Thomas the Tank Engine Maker Pays $1.25 Million Lead Paint

Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ] 

southwestforests
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jul 2009
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,138
Location: A little ways south of the river

30 Dec 2009, 10:17 am

Thomas the Tank Engine Maker Pays $1.25 Million in Lead Paint Settlementhttp://zikkir.com/business/19040

Quote:
Thomas the Tank Engine Maker Pays $1.25 Million in Lead Paint Settlement

Posted by Bruce Watson | 29 December 2009, 1:15 pm

The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) reached a $1.25 million settlement with RC2 (RCRC), the Illinois-based toy company that makes Thomas the Tank Engine and other highly-popular toy lines. The settlement pertains to the company's 2007 recall of an estimated 1.7 million Thomas the Tank Engine toys that were deemed to contain lead levels that exceeded the legal limit.

The 2007 recall, which included 25 separate Thomas toys, dealt a brutal public blow to RC2. The company is heavily reliant on the sale of toys it makes for small children. Among its brands are ERTL, Learning Curve, and Johnny Lightning, and the company is the licensed manufacturer of Sesame Street, Winnie the Pooh, Bob the Builder, and Thomas toys. Although the recall only affected a small portion of the company's products, it was a public relations disaster.

Some CPSC staffers claimed that RC2 was aware of the dangerous levels of lead in its products. RC2 continues to deny those allegations, asserting that it was unaware that its toys violated federal law.

In response to the May 2007 recall, RC2 quickly instituted a "Multi-Check Safety System." The program then failed to identify a second batch of lead-contaminated Thomas toys that the company subsequently had to recall in September 2007.

While the company's Multi-Check Safety System touts "tougher certification," "increased random inspections," and "zero tolerance for compromise on RC2 specifications," the only concrete policy change seems to be "mandatory paint control procedures for contract manufacturers, including certified independent lab test results of every batch of wet paint before the paint is released for production." While this paint control program might have helped identify the tainted Thomas toys, it isn't sufficient enough to catch a wide variety of other potential pitfalls.

The government has been a bit more proactive. The tainted Thomas toys violated a 1978 CPSC rule that prohibited the residential use of paint that contained more than 0.06% lead by weight. The scandal led to tougher child safety guidelines, increased enforcement, and harsher penalties. In August 2008, President Bush signed the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act into law: in addition to lowering the permissible level of lead to 0.009% by weight, the CPSIA set limits on three other chemicals that may be linked to a variety of childhood diseases. It also established mandatory testing of childrens products and established civil penalties that include jail time and fines of up to $15 million.

While the new rules may be devastating to manufacturers of tainted toys, the announcement suggests that the government is still taking it easy on RC2. In addition to its surprisingly low penalty of $1.25 million, RC2 couldn't ask for better timing for the agreement. After all, a pre-holiday release of the settlement would have poured fresh salt on the scabbed wound of two years ago; by announcing after Christmas, the government spared RC2 what might have been a brutal blow in an already depressed holiday climate.

RC2 did not return calls seeking comment.
Thomas the Tank Engine Maker Pays $1.25 Million in Lead Paint Settlement originally appeared on DailyFinance on Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:15:00.


_________________
"Every time you don't follow your inner guidance,
you feel a loss of energy, loss of power, a sense of spiritual deadness."
- Shakti Gawain


Macbeth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,984
Location: UK Doncaster

30 Dec 2009, 2:10 pm

What possesses a company to use such paint on childrens toys? I thought we settled all this in the late 80s...Why would anyone even bother introducing lead into the paint, or purchase it in the first place? Why does it even exist in childrens toy manufacturing? And what sort of dumbass executive these days thinks that "lead" and "childrens toys" will NOT lead to a lawsuit? Cut corners if you must, scrimp and save and whatever, but dont introduce poisonous materials to toys when it serves no puropse to do so.. it puts you in the same place asthose people who put glass in baby food.


_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]


Vivienne
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 22 Dec 2009
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 276
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

31 Dec 2009, 7:51 pm

There is lead in all kinds of kids toys. If you look up "toy recall" on Google you'll find an insane amount of toys being recalled for lead, strangulation, and choking hazards.

Many many many of these toys are still available to buy in cheap stores like the dollar store etc.

I'm not surprised they found lead in those toys, but I am surprised the company was actually held accountable for it!


_________________
Be not angry that you cannot make others as you wish them to be, since you cannot make yourself as you wish to be.
~Thomas à Kempis

"Be plain, good son, and homely in thy drift;
Riddling confession finds but riddling shrift"
~Shakespeare


Woodpecker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Oct 2008
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,625
Location: Europe

01 Jan 2010, 3:38 am

Oh Dear !

I would be interested to know if the toys were painted with a lead paint or a non lead paint which was contaminated with a trace of lead.

The first possibility is super bad and might be unforgiveable, while the second could be due to lazy or careless people.

Either way the toy maker has cooked up a super big stink


_________________
Health is a state of physical, mental and social wellbeing and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity :alien: I am not a jigsaw, I am a free man !

Diagnosed under the DSM5 rules with autism spectrum disorder, under DSM4 psychologist said would have been AS (299.80) but I suspect that I am somewhere between 299.80 and 299.00 (Autism) under DSM4.