RainSong wrote:
The article says anti-social. And even that isn't a diagnosis, but how he was described by other people.
Seriously, I neither get nor appreciate your title here. There was no mention whatsoever of AS in the article, it's probably not overly likely that he had it, and if anything, your title will do more harm than anything else. People who see this but don't read the article will think that he had AS, when no mention of it is recorded. So you're ultimately contributing to the violence myth more than the media right now.
Agreed, fully.
M.
_________________
My thanks to all the wonderful members here; I will miss the opportunity to continue to learn and work with you.
For those who seek an alternative, it is coming.
So long, and thanks for all the fish!