Diocese says school that flew BLM, Pride flags not Catholic

Page 7 of 10 [ 145 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

magz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

21 Jun 2022, 7:22 am

Matrix Glitch wrote:
magz wrote:
So, you think social and organizational rejection of groups of people for non-theological reasons is not a problem?
That was my impression after reading responses of Americans in this thread. That for Americans, an attitude of kicking out whoever one doesn't like is natural, not problematic.
Do you believe every group should be universally accepted and every group's flag allowed to be flown?
Can you first answer my question?
I really try to understand the underlying cultural differences.


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

21 Jun 2022, 7:38 am

It should be obvious that some flags are more odious than other flags.

I don't believe the Nazi German flag should have equal status to the modern German flag, for example.



Matrix Glitch
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2021
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,741
Location: US

21 Jun 2022, 7:42 am

magz wrote:
Matrix Glitch wrote:
magz wrote:
So, you think social and organizational rejection of groups of people for non-theological reasons is not a problem?
That was my impression after reading responses of Americans in this thread. That for Americans, an attitude of kicking out whoever one doesn't like is natural, not problematic.
Do you believe every group should be universally accepted and every group's flag allowed to be flown?
Can you first answer my question?
I really try to understand the underlying cultural differences.


No I don't think it's a problem because the opposite would be big problem. I'm quite sure you don't believe every group and symbol should be universally accepted by the RCC.



Matrix Glitch
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2021
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,741
Location: US

21 Jun 2022, 7:48 am

kraftiekortie wrote:
It should be obvious that some flags are more odious than other flags.

I don't believe the Nazi German flag should have equal status to the modern German flag, for example.


What about the Gadsden (Don't Tread On Me) flag used by MAGAs? Should the Catholic church allow that to be flown in Catholic schools I wonder.

I remember there being a huge uproar over Nike embroidering the Colonial flag on the back of its shoes.

It seems if a flag or symbol is condemned by woke, then it's perfectly fine and commendable for it to be banned.



Last edited by Matrix Glitch on 21 Jun 2022, 8:04 am, edited 1 time in total.

kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

21 Jun 2022, 8:02 am

I take it on a case-by-case basis.

If a 'Black Power" symbol was allowed on school uniforms, say, I would object. Same with a Nazi symbol. It's always best to leave politics out of things, in general.

"Don't Tread On Me" would have been okay before some of the "Alt-Right" appropriated it. It is a symbol of the right not to be oppressed by a colonial power such as Great Britain, or by any overarching government. I wouldn't have seen anything particularly wrong with that flag before this present age.

"Make America Great Again" is a phrase which insults America (which has always been great!)



magz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

21 Jun 2022, 8:17 am

I believe that:
1. Church is a community, not an army nor a business. Rejecting people from a community needs to have really serious reasons and should be exceptional situations;
2. School is not liturgy, so strict control of expression is inappropriate there. Allowing some expression within a community is something very different from requiring the whole community to embrace such expression. You seem to still have difficulty seeing this difference;
3. Church members see human suffering and show solidarity. If the church has a problem with movements expressing such solidarity and their symbols, it should propose an acceptable alternative to adress the problems. Ignoring human suffering, even forcing people to ignore human suffering or to pretend so - it is extremely un-Christian.


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


Matrix Glitch
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2021
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,741
Location: US

21 Jun 2022, 8:44 am

magz wrote:
I believe that:
1. Church is a community, not an army nor a business. Rejecting people from a community needs to have really serious reasons and should be exceptional situations;


How does not endorsing equate to rejecting? If I don't want to fly a BLM flag or wear a BLM pin, that doesn't mean I'm rejecting black people.

magz wrote:
2. School is not liturgy, so strict control of expression is inappropriate there. Allowing some expression within a community is something very different from requiring the whole community to embrace such expression. You seem to still have difficulty seeing this difference;


Caholic liturgy rules and regulations is taught in Catholic schools by Catholic priests and nuns, which is why they're called parochial schools.

magz wrote:
3. Church members see human suffering and show solidarity. If the church has a problem with movements expressing such solidarity and their symbols, it should propose an acceptable alternative to adress the problems. Ignoring human suffering, even forcing people to ignore human suffering or to pretend so - it is extremely un-Christian.


Charity is a significant priority for the church. Flag waving isn't charity.



magz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

21 Jun 2022, 8:57 am

Matrix Glitch wrote:
magz wrote:
I believe that:
1. Church is a community, not an army nor a business. Rejecting people from a community needs to have really serious reasons and should be exceptional situations;
How does not endorsing equate to rejecting? If I don't want to fly a BLM flag or wear a BLM pin, that doesn't mean I'm rejecting black people.
Not allowing to wear BLM pins is rejecting active BLM supporters.

Matrix Glitch wrote:
magz wrote:
2. School is not liturgy, so strict control of expression is inappropriate there. Allowing some expression within a community is something very different from requiring the whole community to embrace such expression. You seem to still have difficulty seeing this difference;
Caholic liturgy rules and regulations is taught in Catholic schools by Catholic priests and nuns, which is why they're called parochial schools.
Liturgy and regulations are taugh in theological colleges. Catholic schools are just regular schools providing regular education, maybe supplied with more religious formation. The name "parochial" means being associated with a specific parish.
Bottom line: a Catholic school is primarily a regular school. Often the students don't even have to be Catholic.

Matrix Glitch wrote:
magz wrote:
3. Church members see human suffering and show solidarity. If the church has a problem with movements expressing such solidarity and their symbols, it should propose an acceptable alternative to adress the problems. Ignoring human suffering, even forcing people to ignore human suffering or to pretend so - it is extremely un-Christian.
Charity is a significant priority for the church. Flag waving isn't charity.
Ukrainian flags at the entrance to my church show that charity and flag waving perfectly go hand in hand.
What charities do Catholic Church offer to ease suffering of the two abused minorities the "banned" flags represent?


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

21 Jun 2022, 9:06 am

Catholic schools, in New York City, primarily offer secular education. Many of the teachers are members of some religious order associated with the Roman Catholic Church. There are also classes which concentrate on specifically Catholic/religious matters. One doesn't have to be Catholic to attend one of these schools.

The discipline meted out in Catholic schools is often more severe than in public schools. The coursework is sometimes more rigorous than what is found in public schools. Many times, parents believe Catholic schools are preferable to public schools. The curricula must meet state educational standards.



aghogday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,332

21 Jun 2022, 9:27 am



i Am Almost Literally
Sick And Tired (Yet
i'm Not, It's Just Not
Worth It) of the Catholic

Church P88SYFooTinG

All Around Either

God Is

Love or
God Is Not
Love End And
Beginning of Never
Ending Human Story For Real Now

Yet They Are More Worried About
'Color' of 'SKiN' And What Body Parts

Touch
What Body
Parts When
It's Always Been

One Body When Real and Love

And of Course This is Limited to
No Church, Religion, Tradition, Or CuLTuRE As By Very

Nature ALL Bond And Bind Over Excluding Others

And True Any Real 'JeSuS' Couldn't ReALLY BeLong
To Any of These IF

And When

He And Or

Her is Really Love

Yet of Course 'That Whole Book'
is A Gaslit Lie of Tradition, Religion
And Exclusion to the Point of Torturing
And Burning Those Who Don't Belong Forever...

Ignorance
Ignorance
Ignorance

Still Harms
Rapes Maims
And Kills Most

Ignorance of Love For All

More Common in Small Homogenous

Groups Sure Even Small Southern Baptist
Churches with Little Farms Owned by the Pastor
And His Wife in Our County like the one i Visit
the First of Every Month for Dinner on the Farm
Grounds invited through in-Laws As Such And Fitting
in Well Enough Now that i Look Like i Could Easily Hit A Home-Run

On THeir
Softball
Team if
The Little
Church Was
Big Enough to Have A Team...

Yep Big Enough For All Love to Fit in...

THere is No Place in Church, Religion, Tradition, or CuLTuRE
For Someone Who Includes All in THeir Venn Diagram of Love

Just No 'WeaR'
For Them to
Truly Rest THeir Soul in Peace
Inhaling ThiS Way Exhaling Love For All

Giving, Sharing, Caring, Healing Yes WITH
LEAST Harm for All JoY iN oF LiGHT LoVE ReaL

Yet You 'See' my Au(r)tistic Savant Skill is Love
And i Am Verily Sure i am Not The (An) 'Only one'..:)



_________________
KATiE MiA FredericK!iI

Gravatar is one of the coolest things ever!! !

http://en.gravatar.com/katiemiafrederick


Matrix Glitch
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2021
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,741
Location: US

21 Jun 2022, 9:52 am

magz wrote:
Matrix Glitch wrote:
magz wrote:
I believe that:
1. Church is a community, not an army nor a business. Rejecting people from a community needs to have really serious reasons and should be exceptional situations;
How does not endorsing equate to rejecting? If I don't want to fly a BLM flag or wear a BLM pin, that doesn't mean I'm rejecting black people.
Not allowing to wear BLM pins is rejecting active BLM supporters.

Matrix Glitch wrote:
magz wrote:
2. School is not liturgy, so strict control of expression is inappropriate there. Allowing some expression within a community is something very different from requiring the whole community to embrace such expression. You seem to still have difficulty seeing this difference;
Caholic liturgy rules and regulations is taught in Catholic schools by Catholic priests and nuns, which is why they're called parochial schools.
Liturgy and regulations are taugh in theological colleges. Catholic schools are just regular schools providing regular education, maybe supplied with more religious formation. The name "parochial" means being associated with a specific parish.
Bottom line: a Catholic school is primarily a regular school. Often the students don't even have to be Catholic.

Matrix Glitch wrote:
magz wrote:
3. Church members see human suffering and show solidarity. If the church has a problem with movements expressing such solidarity and their symbols, it should propose an acceptable alternative to adress the problems. Ignoring human suffering, even forcing people to ignore human suffering or to pretend so - it is extremely un-Christian.
Charity is a significant priority for the church. Flag waving isn't charity.
Ukrainian flags at the entrance to my church show that charity and flag waving perfectly go hand in hand.
What charities do Catholic Church offer to ease suffering of the two abused minorities the "banned" flags represent?


I lived next to a catholic school and my best friend attended it. It was as I described. I think flag waving makes a statement but it doesn't feed or clothe etc anyone. Morally BLM supported rioting and the rainbow flag represents sexuality.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

21 Jun 2022, 9:56 am

I would say that some fringe elements of BLM “morally support rioting”—certainly the majority do not.

The impact wreaked by these “fringe elements”, though, outweighs their actual numbers.



Matrix Glitch
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2021
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,741
Location: US

21 Jun 2022, 9:58 am

kraftiekortie wrote:
Catholic schools, in New York City, primarily offer secular education. Many of the teachers are members of some religious order associated with the Roman Catholic Church. There are also classes which concentrate on specifically Catholic/religious matters. One doesn't have to be Catholic to attend one of these schools.

The discipline meted out in Catholic schools is often more severe than in public schools. The coursework is sometimes more rigorous than what is found in public schools. Many times, parents believe Catholic schools are preferable to public schools. The curricula must meet state educational standards.


The Catholic schools I know of, like the one currently near me, are part of the Catholic church building complex. The kids wear the traditional Catholic school uniform.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

21 Jun 2022, 9:59 am

Yep…..the students certainly wear the uniform….



Matrix Glitch
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2021
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,741
Location: US

21 Jun 2022, 9:59 am

kraftiekortie wrote:
I would say that some fringe elements of BLM “morally support rioting”—certainly the majority do not.

The impact wreaked by these “fringe elements”, though, outweighs their actual numbers.


BLM seemed to be at the center of the rioting.



magz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

21 Jun 2022, 10:22 am

It's a tragedy of American society that half of it sees a deep social and systematic problem underlying BLM and the other half sees only the rioting.
The police didn't help by indiscriminately pepper spraying all protesters, peaceful and criminal alike.
It all makes adressing the existing problems far less likely.

I really wonder - are there Catholic initiatives aimed at helping Black Americans being treated more fairly, more inclusively, dismantling the legacy of slavery still lingering in the society?
I know back in 19th century and earlier, there were Catholic abolitionist initiatives. Is there some equivalent today?


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>