27 Apr 2020, 4:45 am
auntblabby wrote:
it is something beyond a mere mistake when some of his followers take him up on his "suggestions" and harm themselves. it is a cavalier irresponsibility.
<sigh>
<melodrama mode activated>
It is criminal negligence!
A crime against humanity!
Hang him by his gonads!
Remove his orange head from his orange body!
Burn his corpse and scatter it into the wind!
And, by edict, his name shall never be mentioned again!
<melodrama mode deactivated>
Seriously?
The real damage is to Trump's reputation and ego.
We call it, in the industry, a boo boo.
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,768
Location: the island of defective toy santas
27 Apr 2020, 5:02 am
Pepe wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
it is something beyond a mere mistake when some of his followers take him up on his "suggestions" and harm themselves. it is a cavalier irresponsibility.
<sigh><melodrama mode deactivated>We call it, in the industry, a boo boo.
what if it was one of your own kinfolk who took trumpy up on his non-licensed medical advice, and was injured? would you not conclude that it was not just a mistake but an injury upon a vulnerable [unfortunately less than wise] person via stochastic means? he has a persuasive power that he carelessly used, that is no mere mistake. if he told his followers to take up arms and kill all non-magas, would that still be a mere mistake?
27 Apr 2020, 5:08 am
goldfish21 wrote:
Dude...this president stuff is so too easy man
27 Apr 2020, 5:38 am
auntblabby wrote:
Pepe wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
it is something beyond a mere mistake when some of his followers take him up on his "suggestions" and harm themselves. it is a cavalier irresponsibility.
<sigh><melodrama mode deactivated>We call it, in the industry, a boo boo.
what if it was one of your own kinfolk who took trumpy up on his non-licensed medical advice, and was injured? would you not conclude that it was not just a mistake but an injury upon a vulnerable [unfortunately less than wise] person via stochastic means? he has a persuasive power that he carelessly used, that is no mere mistake. if he told his followers to take up arms and kill all non-magas, would that still be a mere mistake?
I thought (know) this was covered already.
He never told people to take "it".
He directed a question to his advisors.
Review the video.
Please don't distort the facts.
That is the media's job.
goldfish21
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
27 Apr 2020, 6:19 am
_________________
No
for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,768
Location: the island of defective toy santas
27 Apr 2020, 6:26 am
Pepe wrote:
I thought (know) this was covered already. He never told people to take "it". He directed a question to his advisors. Review the video. Please don't distort the facts. That is the media's job.
whether or not he even meant these things seriously or intended his people to hear them, HIS people [magas] HEARD these things anyways and heard them seriously. remember, they are used to subtle "dog whistles." he has his peoples trained all too well.
goldfish21
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
27 Apr 2020, 11:50 am
auntblabby wrote:
Pepe wrote:
I thought (know) this was covered already. He never told people to take "it". He directed a question to his advisors. Review the video. Please don't distort the facts. That is the media's job.
whether or not he even meant these things seriously or intended his people to hear them, HIS people [magas] HEARD these things anyways and heard them seriously. remember, they are used to subtle "dog whistles." he has his peoples trained all too well.
Hadn’t thought of that.. the rest of us are just hearing his words out in the open for the stupidity they are, whereas some of his red hat army might be “reading between the lines,” (or so they think) and following his instructions they think he’s giving them with a wink and a nudge..
_________________
No
for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.goldfish21
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
27 Apr 2020, 2:18 pm
_________________
No
for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.Last edited by goldfish21 on 27 Apr 2020, 2:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
goldfish21
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
27 Apr 2020, 2:20 pm
_________________
No
for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.27 Apr 2020, 8:16 pm
goldfish21 wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
Pepe wrote:
I thought (know) this was covered already. He never told people to take "it". He directed a question to his advisors. Review the video. Please don't distort the facts. That is the media's job.
whether or not he even meant these things seriously or intended his people to hear them, HIS people [magas] HEARD these things anyways and heard them seriously. remember, they are used to subtle "dog whistles." he has his peoples trained all too well.
Hadn’t thought of that.. the rest of us are just hearing his words out in the open for the stupidity they are, whereas some of his red hat army might be “reading between the lines,” (or so they think) and following his instructions they think he’s giving them with a wink and a nudge..
He didn't say do it. He asked a question.
Drawing the conclusion that a question is a directive, is rather bizarro-land stuff.
Conspiracy fruitloop country.
Talk about drawing a very, very long bow.
Do you guys listen to yourselves?
27 Apr 2020, 8:25 pm
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,143
Location: Right over your left shoulder
27 Apr 2020, 8:32 pm
27 Apr 2020, 9:43 pm
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,143
Location: Right over your left shoulder
27 Apr 2020, 10:07 pm
27 Apr 2020, 10:10 pm
Unless you want to take it that way (injecting/consuming disinfectant), you won't take it that way. If you want to take it that way, you will.
27 Apr 2020, 10:45 pm
funeralxempire wrote:
If most reasonable people are in agreement with one interpretation and a few nuts are desperately attempting to reframe the issue in a way that absolutely contradicts the standard interpretation, it isn't the common understanding that's unreasonable. Good luck with defending the indefensible, you guys will need it.
I am assuming you think your interpretation is the reasonable one,
And facts be damned.
Review the video, again, with your one good eye.
Well, your only eye.
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Computer Issues |
27 Apr 2025, 11:58 pm |
| Sensory Issues |
05 Jun 2025, 1:25 pm |
| Do you have unexplained medical issues? |
Today, 7:17 am |
| Does a relationship fix any issues than if you didn't? |
30 Mar 2025, 12:55 pm |
