cyberdad wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Assumptions are not evidence; any claim beyond "there is something there" is invalid.
Your Lordship has attributed a statement to me that I did not make. Tisk Tisk.
Where does it say "Cyberdad said this..."?
cyberdad wrote:
Fnord wrote:
How would Google Earth allow someone to see the surface of Mars?.
Please refer to V001's instructions. Obviously you have not used Google earth before your lordship.
I have used Google Earth ... to look at
Earth. I use
Google Mars to look at Mars.
cyberdad wrote:
Fnord wrote:
This is how woo-woo beliefs get started: "I see something and I don't know what it is" morphs into "There is intelligence behind it", and the claim is followed up with further bogus information.
Well technically the jury is still out. The skeptics have already bounced around the following
1) Google earth generated viral hoax to promote google earth
2) Google earth anomaly owing to pixalation of fine granular detail on the surface of mars
3) ice remnants
4) crashed satellite
Of these 4 you can immediately discount 1.3 and 4.
Why? What evidence do you have to support that claim?
cyberdad wrote:
I am waiting for confirmation from Google earth that this is not a functional error with it's software in pixelation of surface features. If the answer is no then NASA have some explaining to do.
Only if there is an error in imaging, modulation, transmission, reception, demodulation, and replication; and only if NASA equipment is somehow at fault ... not that anything NASA has ever built has ever blown up, burned up, glitched, crashed, malfunctioned, or simply failed to work at all ... nope, never happens...
... like Hell it doesn't!
_________________
No love for Hamas, Hezbollah, Iranian Leadership, Islamic Jihad, other Islamic terrorist groups, OR their supporters and sympathizers.