Iran's Ahmadinejad: Sept. 11 attacks a 'big lie'

Page 1 of 1 [ 15 posts ] 

ikorack
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Mar 2009
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,870

06 Mar 2010, 9:06 pm

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100306/ap_ ... ea/ml_iran

Quote:
TEHRAN, Iran – Iran's hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Saturday called the official version of the Sept. 11 attacks a "big lie" used by the U.S. as an excuse for the war on terror, state media reported.

Ahmadinejad's comments, made during an address to Intelligence Ministry staff, come amid escalating tensions between the West and Tehran over its disputed nuclear program. They show that Iran has no intention of toning itself down even with tighter sanctions looming because of its refusal to halt uranium enrichment.

"September 11 was a big lie and a pretext for the war on terror and a prelude to invading Afghanistan," Ahmadinejad was quoted as saying by state TV. He called the attacks a "complicated intelligence scenario and act."

The Iranian president has questioned the official U.S. version of the Sept. 11 attacks before, but this is the first time he ventured to label it a "big lie."

In 2007, New York officials rejected Ahmadinejad's request to visit the World Trade Center site while he was in the city for a U.N. meeting. The president also sparked an uproar when he said during a lecture in New York that the causes and conditions that led to the attacks, as well as who orchestrated them, still need to be examined.

At the time, he also told Iranian state TV the attacks were "a result of mismanaging and inhumane managing of the world by the U.S," and that Washington was using Sept. 11 as an excuse to attack others.

He has also questioned the Sept. 11 death toll of around 3,000, claiming the Americans never published the victims' names.

On the 2007 anniversary of the attacks, the names of 2,750 victims killed in New York were read aloud at a memorial ceremony.


my opinion is : Meh

what do you think?



KingofKaboom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Oct 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,471

06 Mar 2010, 11:07 pm

I think Iran is going to get blown up soon.... They won't like what is going to happen if they keep going this way, they don't have China to back them like North Korea does so when they finally make too many mistakes and kill somebody it's going to be a crater.


_________________
Tacos (optional)


pat2rome
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,819
Location: Georgia

07 Mar 2010, 1:22 am

My opinion: that guy (same as all dictators) is completely paranoid and off his rocker.


_________________
I'm never gonna dance again, Aspie feet have got no rhythm.


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Arizona

07 Mar 2010, 2:35 am

Hasn't he blamed the jews for 9/11 in the past?



MissConstrue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,057
Location: MO

07 Mar 2010, 2:41 am

The same guy who denied that there were any gays in his country and that the holocaust never happened.

What else is new?


_________________
I live as I choose or I will not live at all.
~Delores O’Riordan


Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

07 Mar 2010, 4:53 am

I propose we all chip in to give him an all expenses paid vacation at the Dubai Hilton.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Inventor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,014
Location: New Orleans

07 Mar 2010, 5:21 am

He does have the backing of China. One of their larger oil supplies, a customer for Silkworm Missiles.

9/11, planes hijacked, and no one could find them? One I would think possible, but the second, and the Pentagon? We have Radar, we have airborn radar, we have fighters, but none were used?

Oil was $13, Haliburton bought the White House, it was an all Saudi mission.

The Big Lie.

Atomic weapons are useless, for if anyone launches, everyone will.

We are not talking your grandfather's atomics, that could take out a city, a hundred times that is a small one now.

The Silkworm counters sea power, and after eight years, more expense than WWII, the Taliban controls half of Afganistan, so our land power is not working.

In Iraq the Iranian faction now holds the government. Baghdad to Basra is within fifty miles of the border.

On the home front the stock market is down in adjusted dollars, 30% since 1999, 15,000,000 surplus workers, the worst health care and education in the industrial world.

Governments exist to see to the health, education, and welfare of the people. We don't have one.

Even Vietnam saw a paper tiger.



Ambivalence
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,613
Location: Peterlee (for Industry)

07 Mar 2010, 6:23 am

Inventor wrote:
We are not talking your grandfather's atomics, that could take out a city, a hundred times that is a small one now.


The megatonnage of nuclear weapons (assuming they are at least Hiroshima sized or up) does not make a significant difference to their destructive power in practical terms.

Inventor wrote:
The Silkworm counters sea power.


Assuming you mean Sunburn missiles, they would need to be nuclear tipped to guarantee to do so, which they are not. Presently. And if at some point the Americans lost a CBG to nuclear attack, I wouldn't want to be within five miles of any Iranian military facility.


_________________
No one has gone missing or died.

The year is still young.


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Arizona

07 Mar 2010, 8:16 am

Inventor wrote:
He does have the backing of China. One of their larger oil supplies, a customer for Silkworm Missiles.

9/11, planes hijacked, and no one could find them? One I would think possible, but the second, and the Pentagon? We have Radar, we have airborn radar, we have fighters, but none were used?

Oil was $13, Haliburton bought the White House, it was an all Saudi mission.

The Big Lie.

Atomic weapons are useless, for if anyone launches, everyone will.

We are not talking your grandfather's atomics, that could take out a city, a hundred times that is a small one now.

The Silkworm counters sea power, and after eight years, more expense than WWII, the Taliban controls half of Afganistan, so our land power is not working.

In Iraq the Iranian faction now holds the government. Baghdad to Basra is within fifty miles of the border.

On the home front the stock market is down in adjusted dollars, 30% since 1999, 15,000,000 surplus workers, the worst health care and education in the industrial world.

Governments exist to see to the health, education, and welfare of the people. We don't have one.

Even Vietnam saw a paper tiger.


you forgot to mention 4,000 jews skipped work that day at the WTC. :roll:



pat2rome
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,819
Location: Georgia

07 Mar 2010, 2:50 pm

Ambivalence wrote:
And if at some point the Americans lost a CBG to nuclear attack, I wouldn't want to be within five miles of any Iranian military facility.

When would you ever want to be? :lol:

As for some of the conspiracy claims...

Why we didn't use radar:

Quote:
In the decade before 9/11, NORAD intercepted only one civilian plane over North America: golfer Payne Stewart's Learjet, in October 1999. With passengers and crew unconscious from cabin decompression, the plane lost radio contact but remained in transponder contact until it crashed. Even so, it took an F-16 1 hour and 22 minutes to reach the stricken jet. Rules in effect back then, and on 9/11, prohibited supersonic flight on intercepts. Prior to 9/11, all other NORAD interceptions were limited to offshore Air Defense Identification Zones (ADIZ). "Until 9/11 there was no domestic ADIZ," FAA spokesman Bill Schumann tells PM. After 9/11, NORAD and the FAA increased cooperation, setting up hotlines between ATCs and NORAD command centers, according to officials from both agencies. NORAD has also increased its fighter coverage and has installed radar to monitor airspace over the continent.

Why we didn't use fighters:

Quote:
On 9/11 there were only 14 fighter jets on alert in the contiguous 48 states. No computer network or alarm automatically alerted the North American Air Defense Command (NORAD) of missing planes. "They [civilian Air Traffic Control, or ATC] had to pick up the phone and literally dial us," says Maj. Douglas Martin, public affairs officer for NORAD. Boston Center, one of 22 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regional ATC facilities, called NORAD's Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS) three times: at 8:37 am EST to inform NEADS that Flight 11 was hijacked; at 9:21 am to inform the agency, mistakenly, that Flight 11 was headed for Washington (the plane had hit the North Tower 35 minutes earlier); and at 9:41 am to (erroneously) identify Delta Air Lines Flight 1989 from Boston as a possible hijacking. The New York ATC called NEADS at 9:03 am to report that United Flight 175 had been hijacked — the same time the plane slammed into the South Tower. Within minutes of that first call from Boston Center, NEADS scrambled two F-15s from Otis Air Force Base in Falmouth, Mass., and three F-16s from Langley Air National Guard Base in Hampton, Va. None of the fighters got anywhere near the pirated planes.

Why couldn't ATC find the hijacked flights? When the hijackers turned off the planes' transponders, which broadcast identifying signals, ATC had to search 4500 identical radar blips crisscrossing some of the country's busiest air corridors. And NORAD's sophisticated radar? It ringed the continent, looking outward for threats, not inward. "It was like a doughnut," Martin says. "There was no coverage in the middle." Pre-9/11, flights originating in the States were not seen as threats and NORAD wasn't prepared to track them.


_________________
I'm never gonna dance again, Aspie feet have got no rhythm.


Khan_Sama
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 882
Location: New Human Empire

07 Mar 2010, 8:17 pm

MissConstrue wrote:
The same guy who denied that there were any gays in his country and that the holocaust never happened.

What else is new?


He also denies there are Baha'is in Iran - only Israeli spies who call themselves Baha'is.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rf2XoASwFeA&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]



Inventor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,014
Location: New Orleans

08 Mar 2010, 12:14 am

pat2rome wrote:
Ambivalence wrote:
And if at some point the Americans lost a CBG to nuclear attack, I wouldn't want to be within five miles of any Iranian military facility.

When would you ever want to be? :lol:

As for some of the conspiracy claims...

Why we didn't use radar:

Quote:
In the decade before 9/11, NORAD intercepted only one civilian plane over North America: golfer Payne Stewart's Learjet, in October 1999. With passengers and crew unconscious from cabin decompression, the plane lost radio contact but remained in transponder contact until it crashed. Even so, it took an F-16 1 hour and 22 minutes to reach the stricken jet. Rules in effect back then, and on 9/11, prohibited supersonic flight on intercepts. Prior to 9/11, all other NORAD interceptions were limited to offshore Air Defense Identification Zones (ADIZ). "Until 9/11 there was no domestic ADIZ," FAA spokesman Bill Schumann tells PM. After 9/11, NORAD and the FAA increased cooperation, setting up hotlines between ATCs and NORAD command centers, according to officials from both agencies. NORAD has also increased its fighter coverage and has installed radar to monitor airspace over the continent.

Why we didn't use fighters:

Quote:
On 9/11 there were only 14 fighter jets on alert in the contiguous 48 states. No computer network or alarm automatically alerted the North American Air Defense Command (NORAD) of missing planes. "They [civilian Air Traffic Control, or ATC] had to pick up the phone and literally dial us," says Maj. Douglas Martin, public affairs officer for NORAD. Boston Center, one of 22 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regional ATC facilities, called NORAD's Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS) three times: at 8:37 am EST to inform NEADS that Flight 11 was hijacked; at 9:21 am to inform the agency, mistakenly, that Flight 11 was headed for Washington (the plane had hit the North Tower 35 minutes earlier); and at 9:41 am to (erroneously) identify Delta Air Lines Flight 1989 from Boston as a possible hijacking. The New York ATC called NEADS at 9:03 am to report that United Flight 175 had been hijacked — the same time the plane slammed into the South Tower. Within minutes of that first call from Boston Center, NEADS scrambled two F-15s from Otis Air Force Base in Falmouth, Mass., and three F-16s from Langley Air National Guard Base in Hampton, Va. None of the fighters got anywhere near the pirated planes.

Why couldn't ATC find the hijacked flights? When the hijackers turned off the planes' transponders, which broadcast identifying signals, ATC had to search 4500 identical radar blips crisscrossing some of the country's busiest air corridors. And NORAD's sophisticated radar? It ringed the continent, looking outward for threats, not inward. "It was like a doughnut," Martin says. "There was no coverage in the middle." Pre-9/11, flights originating in the States were not seen as threats and NORAD wasn't prepared to track them.


The Big Lie.

Radar is everywhere, and the transponder attaches an ID, Radar targets without an ID stand out. After the first plane, anything on that vector stands our, no transponder, heading for New York.

We never thought there could be a disaster, the FEMA excuse in New Orleans, delivered a week later.

We do not have a government. We have bankers, oil, and defense industries making plans.

AWAC looks where it is going, full battle mode, can track hundreds of targets at once.

The United States Department of Defense, Lies, and Excuses.

So they are fully prepared to meet Soviet Union Fighters? The old CCCP?

They spend trillions to watch a few planes fly to Cuba?

As I recall their commercials, anything as big as a basketball this side of the moon, and we are on it.

We have space based radar that watches Americans. It is in real time, the plane that took off here can be tracked.

After spending twice as much money and time as WWII they are at a loss to understand why Afganis are winning? Our military is only for training to join The Haliburton Private Contracters.

When a system fails as often as they do, they should be abolished.

Having our defenses is the same as having none, so what are we paying for?

They are only an excuse for defense contractor pork.

They exist to protect the government of the banks and oil companies from the people.

We The People would be a lot safer without a government or military.

Oil at $13, no wars in sight, they had to do something to keep making that money.

There is an Election coming, another in two years, they all have to go, before they declare Martial Law.



phil777
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 May 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,825
Location: Montreal, Québec

08 Mar 2010, 12:21 am

At least the conspirationists have someone to look up to. =/



pat2rome
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,819
Location: Georgia

08 Mar 2010, 1:42 am

Quote:
Why couldn't ATC find the hijacked flights? When the hijackers turned off the planes' transponders, which broadcast identifying signals, ATC had to search 4500 identical radar blips crisscrossing some of the country's busiest air corridors. And NORAD's sophisticated radar? It ringed the continent, looking outward for threats, not inward.


_________________
I'm never gonna dance again, Aspie feet have got no rhythm.


Wombat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2006
Age: 77
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,051

08 Mar 2010, 5:35 am

So Armadinnerjacket thinks that the "official" 9/11 story is bovine excrement?

That just means he shares that opinion with the majority of the world population.