity? Until you have, don't bother replying.
06 Jan 2017, 11:20 pm
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
07 Jan 2017, 4:11 am
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
07 Jan 2017, 4:14 am
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
There wasn't anything sophisticated at all about the alleged "hacks", yes a 14 year old could of done it easily. I'll take Julian Assange's word as someone that knows technology over unnamed sources and media talking heads that specialize in warmongering. The CIA should not be trusted ever, they are shrewd political players and liars. Bob Barr is not a credible source of anything. Unless the person was a rank amateur they wouldn't be able to trace this, I don't think it is possible retroactively, it is very simple to not only cover your tracks but to make them look like they came from someone else too.
John Podesta gave his own password away, there was no brute force cracking or some sort of 80s movie hacker ****. Almost always when there is some major breach it's because some dumby screwed up, they get the information they want from simple techniques like phishing or social engineering. A lot of people haven't seemed to grasp yet the concept of a secure password, you'd think the dodos out there would of stopped using password as there password 20+ years ago but passwords like that still seem like the norm with a lot of people unless forced to do otherwise. Podesta stupidly clicked on a fake email which was verified incompetently by one of the Clinton tech people who seemed to have a lot of problems.
John Podesta gave his own password away, there was no brute force cracking or some sort of 80s movie hacker ****. Almost always when there is some major breach it's because some dumby screwed up, they get the information they want from simple techniques like phishing or social engineering. A lot of people haven't seemed to grasp yet the concept of a secure password, you'd think the dodos out there would of stopped using password as there password 20+ years ago but passwords like that still seem like the norm with a lot of people unless forced to do otherwise. Podesta stupidly clicked on a fake email which was verified incompetently by one of the Clinton tech people who seemed to have a lot of problems.
Well, if you watch CNN this morning, you'll find that very issue is being discussed. Can the CIA be trusted? Not always, no, but Assange and Putin have far greater trust issues. Trump had originally said Assange should have been executed, till wh***y started covering for him, while Putin has a long history of interfering with the elections of foreign countries he's hostile to. Plus, Assange has worked with the state run Russian news service, making their collusion all the more likely. What Trump's forgetting is, as President he will need US intelligence, but his rejection of their findings on this matter will at the very least lead to a frosty relationship in the next four years.
Have you considered the possibility that you support Trump on this matter simply because you support Trump in general?
You watch a lot of CNN don't you? Assange is a very honest man. When has Assange "worked with" RT? What findings?
Assange sold himself as an honest man. But if this is all proven to be true, then he is anything but.
And if he's so honest, why hasn't he exposed Putin's abuses? Bill Maher asked him why he hasn't exposed Trump's tax returns, and just got a brush off. Seems Julian is pretty selective in who he exposes, which means he's hardly the crusader he claims to be.
Bill Maher!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Have you even watched the Assange interviews with Pilger and Hannity? Until you have, don't bother replying.I mentioned Maher because he had consistently been an Assange ally. The fact that Assange did nothing about revealing Trump's tax returns left Maher bewildered.
07 Jan 2017, 4:33 am
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
07 Jan 2017, 4:42 am
07 Jan 2017, 4:59 am
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
07 Jan 2017, 5:22 am
07 Jan 2017, 11:26 am
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Why aren’t I allowed to date anyone other than my boyfriend? |
Today, 12:44 pm |
| Thank you Donald J Trump! |
06 Jul 2026, 5:23 pm |
