Raptor wrote:
I read the article. The theater was within it's rights to ask them to leave since the kid was being disruptive. They theater has an obligation to look after the benefit of ALL of the patrons and that means providing a non-disruptive viewing experience, even if it means culling a few of them out.
^This.
It does not matter
why a person is being disruptive in a theatre; it only matter that they
are being disruptive.
Autism is not a free pass to annoy others, especially when those others have paid the price of a ticket to enjoy the
show, and not endure disruptions, no matter what the cause.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.