Page 1 of 1 [ 9 posts ] 

mitharatowen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,675
Location: Arizona

30 Sep 2009, 5:12 pm

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33080573/ns ... nd_courts/

Says they thought it was cool. I personally don't think it should just be the brander being charged, the brandee should be charged for being a moron.


As a side note:

Quote:
Pierce said the suspect branded his friend, a 15-year-old boy from Uniontown, by heating a fork, key ring, cross, a heart-shaped cookie cutter, and a crucifix over several hours

What's the difference? >.>



Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,727
Location: Houston, Texas

30 Sep 2009, 5:13 pm

Is it some sort of fetish thing?


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!


mitharatowen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,675
Location: Arizona

30 Sep 2009, 5:14 pm

I don't think so. It was two 15 year old boys goofing off.



Asmodeus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,520

12 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm

If he wanted to be branded, and he got branded, I don't see the problem. People have tattoos and piercings at that age.



CloudWalker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 711

12 Oct 2009, 3:02 pm

Asmodeus wrote:
If he wanted to be branded, and he got branded, I don't see the problem. People have tattoos and piercings at that age.


I concur.



CRD
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jun 2009
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 704

12 Oct 2009, 3:31 pm

8O The kid doing the branding doesn't have a license thats where the law comes in. I think I would kick my kids butt brander or brandie



CloudWalker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 711

12 Oct 2009, 3:40 pm

:huh: Is there a license for branding?



CRD
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jun 2009
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 704

12 Oct 2009, 6:29 pm

yeap, I think it falls under tattos in the law not like they are a new thing.



jrknothead
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,423

13 Oct 2009, 2:03 am

mitharatowen wrote:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33080573/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/

Says they thought it was cool. I personally don't think it should just be the brander being charged, the brandee should be charged for being a moron.


As a side note:

Quote:
Pierce said the suspect branded his friend, a 15-year-old boy from Uniontown, by heating a fork, key ring, cross, a heart-shaped cookie cutter, and a crucifix over several hours

What's the difference? >.>


A cross is just a cross... a crucifix is a cross with Jesus nailed to it...