Hi, Everyone, From what I read, he didn't write anything, but rather altered images of dead teen-agers for the purpose of hurting their families further. An image is registered instantaneously, there is no opportunity to avoid recagnizing what you have seen. One girl was accidentally killed by a shotgun blast; Mr. Duffy sent a picture of her face, with bullet holes added. One girl threw herself under a train because she couldn't stand being bullied; he sent a picture of Thomas The Train, with her face on the front of the engine. He was not expressing opinions, he was laughing at their deaths, using the internet to hurt people, degrading memories of their loved ones. If this is freedom of speech, what is he saying? Seriously,what did he ever say that his message was? One thing established years ago is that unless someone can be categorized as a celebrity, there is a right to privacy. Regarding whether a crime was comitted, wasn't this an emotional attack? The courts are recognizing bullying as a crime. The reason this case has been brought up is that his lawyer says that he has Asperger's. I see nothing in deliberate malicious behaviour that has anything to do with Asperger's. Nor his claimed alcoholism, though there are plenty of people who get mean when they're drunk. Most of THEM are more likely to punch someone than create an elaborate internet image, targeting people already in pain. Sylkat 