Mikah wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Mikah wrote:
You are aware that in 2014, when Russia, playing by the rules, offered Ukraine a sweeter deal than the EU, the U.S. [u]overthrew the democratically elected government of Ukraine in a staged and managed mob coup d'etat?[/u] To which the Russians responded by annexing Crimea?
Link?
This is a decent run down:
https://consortiumnews.com/2015/01/06/n ... n-ukraine/I did try to find a video for you, but I couldn't find one that laid it out quite so well.
Interesting, but it is just another POV.
I am not saying I disbelieve it, however.
Being skeptical is part an parcel of being objective.
It would be interesting to follow up on who Yanukovych actually was.
Was he turely corrupted and under the influence of pootin like Lukashenko, or was he simply put in an untenable position?
Consider Belarus and Lukashenko.
I don't know much about that either, but from what I hear,
Lukashenko illegally seized control and is a puppet of pootin. I think the latter is self-evident, don't you?
Firstly, do you agree with this statement?
And if you do, why wouldn't the Yanukovych story have a similar corrupt origin?
You do agree that pootin acts more like a gangster than a statesman, don't you?
Not many men with integrity <sic> go around boasting (by implication) that they can basically assassinate any dissenter they want and violate any country's sovereignty while doing it, would you agree?